- Thread Author
- #1
zoombabyzoom
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 2,774
For the sake of the conversation, lets just assume Suh is gone. If that is the case I see the switch to 3-4 as more of a need. We know from Caldwell and Austin that they seem to have an inclination to either use the 3-4 partially or make the complete switch.
I honestly feel our LBs look great with Ansah - Tulluch - Levy - Van Noy. With Whitehead being a great backup. We would need to add a couple death players most notably a backup edge rusher to spell Ansah. Along the defensive front if Fairley is retained (assuming the coaching staff thinks he can be a NT) and Jason Jones on one end we only really have one hole in the front 7.
Maybe we can spend some of the vacant Suh money to grab another DL and hopefully a CB.
Another couple thoughts, I remember hearing in the draft that Van Noy was more of a 3-4 LB. Am I misguided there? And could Fairley actually play a DE in a 3-4? Maybe bring in a Veteran NT like a Wilfork, Knighton, or Dan Williams?
I honestly feel our LBs look great with Ansah - Tulluch - Levy - Van Noy. With Whitehead being a great backup. We would need to add a couple death players most notably a backup edge rusher to spell Ansah. Along the defensive front if Fairley is retained (assuming the coaching staff thinks he can be a NT) and Jason Jones on one end we only really have one hole in the front 7.
Maybe we can spend some of the vacant Suh money to grab another DL and hopefully a CB.
Another couple thoughts, I remember hearing in the draft that Van Noy was more of a 3-4 LB. Am I misguided there? And could Fairley actually play a DE in a 3-4? Maybe bring in a Veteran NT like a Wilfork, Knighton, or Dan Williams?