Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Today's Good Old American mass shooting brought to you by...

Her situation was... dodgy. Read some of the results when you search "Melania Trump + visa"

She was here working as a model... (or "model" depending on who you want to believe) for several years before getting a green card. If you don't like the term "illegal immigrant" then how about "working and residing in the US illegally?"

she did do some modeling, including nude (but not full frontal) modeling, and you can find the pics pretty easily.

Amazing Republitard voters gave him a pass for all that. Can you imagine what you'd be squawking about Hillary's, or Michelle's characters if they had done some topless photo shoots? I can.

I read the vox and politico pieces - the piece I linked sums them up nicely. They're basically evidence free accusations that are nothing more than a half-assed attempt to make a mountain out of a mole hill because they don't like her husband. They're baseless hit pieces and only a partisan hack would take them seriously. I'm not sure what you expect to happen - should voters reject Trump because of baseless speculation about his wife's immigration status? That seems pretty dumb, even for you. Jane Sanders literally bankrupted a college when she submitted fraudulent documents to get a loan that they ended up defaulting on and you voted for her husband, dirty, smelly, layabout hippy Bernie Sanders who used his position as a US Senator to strong arm those banks into making the ill advised loan (you voted for him multiple times - and bragged about it) and you expect everyone else to not vote for Trump because his wife might have had the wrong visa when she got her picture taken? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

And her "nude" modeling was not even "partial frontal" and was for GQ and pretty standard fare - it's no more nudity than you see in any fashion magazine. I think you're just trying too hard (again) and failing (again). Your outrage here seems pretty hypocritical - aren't you the guy who is saying there's nothing wrong with porn? You are, and now you're trying to discredit the former presidents wife and impugn his supporters for not shunning him over some pretty mainstream, harmless photos of his wife and evidenceless speculation about her immigration status. Kinda rings hallow.
 
Last edited:
Her situation was... dodgy. Read some of the results when you search "Melania Trump + visa"

She was here working as a model... (or "model" depending on who you want to believe) for several years before getting a green card. If you don't like the term "illegal immigrant" then how about "working and residing in the US illegally?"

she did do some modeling, including nude (but not full frontal) modeling, and you can find the pics pretty easily.

Amazing Republitard voters gave him a pass for all that. Can you imagine what you'd be squawking about Hillary's, or Michelle's characters if they had done some topless photo shoots? I can.

please provide some pictures of Melania for us to verify. IF Hillary or Michelle ever had topless photos, I will take your word for it. I do NOT want to see those! :cheers:
 


The GQ pics are pretty tame. Here's a "safe for Detroit Sports Forum" link describing the full frontal pics. She's definitely topless in the pic the NY Post featured (they added the pasties), and it appears from some of the others in the shoot she did from that same shoot that you can find with a simple google search that she posed naked facing the camera in some with her hand over her vag.

A lot of other pics come up that are purportedly of her, but not confirmed.

ANOTHER reminder that the "Christian morals" of the Right are the proverbial "mile wide and an inch deep"... as if we needed another reminder...
 
The GQ pics are pretty tame. Here's a "safe for Detroit Sports Forum" link describing the full frontal pics. She's definitely topless in the pic the NY Post featured (they added the pasties), and it appears from some of the others in the shoot she did from that same shoot that you can find with a simple google search that she posed naked facing the camera in some with her hand over her vag.

A lot of other pics come up that are purportedly of her, but not confirmed.

ANOTHER reminder that the "Christian morals" of the Right are the proverbial "mile wide and an inch deep"... as if we needed another reminder...

What's what with Christian morals. You don't have to answer that..
 
I thought it was a forgone conclusion that Melania Trump had it done nudity, it was well-known, and whoever cared cared and whoever didn?t care didn?t care.


Do I remember correctly early in the republican primaries of 2016, virtuous and patriotic as they were, some PAC associated with Ted Cruz out of Cruz?s control had released nude photos of Melania Trump and Trump responded with releasing unflattering of Ted Cruz?s wife?

And these were the top two Republicans vying for the party nomination, and Trump won.

It is such a surprise that the Republicans did not continue in the White House in 2020.
 
I thought it was a forgone conclusion that Melania Trump had it done nudity, it was well-known, and whoever cared cared and whoever didn?t care didn?t care.


Do I remember correctly early in the republican primaries of 2016, virtuous and patriotic as they were, some PAC associated with Ted Cruz out of Cruz?s control had released nude photos of Melania Trump and Trump responded with releasing unflattering of Ted Cruz?s wife?

And these were the top two Republicans vying for the party nomination, and Trump won.

It is such a surprise that the Republicans did not continue in the White House in 2020.

I actually didn't know until I searched for after Tom's post.
 
The GQ pics are pretty tame. Here's a "safe for Detroit Sports Forum" link describing the full frontal pics. She's definitely topless in the pic the NY Post featured (they added the pasties), and it appears from some of the others in the shoot she did from that same shoot that you can find with a simple google search that she posed naked facing the camera in some with her hand over her vag.

