Wide spread election fraud 2020

[Spartanmack]

Did you know Wallace Shawn is a socialist?

I hope I just ruined the movie for Sptartamack, like I ruined Star Trek for my dad when I told him Mr. Sulu is gay.

Project much? That's your team's m.o. I’m not a bed-wetting crybaby leftist authoritarian sissy like you. So unlike you, I don’t need athletes or entertainers to agree with me on political, economic or social issues to enjoy their work. I can disagree with someone’s beliefs and still enjoy their work and if I don’t enjoy it, I don’t blame it on their politics. And I don’t join cancel campaigns when I find out an athlete or entertainer thinks differently than I do.

By the way, that article is one of the dumbest things I've ever read - I'm not surprised you're impressed by it given it reinforces the same stupid misunderstandings of the world you vomit all over this board daily.

 

[Michchamp]

Project much? That's your team's m.o. I?m not a bed-wetting crybaby leftist authoritarian sissy like you. So unlike you, I don?t need athletes or entertainers to agree with me on political, economic or social issues to enjoy their work. I can disagree with someone?s beliefs and still enjoy their work and if I don?t enjoy it, I don?t blame it on their politics. And I don?t join cancel campaigns when I find out an athlete or entertainer thinks differently than I do.

By the way, that article is one of the dumbest things I've ever read - I'm not surprised you're impressed by it given it reinforces the same stupid misunderstandings of the world you vomit all over this board daily.

 

[tigermud]

It's over SC rejects PA case. Harris will be president it's only a matter of time, Biden already told us so

No we don't think you're kidding Joe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6b8yNaKExvA

The next four years are going to get much worse. Dark Winter, followed by medical tyranny, higher taxes, massive increase is costs of everything followed by a global reset leaving everyone with a equally assured misery for all Chicom Authoritarian take over.

 

[tigermud]

While it pains me to see people mistake socialism for an ideal, I don't blame them. We screwed up our capitalism so bad, it sounds like a good idea in comparison. Not completely unlike how people got so sick of politics as usual, Trump sounded like a good idea.

And the solutions will be far worse than the disease just like the covid lockdowns.

 

[sggatecl]

It's over SC rejects PA case.

9-0 decision

Scotus deep state confirmed.

 

[tigermud]

9-0 decision

Scotus deep state confirmed.

It’s still up to the state legislatures but I don’t see much reason to believe they’ll want to upset any apple carts. The republic is lost. China accomplished their goal

 

[Spartanmack]

You’re projecting again. Just like I don’t get upset with athletes and entertainers I disagree with, I also don’t get upset with clowns on DSF I disagree with. Good try though.

 

[Spartanmack]

9-0 decision

Scotus deep state confirmed.

So just to be clear, you think there?s nothing wrong with the PA SC changing the PA constitution just before the election and that?s proof there was no fraud committed?

 

[Spartanmack]

I wonder where all these crackpot ideas about Biden being compromised by his crackhead son’s dealings (at his direction) with the Chinese Communist Party come from. And the idea that TRump is somehow different - he’s just as corrupt and compromised.

3:30 and 9:30...

https://youtu.be/OwGLItcb498

Just more zero evidence that crackhead Hunter Biden is a conduit of Joe’s corruption that doesn’t exist.

 

[sggatecl]

So just to be clear, you think there’s nothing wrong with the PA SC changing the PA constitution just before the election and that’s proof there was no fraud committed?

Just to be clear, I'm making fun of how every time something doesn't go Trump's way lately it's a deep seeded, unprovable conspiracy. No need to look any deeper that that.

I mean, if it's as egregious as you claim it is, surely the Supreme Court would see that right?

 

[Spartanmack]

Just to be clear, I'm making fun of how every time something doesn't go Trump's way lately it's a deep seeded, unprovable conspiracy. No need to look any deeper that that.

I mean, if it's as egregious as you claim it is, surely the Supreme Court would see that right?

So you’re completely ignorant to the fact that the PA SC, a majority Democrat court arbitrarily abrogated the PA constitution shortly before the election voiding constitutional requirements that ballots contain a signature, that the signature match the signature on file, that they be postmarked on or before Election Day and allowed for virtually any ballot to be counted regardless without meeting even the slightest measure to ensure election security. Presumably, you’re also completely ignorant of all the shady things that witnesses say went on in Philadelphia as they attempted to observe and ensure election security. Can you maybe at least see how this makes it kinda difficult to prove fraud, particularly when the courts won’t enforce the laws and allow for signature audit counts of ballots in these disputed precincts? Despite being completely ignorant of all this, you’re comfortable making fun of people presenting evidence and challenging the results saying they’re just butthurt because the courts are choosing not to hear cases about how the courts themselves violated the constitution. And in your mind, despite being completely ignorant of these details, there’s no possible explanation for why the US SC wouldn’t hear the case other than the election clearly must be legitimate? That about sum it up - you know nothing about the details, but have know enough to say people seeking answers are conspiracy theorists?

