Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Wide spread election fraud 2020

A drunk Michigander, sure. If you had to help Guiliani "tuck in his shirt" before the court meeting you'd need a couple drinks too.

Even Cecily Strong as Lady Gretchen was ?nursin? a Labatt?s...?

Don?t think she would ever be helping Giuliani tuck in his shirt though.

Neither would Cecily nor Gretchen.

Although Cecily and the Trumps do seem to at least like each other.
 
"legally-cast" should not be hyphenated.


I thought when you string together a phrase with non-adjectives to form an adjective, hypens were the proper (though often forgotten) way to do it.
 
Last edited:
I thought when you string together a phrase with non-adjectives to form an adjective, hypens were the proper (though often forgotten) way to do it.

“hyphens” should not be spelled without the “h”.

edit: second "h"
 
Last edited:
I thought when you string together a phrase with non-adjectives to form an adjective, hypens were the proper (though often forgotten) way to do it.

Hyphenated phrases modify a noun.

"well-dressed person"

"legally cast ballot"

Both "well" and "legally" are adverbs, but never hyphenate an adverb that ends in "ly"; it's not necessary.
 
Hyphenated phrases modify a noun.

"well-dressed person"

"legally cast ballot"

Both "well" and "legally" are adverbs, but never hyphenate an adverb that ends in "ly"; it's not necessary.


Good one. I didn't know that.
 
Sadly, it?s too late - apparently all you need is one (probably) nervous person to struggle through their testimony to discredit all other witnesses no matter how coherent and well presented their testimony may be.

haha You're trying to say the obviously drunk lady was just nervous
 
haha You're trying to say the obviously drunk lady was just nervous

I don't think it's obvious she was drunk - seems more likely that she's a fool, in over her head who think's she's a lot smarter than she is. Like a female version of you.
 
haha You're trying to say the obviously drunk lady was just nervous

I'm less amused by that and more amused how all of the sudden individual testimony, or "TRUTH BOMBS" as the rags call them, are supposed to be hard evidence.

Over the last few years I was told that kind of testimony can only go so far when it comes to electing presidents and appointing supreme court judges. Now we're supposed to take away votes in elections on the word of some red hats.
 
I'm less amused by that and more amused how all of the sudden individual testimony, or "TRUTH BOMBS" as the rags call them, are supposed to be hard evidence.

Over the last few years I was told that kind of testimony can only go so far when it comes to electing presidents and appointing supreme court judges. Now we're supposed to take away votes in elections on the word of some red hats.

Who said that? What they're asking for is an investigation - witness testimony is just a part of the process.
 
I'm less amused by that and more amused how all of the sudden individual testimony, or "TRUTH BOMBS" as the rags call them, are supposed to be hard evidence.

Over the last few years I was told that kind of testimony can only go so far when it comes to electing presidents and appointing supreme court judges. Now we're supposed to take away votes in elections on the word of some red hats.

No, but these are people who submitted affidavits that merit some measure of additional investigation.
 
I don't think it's obvious she was drunk - seems more likely that she's a fool, in over her head who think's she's a lot smarter than she is. Like a female version of you.

sorry for making fun of your girlfriend
 
Copying from Parler isn?t the easiest thing in the world and I should have known better than a Hannity link he?s such a blowhard

https://video.parler.com/w2/ku/w2kuzcsWNYg3.mp4

I'm sure there were probably 13,000 votes under that desk. Case closed, Georgia belongs to Trump. Biden 290 - Trump 248

Now it's up to Michigan and and Pennsylvania to produce physical evidence and flip the election to Trump.
 
Back
Top