A lot of other pics come up that are purportedly of her, but not confirmed.

ANOTHER reminder that the "Christian morals" of the Right are the proverbial "mile wide and an inch deep"... as if we needed another reminder...

OMG, she's practically a porn star - it's so hypocritical of Christians to forgive and forget rather than refuse to vote for her husband because she posed topless 20 years ago. It would be much more morally defensible if they instead voted for a crooked socialist (who owns four houses) whose wife committed fraud (with his help by abusing the power of his office) that ended up bankrupting a college - at least she didn't get paid to pose topless, as if that was an option...

OIP.LUvXWfX5q-Tcb60078VYvQHaFk


You're really killing it on the moral argument here - it's the Christians that are the hypocrites, how dare they forgive someone you don't like. Good one.
 
Last edited:
You have a choice Christians - the guy whose wife posed topless in her 20s (almost 30 years ago), or the guy whose wife committed bank fraud in her late 50s to secure a loan that would end up bankrupting the college she ran (and oh by the way, she also funneled $500k from the college to a for profit Woodworking School run by her daughter and collected a $200k golden parachute from the school she ran into the ground).

Heads up Christians, if you choose the guy whose wife posed naked, you risk being called a hypocrite by imbeciles in online chat forums.
 
Last edited:
You have a choice Christians - the guy whose wife posed topless in her 20s (almost 30 years ago), or the guy whose wife committed bank fraud in her late 50s to secure a loan that would end up bankrupting the college she ran (and oh by the way, she also funneled $500k from the college to a for profit Woodworking School run by her daughter and collected a $200k golden parachute from the school she ran into the ground).

Heads up Christians, if you choose the guy whose wife posed naked, you risk being called a hypocrite by imbeciles in online chat forums.


gee for someone who doesn't "like him personally, don't think he's a good guy" you sure get awfully personal and upset when anyone criticizes Trump here... even Tigermud doesn't defend Trump as much as you do.

Maybe you can take some pills for that, or see a therapist?
 
gee for someone who doesn't "like him personally, don't think he's a good guy" you sure get awfully personal and upset when anyone criticizes Trump here... even Tigermud doesn't defend Trump as much as you do.

Maybe you can take some pills for that, or see a therapist?

you missed the point again - first, that post wasn't about criticism of Trump, it's about you criticizing Christians calling them hypocrites because they voted for a guy whose wife posed topless 30 years ago. You're literally calling Christian hypocrites because they didn't refuse to forgive someone even though you probably realize forgiveness is a basic tenet of Christianity. You pass judgement on Christians for doing what God calls them to do (forgive) all while voting for a guy whose wife committed a far greater transgression and much more recently. You don't have much room to judge the morals of other people here.

Second, I'm not at all angry, I'm making fun of you. I'll give you some credit though, I doubt you actually missed the point. You're probably just smart enough to realize you're the amoral hypocrite and you can't defend your position so instead you have to deflect and pretend I'm angry even though you probably know I'm laughing my ass off at you.
 
Last edited:
Here?s a shooter for ya.

After ambushing and murdering two cops, this career criminal was justifiable and righteously taken out himself.

Because of an edict passed by Gascon the day he was sworn in, this motherfucker?s family is going to be compensated on the dime of taxpayers of Los Angeles County.

Which includes me.
 
Here?s a shooter for ya.

After ambushing and murdering two cops, this career criminal was justifiable and righteously taken out himself.

Because of an edict passed by Gascon the day he was sworn in, this motherfucker?s family is going to be compensated on the dime of taxpayers of Los Angeles County.

Which includes me.

Ha ha!
 
Maybe I should go to the funeral. There might be a meal in it for me. Get some return on my coin.

do you have formal LA gang banger attire? You'll need a pair of khakis, white tank top, suspenders, a flannel shirt with just the top button buttoned, black sneakers with no laces and dark sunglasses. A wallet chain hanging down past your knee would be a nice touch. Don't risk the bandana hanging out of the pocket - if it's the wrong color, there could be a another funeral you'll be attending as the guest of honor.
 
do you have formal LA gang banger attire? You'll need a pair of khakis, white tank top, suspenders, a flannel shirt with just the top button buttoned, black sneakers with no laces and dark sunglasses. A wallet chain hanging down past your knee would be a nice touch. Don't risk the bandana hanging out of the pocket - if it's the wrong color, there could be a another funeral you'll be attending as the guest of honor.

dang, you're an expert on LA gangbanger culture too.
 
dang, you're an expert on LA gangbanger culture too.

It's not like a big secret or some remote tribe deep in the Amazon (I'm referring to the jungles around the river in South America, not the logistics company founded by your billionaire hero). You don't need a degree in anthropology or even a lot of study - I've seen a few movies and have internet access. If that makes me sound like an expert to you it probably says more about you than it does about me. You're trying too hard - and failing. Again.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top