 

[sggatecl]

So you?re completely ignorant to the fact that the PA SC, a majority Democrat court arbitrarily abrogated the PA constitution shortly before the election voiding constitutional requirements that ballots contain a signature, that the signature match the signature on file, that they be postmarked on or before Election Day and allowed for virtually any ballot to be counted regardless without meeting even the slightest measure to ensure election security. Presumably, you?re also completely ignorant of all the shady things that witnesses say went on in Philadelphia as they attempted to observe and ensure election security. Despite being completely ignorant of all this, you?re comfortable making fun of people presenting evidence and challenging the results saying they?re just butthurt because the courts are choosing not to hear cases about how they violated the constitution. And in your mind, despite being completely ignorant of these details, there?s no possible explanation for why the US SC wouldn?t hear the case other than the election clearly must be legitimate? That about sum it up - you know nothing about the details, but have know enough to say people seeking answers are conspiracy theorists?

You can call me ignorant until you're blue in the face.

I'm completely comfortable. Yes.

If this was a situation where one blue court was the sole reason Trump couldn't 'rightfully' overturn the election and preside for another 4 glorious years (that has a nice authoritarian ring to it, eh?) it would be one thing. But after 50+ petitions and lawsuits in multiple state courts have been rejected, it starts to smell like sour grapes after a while. There's SOOO much evidence but essentially none of the courts agree. I don't like Trump. Trump is your guy. You can waste your energy being mad about the court rulings, why would I? One more month and he'll be of zero consequence to me ever again.

 

[sggatecl]

Looks like the Detroit Lions record over the last 5 years.
Worse actually.

 

[Spartanmack]

You can call me ignorant until you're blue in the face.

I'm completely comfortable. Yes.

If this was a situation where one blue court was the sole reason Trump couldn't 'rightfully' overturn the election and preside for another 4 glorious years (that has a nice authoritarian ring to it, eh?) it would be one thing. But after 50+ petitions and lawsuits in multiple state courts have been rejected, it starts to smell like sour grapes after a while. There's SOOO much evidence but essentially none of the courts agree. I don't like Trump. Trump is your guy. You can waste your energy being mad about the court rulings, why would I? One more month and he'll be of zero consequence to me ever again.

I’m not calling you ignorant, I’m asking if you are aware or ignorant of those details. Why would it only matter if it overturned the result of an election? What the PA SC did was a clear violation the PA constitution. I’m not so much mad about it, I’m disappointed at what appears to be institutional failure if not partisan fraud on a pretty large scale or at least at some pretty high levels. Democrats in Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia seem to be given license to do whatever they want with ballot counting/security (I’m less familiar with the cases in WI, NV and AZ and know even less about this Dominion stuff so I haven’t talked about any of those). What happened in just those 3 cities very possibly could have changed the election results. That should concern everyone. I don’t think it’s conspiracy theory paranoia to want to make sure those results are legitimate. If the other side is so confident it’s legit, what’s the harm in proving it with signature verified recounts in those 3 districts. I would have no problem if team Biden wanted to do the same if they had similar concerns about reported activity in districts won by Trump.

I also find it hilarious that Dems and the press think they have a leg to stand on mocking Republicans for refusing to accept the results of an election. It’s quite possibly the single biggest hypocrisy of people who’ve made a career of being hypocrites.

 

[sggatecl]

I’m not calling you ignorant, I’m asking if you are aware or ignorant of those details. Why would it only matter if it overturned the result of an election? What the PA SC did was a clear violation the PA constitution. I’m not mad about any of it - I’m disappointed at what appears to be institutional failure on a pretty large scale. Democrats in Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia seem to be given license to do whatever they want with ballot counting/security (I’m less familiar with the cases in WI, NV and AZ and know even less about this Dominion stuff so I haven’t talked about any of those). What happened in just those 3 cities very possibly could have changed the election results. That should concern everyone. I don’t think it’s conspiracy theory paranoia to want to make sure those results are legitimate. If the other side is so confident it’s legit, what’s the harm in proving it with signature verified recounts in those 3 districts. I would have no problem if team Biden wanted to do the same if they had similar concerns about reported activity in districts won by Trump.

