Sbee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2013
- Messages
- 9,259
Picking and choosing science for a convenient defense of abortion is subjective. When a fertilized egg becomes uniquely human is not subject to debate. At conception, it has it's own unique human DNA and by the time a woman knows she is pregnant the baby has a measurable heartbeat. Not to mention, many abortions are performed well beyond the point where the baby has a developed central nervous system and can absolutely feel pain. Arguments from viability outside the womb, all the way up to Peter Singer's insane "philosophy" is just arbitrary nonsense that pro abortionists masquerade as science to justify this barbaric practice.
still doesn't address the issue of personhood, when those cells are afforded the status of being a person is subjective.
Using your argument about being uniquely human, you'd have to give legal rights to frozen embryos from in-vitro fertilization. If someone goes through an IVF cycle and has 8 embryos, they would have to transfer all 8 embryos at some time to not interfere with the rights of the embryos.
Since it's ambiguous, let the individual make their own moral, religious, or philosophical judgement.
Last edited: