Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Was Palmer's pass attempt our Marion Barber?

upnorth

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Messages
219
Not sure of the logic of that 3rd down pass attempt...
 
You could add that 3rd to last play when he held on to the ball too long and got sacked. Had to use a TO. That was a barber.
 
That's what I said during the game thread. I said we needed someone to Marion Barber and that was it.
 
Running the play would of ran it down to the two minute warning. That would of been only an extra 18 seconds off the clock.

Tough to argue with the play, it worked, just a little off on the throw and catch. He was open though.
 
Remember the Jets game last season? With the late late 4th quarter pass attempt on 3rd down by the Lions - instead of running the ball, which would have taken a whole lot of time off the clock - which gave Sanchez & Co just enough time to get into position for the game tying field goal, and the Jets eventually won in OT?

Man, was that dumbass...
 
Just when I started bagging on Linehan, the Raiders OC appeared and stole the show.
 
The Lions scored with plenty of time....not sure that running the ball there would've made a difference
 
Linehan is a clueless tool in terms of clock management. They should have run on at least one of the plays inside the Raider 20 to force them to burn a TO or eat clock. The incomplete passes are what gave them the chance to even try the FG. If they had burned their TOs or clock, they don't even get to send the FG team out.
 
zyxt9 said:
Linehan is a clueless tool in terms of clock management. They should have run on at least one of the plays inside the Raider 20 to force them to burn a TO or eat clock. The incomplete passes are what gave them the chance to even try the FG. If they had burned their TOs or clock, they don't even get to send the FG team out.

You want the Lions to run the ball, not pass? When you have under a minute left you want to score and we don't score running the ball. Pass, all day every day.
 
[color=#006400 said:
Mitch[/color]]
zyxt9 said:
Linehan is a clueless tool in terms of clock management. They should have run on at least one of the plays inside the Raider 20 to force them to burn a TO or eat clock. The incomplete passes are what gave them the chance to even try the FG. If they had burned their TOs or clock, they don't even get to send the FG team out.

You want the Lions to run the ball, not pass? When you have under a minute left you want to score and we don't score running the ball. Pass, all day every day.

No reason to throw the ball with over a minute to play inside the 20 when down 6 and the opponent has a kicker with a strong leg. Run one play, just to make them burn a TO or clock. You don't want to leave them with 30+ seconds and 2 TOs. Too easily translated into a FG chance. Sure Suh blocked the kick, but I'd venture to say the odds of blocking a kick are less than the odds Janikowski makes that FG if he gets it off clean. Lady Luck was on their side, and I'm happy for it...just pointing out that Linehan is terrible at clock management. As someone pointed out, his inability to properly manage the clock was a big part in why the Jets beat the Lions last year.

If SJ makes that kick today, everyone would be stating what I just did and you know it. Sure it would have broken the longest NFL FG record...but SJ is the one who set that record and today's kick would have only been 2 yards longer, so he is absolutely capable of making it from there.
 
I'm sure clock management was way down the priority list... Linehan's only concern should have been to make absolute, 100% sure that the Lions score a TD. Which they did.
 
upnorth said:
I'm sure clock management was way down the priority list... Linehan's only concern should have been to make absolute, 100% sure that the Lions score a TD. Which they did.

Yes. I mean they scored with 39 seconds left. So they did what they needed.
 
zyxt9 said:
[color=#006400 said:
Mitch[/color]]

You want the Lions to run the ball, not pass? When you have under a minute left you want to score and we don't score running the ball. Pass, all day every day.
Sure Suh blocked the kick, but I'd venture to say the odds of blocking a kick are less than the odds Janikowski makes that FG if he gets it off clean.

With a kick of that distance its going to have to be very low. It's not surprising that it gets blocked or a finger on it. The guy is good and makes 50% of his 50+ field goals. But an extra 15 yards is a huge difference. I'm not sure the chances of him making it are all that great.

Lets not forget the 63 yard field goal was kicked in Denver.
 
Good thing we didn't have to find out. Do they still have the rule about taking a helmet off on the field of play? I was worried Suh might get penalized. That would have sucked.
 
I expected to go for a single run play near the end just to get the clock down a bit. But, which CJ doing what he was doing, taking the touchdown is always preferable. Look, the Raiders only had like 35 seconds to get into field goal position. Any decent defense should have been able to hold them down that long.

Two DBs failed to stop a long pass to the TE who was right next to them. We failed to cover the sidelines with 8 seconds left and that gave them a chance at the 67 yarder (would have been over 70 with an incompletion). Bag on the offensive playcalling (TOUCHDOWN) all you want, but the defense shouldn't have put themselves in position to NEED to block that kick.
 
everyoneneedsasmil said:
I expected to go for a single run play near the end just to get the clock down a bit. But, which CJ doing what he was doing, taking the touchdown is always preferable. Look, the Raiders only had like 35 seconds to get into field goal position. Any decent defense should have been able to hold them down that long.

Two DBs failed to stop a long pass to the TE who was right next to them. We failed to cover the sidelines with 8 seconds left and that gave them a chance at the 67 yarder (would have been over 70 with an incompletion). Bag on the offensive playcalling (TOUCHDOWN) all you want, but the defense shouldn't have put themselves in position to NEED to block that kick.

A little unlucky as well. Before the sidelines pass, it looked like Palmer was going to complete a pass in the field of play and have clock run out but he dropped it. I'm okay with how the last drive played out, Janokowski or no Janokowski. I'm just glad no penalties.

In the end I think my "please don't make it, please don't make it" begging did the trick.

:)
 
Did anyone else think they spotted the final kick too close, I thought they were at the 49 and you usually line up 8 yards back for longer kicks, add the end zone and I thought they should have been lining up for a 67 yard FG. It was going to be a lower kick and I think they lined up at 6 or 7 yards back, so that's a lot better chance for it to be blocked.
 
Back
Top