Let's put it this way. I don't think I'm ignorant per say, but I don't think I'm nearly as knowledgeable as the people that work in law for a living. I've never had a problem deferring to people more educated on a topic than I am. Nowadays you got people with high school degrees challenging scientists, scholars, doctors, etc in their fields and it's mind blowing. Some real Dunning–Kruger shit hard at work.

I was so hyped up that Mueller was going to nail Trump to a wall. And when he didn't I was like...oh...well that sucks. Guess things weren't as egregious as I thought they were. And I moved on. I don't see that happening here, though I hope I'm wrong.

 

[Spartanmack]

Let's put it this way. I don't think I'm ignorant per say, but I don't think I'm nearly as knowledgeable as the people that work in law for a living. I've never had a problem deferring to people more educated on a topic than I am. Nowadays you got people with high school degrees challenging scientists, scholars, doctors, etc in their fields and it's mind blowing. Some real Dunning?Kruger shit hard at work.

It?s probably more accurate to say like a lot of people, you defer to authority that confirms your desired outcome. The argument from authority, particularly on subjective matters such as the election and the related cases is an extremely weak one. It?s not much stronger for thing like COVID and climate change for many reasons. First consensus, even if it exists isn?t proof of anything and as has been pointed out here by several people, many times there are scientists, doctors and scholars on the other side of virtually every major topic.

 

[sggatecl]

It’s probably more accurate to say like a lot of people, you defer to authority that confirms your desired outcome.

I don't want to stop eating steak and chicken, but I believe when scientists say super farms are terrible for the environment.

I don't want to have an injection every single month to keep my auto immune disease at bay but I trust the doctors that say I need it.

I wanted Trump to get impeached from both Senate and House because his transgressions were egregious enough to warrant it but they weren't.

The list goes on. There are plenty of different scenarios where I could side with the 'other experts' you mention. The Andrew Wakefield's and Francis Crick's of the world are not even close to representative of their fields of expertise.

 

[Spartanmack]

I don't want to stop eating steak and chicken, but I believe when scientists say super farms are terrible for the environment.

I don't want to have an injection every single month to keep my auto immune disease at bay but I trust the doctors that say I need it.

I wanted Trump to get impeached from both Senate and House because his transgressions were egregious enough to warrant it but they weren't.

The list goes on. There are plenty of different scenarios where I could side with the 'other experts' you mention. The Andrew Wakefield's and Francis Crick's of the world are not even close to representative of their fields of expertise.

Then buy local organic grass fed beef and free range chickens. We are looking into it for beef but primarily for health reasons. Although I do agree big agribusiness is generally bad for the environment, my concern is about polluting the air, land and water not about the accc boogie man.

Get the shots - is anyone telling you not to? My current doctor is the second dr who wants me to take a low dose antibiotic 2x a day for the rest of my life to treat rosacea. Personally, I’d rather have occasional rosacea flare ups than take the risk my body builds up a resistance to antibiotics, even if it is a small risk.

They weren’t. It was a complete and total witch hunt based on a illegal investigation that found no evidence of any crimes by Trump or his campaign, for which I would like to see several people go to jail.

You can make the list as long as you want, just be aware that a lot of the things you believe will be disputed by other credible experts who disagree with the ones you listen to.

 

[tinselwolverine]

I don't want to stop eating steak and chicken, but I believe when scientists say super farms are terrible for the environment.

I don't want to have an injection every single month to keep my auto immune disease at bay but I trust the doctors that say I need it.

I wanted Trump to get impeached from both Senate and House because his transgressions were egregious enough to warrant it but they weren't.

The list goes on. There are plenty of different scenarios where I could side with the 'other experts' you mention. The Andrew Wakefield's and Francis Crick's of the world are not even close to representative of their fields of expertise.

Wait...what?

Do you have a diagnosed auto-immune disorder?

For the love of God...hate to hear that.

Take care and stay safe.

 

[sggatecl]

Wait...what?

Do you have a diagnosed auto-immune disorder?

For the love of God...hate to hear that.

Take care and stay safe.

Thanks, I appreciate that. Since I was able to get back on insurance, thanks Obama(care), I've been able to manage things better. Meds suck but they work.

Lately the worst part is just staying inside so much. I'm fuckin bored.