- Thread Author
- #1
detroit1811
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 720
I haven't posted here in a long time, but have been lurking around from time to time. Either way with a new GM and HC in place the biggest question of the off-season is obviously what will happen at the QB position. Just wanted to see what everybody's thoughts were on what is going to happen.
I'll be the first to say I am a huge Stafford fan. I agree he is not a top 5 guy and he can be borderline top 10, but I am grateful he has been a Lion for as long as he has. The guy is as tough as they come and he never complains about the hand he has been given here. Everyday he just comes to work and gives his all. He will go down as one of personal favorite Lions of all time.
With that said this is the first year since he has been with us where trading him is a realistic option. He has two years left on his deal at a reasonable salary for QB's nowadays. On top of that he realistically still has 3-5 good years left. With that said he can be a very valuable commodity to a team that has a good roster needing a major upgrade at quarterback. I would say teams that fit that bill are Denver, Chicago, Indianapolis, New Orleans, New England, Pittsburgh, and Washington. Of those teams I would eliminate Chicago (division), New Orleans (bad cap situation), and Pittsburgh (bad cap situation. Of the rest I think Washington and Indianapolis probably make the most sense, but I wouldn't discount Denver and New England.
I think gauging his value is gonna be very tough. I think any trade would obviously start with a first round pick, but IMO if thats all we can get then I would hold onto him because to me thats just not enough. Obviously netting multiple first rounders would be the ideal scenario (think Jay Cutler), but Stafford's age and recent injury history probably takes that out of the equation. I do think he is worth a good bit more then when Sam Bradford got traded (1st and 4th). So maybe something along the lines of a 1st, future 2nd, and another 2nd this year(or less depending on where the 1st round pick is). Denver(9th), New England (15th), Washington (19th), and Indianapolis (21), all have first round picks.
The Washington Football Team have an extra 3rd rounder this year and have a good enough team, in a very weak division to be desperate enough to get a quarterback of Stafford's caliber. If they offered their first, both 3rd's and a 2nd next year, should we pull the trigger? Just food for thought and if anyone has any other thoughts feel free to share.
I personally think that if you look at our roster, I think it would take some excellent drafting and some very good bargains to hit in in FA to be competitive this coming year and maybe even the following. Would also take some big steps forwards from some young guys currently on the roster. If thats the case we may waste another 1-2 years of Stafford's career and when we are ready to compete he might be on his way out (also due another lucrative contract). Why not get the draft capital and start building a team alongside a rookie QB on a cheap contract. Maybe sign Winston for this year who should be cheap and is not a terrible option is you can get someone to cut back on his turnovers while we get this thing figured out.
I'll be the first to say I am a huge Stafford fan. I agree he is not a top 5 guy and he can be borderline top 10, but I am grateful he has been a Lion for as long as he has. The guy is as tough as they come and he never complains about the hand he has been given here. Everyday he just comes to work and gives his all. He will go down as one of personal favorite Lions of all time.
With that said this is the first year since he has been with us where trading him is a realistic option. He has two years left on his deal at a reasonable salary for QB's nowadays. On top of that he realistically still has 3-5 good years left. With that said he can be a very valuable commodity to a team that has a good roster needing a major upgrade at quarterback. I would say teams that fit that bill are Denver, Chicago, Indianapolis, New Orleans, New England, Pittsburgh, and Washington. Of those teams I would eliminate Chicago (division), New Orleans (bad cap situation), and Pittsburgh (bad cap situation. Of the rest I think Washington and Indianapolis probably make the most sense, but I wouldn't discount Denver and New England.
I think gauging his value is gonna be very tough. I think any trade would obviously start with a first round pick, but IMO if thats all we can get then I would hold onto him because to me thats just not enough. Obviously netting multiple first rounders would be the ideal scenario (think Jay Cutler), but Stafford's age and recent injury history probably takes that out of the equation. I do think he is worth a good bit more then when Sam Bradford got traded (1st and 4th). So maybe something along the lines of a 1st, future 2nd, and another 2nd this year(or less depending on where the 1st round pick is). Denver(9th), New England (15th), Washington (19th), and Indianapolis (21), all have first round picks.
The Washington Football Team have an extra 3rd rounder this year and have a good enough team, in a very weak division to be desperate enough to get a quarterback of Stafford's caliber. If they offered their first, both 3rd's and a 2nd next year, should we pull the trigger? Just food for thought and if anyone has any other thoughts feel free to share.
I personally think that if you look at our roster, I think it would take some excellent drafting and some very good bargains to hit in in FA to be competitive this coming year and maybe even the following. Would also take some big steps forwards from some young guys currently on the roster. If thats the case we may waste another 1-2 years of Stafford's career and when we are ready to compete he might be on his way out (also due another lucrative contract). Why not get the draft capital and start building a team alongside a rookie QB on a cheap contract. Maybe sign Winston for this year who should be cheap and is not a terrible option is you can get someone to cut back on his turnovers while we get this thing figured out.