Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

We have the best grammar in the league

If someone goes to a game, please bring a sign that says "True Win" if we lose and hold it up.
 
Every game is technically a true win

Nope need to watch the game tape, injuries and bad calls to figure that out.

Lions lost at Carolina and at New England last year. Maybe at Arizona and at Green Bay. That is borderline.
 
Nope need to watch the game tape, injuries and bad calls to figure that out.

Lions lost at Carolina and at New England last year. Maybe at Arizona and at Green Bay. That is borderline.

That's a bit pessimistic on Carolina, 2 fumbles lost isn't normal plus Freese sucked again missing 2 FGs.

Missing Dig, Van Noy, Bentley, Carey, and they were basically without a RT.

Easily could've had a shot.
 
That's a bit pessimistic on Carolina, 2 fumbles lost isn't normal plus Freese sucked again missing 2 FGs.

Missing Dig, Van Noy, Bentley, Carey, and they were basically without a RT.

Easily could've had a shot.

By that logic, after every loss a team should say "we easily had a shot".

Missed field goals, fumbles lost, and end zone drops are self inflicted bullshit. In no way did they come close to "easily" having a shot.

Unless of course you mean they played a completely different football game and didn't make multiple mistakes. Then by all means, I guess they "had a shot". But again, every team can say that.
 
Last edited:
By that logic, after every loss a team should say "we easily had a shot".

Missed field goals, fumbles lost, and end zone drops are self inflicted bullshit. In no way did they come close to "easily" having a shot.

So negative, gosh
 
That's a bit pessimistic on Carolina, 2 fumbles lost isn't normal plus Freese sucked again missing 2 FGs.

Missing Dig, Van Noy, Bentley, Carey, and they were basically without a RT.

Easily could've had a shot.

LKP is easily the most negative poster here. He gives Stafford no credit. Assumes he needs perfection around him to be successful. No faith he can produce on his own.

Looks for any call, bounce, weather phenomenon to excuse the Lion's losses. Again no faith they can overcome these common obstacles every team faces. Essentially expects them to lose if anything goes wrong. So negative.

LKP is simply a hater. Closet Packer fan.
 
That's a bit pessimistic on Carolina, 2 fumbles lost isn't normal plus Freese sucked again missing 2 FGs.

Missing Dig, Van Noy, Bentley, Carey, and they were basically without a RT.

Easily could've had a shot.

Our defense didn't play very well though and we had Tulloch/Fairley. The fumbles were forced not flukes in that one. The pick was a fluke though. 2 missed field goals were an issue too. Borderline but I gave Carolina the benefit in that one.

I'm glad we get playoff caliber teams at home this year. Green Bay, Denver, Arizona can come to the noise at Ford Field.
 
LKP is easily the most negative poster here. He gives Stafford no credit. Assumes he needs perfection around him to be successful. No faith he can produce on his own.

Looks for any call, bounce, weather phenomenon to excuse the Lion's losses. Again no faith they can overcome these common obstacles every team faces. Essentially expects them to lose if anything goes wrong. So negative.

LKP is simply a hater. Closet Packer fan.

I'm the only one who points out when the team does well and when Stafford and Mayhew do well (which is most of the time). They only lose because of the injuries and refs. I'm the only positive poster on here.
 
I'm the only one who points out when the team does well and when Stafford and Mayhew do well (which is most of the time). They only lose because of the injuries and refs. I'm the only positive poster on here.

So negative.

How come you give Stafford no credit. Why do you think he needs perfect offensive line, an elite run game and an elite #1 and secondary receiving weapons to be successful? How come you don't think he can be successful with average people around him? How come you don't think he can overcome adversity?

Is it because you are a Packer fan? It would explain a lot.

Of course a Packer fan would want Stafford to stay in his position for years to come at a highly paid salary. Of course a Packer fan would want his opponents GM to stay in charge when he routinely misses on high picks. Of course a Packer fan would want to run the best DT in the league in Suh out of the division by calling him greedy. Of course a Packer fan would want to convince opposing teams that their team is good enough to win it all, all the time knowing they will finish second in the division to LKP's Packers.
 
So negative.

How come you give Stafford no credit. Why do you think he needs perfect offensive line, an elite run game and an elite #1 and secondary receiving weapons to be successful? How come you don't think he can be successful with average people around him? How come you don't think he can overcome adversity?

Is it because you are a Packer fan? It would explain a lot.

Of course a Packer fan would want Stafford to stay in his position for years to come at a highly paid salary. Of course a Packer fan would want his opponents GM to stay in charge when he routinely misses on high picks. Of course a Packer fan would want to run the best DT in the league in Suh out of the division by calling him greedy. Of course a Packer fan would want to convince opposing teams that their team is good enough to win it all, all the time knowing they will finish second in the division to LKP's Packers.

Stafford is a good QB. He did well without an Oline and run game. 11 wins. Stafford and I just proved you wrong.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top