Emolument clause... read it.
"Emolument" ... look it up.
What Trump did... read about it.
Could you be a more condescending jerk? I doubt it.
I know exactly what it says:
?No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.?
My reading is that it is up to you and your ilk to prove it. If you link another conjecture about what has taken place rather than definitive proof of an impeachable offense, you lose all respect and the argument.
. . .and you can read it also you tool - you obviously don't know every damn thing about it. There are questions both legal and ethical concerning whether it applies or not.
link to a huff po article for you
Even a biased handling of the issue leaves open the fact that there are still questions that have no final answer yet.
I stand by my statement, tripling down as it were, it is only impeachable under the Constitution in your eyes, because it isn't some libtard getting money for speeches for favorable rulings, but rather a hated Republican.