Wow, we're really trying to start a war with Iran now

[Michchamp]

I thought this was more bluster, but apparently Bolton & co, are desperate to get a casus belli in place before they lose the empty suit in the White House, and the opportunity passes.

 

[tigermud]

China as well, it's no win situation, appeasement wasn't and option either. it's inevitable, not if but when.

https://www.newstimes.com/technolog...or-a-people-s-war-against-the-US-13843480.php

 

[TheVictors]

you called it long ago, MC .........it's all DISTRACTION from the real shit ...SC nominees, vacancies, anti-media ...Iran is merely a pawn.


Oh, look CHINA TRADE TARIFFS!!!!!

 

[Spartanmack]

at this point, shouldn't the conversation be just about the order? Should it be:

Iran, China, Russia or
Iran, Russia, China or
China, Russia, Iran or
China, Iran, Russia or
Russia, China, Iran or
Russia, Iran, China?

I suppose we could go after Iran and one of the other two at the same time - it would make the decision tree a lot simpler. Anything more aggressive than that and we risk stretching ourselves too thin.

 

[tigermud]

This was all predicted many many years ago at which any record of seemly been forbidden from internet archives, I've searched for it for years and it just isn't there. If this is universal repetitive time loop condition I'll try to remember the finer details and timelines better next time I see it in the next cycle, this cycle now looks to be locked in and foregone concluded.

 

[TheVictors]

Trump's a fag, tbh

 

[byco42]

I thought this was more bluster, but apparently Bolton & co, are desperate to get a casus belli in place before they lose the empty suit in the White House, and the opportunity passes.

Yes and you better be on board for the big win or hide your a33 somewhere in Terhan (sic) and see how you like it compared to America of the United States, you pinko commie punk.

 

[Mitchrapp]

Trump's a fag, tbh

He's a cigarette?

 

[tinselwolverine]

at this point, shouldn't the conversation be just about the order? Should it be:

Iran, China, Russia or
Iran, Russia, China or
China, Russia, Iran or
China, Iran, Russia or
Russia, China, Iran or
Russia, Iran, China?

I suppose we could go after Iran and one of the other two at the same time - it would make the decision tree a lot simpler. Anything more aggressive than that and we risk stretching ourselves too thin.

It should be Russia then.

Just to prove there was no collusion.

 

[Spartanmack]

It should be Russia then.

Just to prove there was no collusion.

haven't you been paying attention? It's already been proved. but, to your point, going to war with them should leave no doubt, so maybe they should be first.

the order doesn't really matter that much to me, so long as we go to war with at least 2 of them.

 

[tinselwolverine]

haven't you been paying attention? It's already been proved. but, to your point, going to war with them should leave no doubt, so maybe they should be first.

the order doesn't really matter that much to me, so long as we go to war with at least 2 of them.

Exactly.

And it would also leave no doubt that there was no obstruction.

No collusion, no obstruction.

Utter and complete exoneration.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q03uA3qU95k

 

[jwlcosu]

Don’t worry fellas. Unless Iran does something utterly outrageous, there’s not going to be a war. But this thread does give a few of you the opportunity to continue to appear stupid.

 

[Michchamp]

Don?t worry fellas. Unless Iran does something utterly outrageous, there?s not going to be a war. But this thread does give a few of you the opportunity to continue to appear stupid.

Well, we're already falsifying evidence to justify it, we've threatened them, pulled out of the nuclear deal, embargoed them, have military forces *literally surrounding them in neighboring nations*, have pressured and threatened other countries to stop trading with them, sent MORE warships to their shores with explicit threats from our political leadership...

...Now as long as THEY don't do something outrageous, we won't go to war.

Wonder what percentage of Registered Republitards will enlist to fight this one?

0.01%? 0.0002%

 

[tinselwolverine]

Well, we're already falsifying evidence to justify it, we've threatened them, pulled out of the nuclear deal, embargoed them, have military forces *literally surrounding them in neighboring nations*, have pressured and threatened other countries to stop trading with them, sent MORE warships to their shores with explicit threats from our political leadership...

...Now as long as THEY don't do something outrageous, we won't go to war.

When you put it that way?I wouldn?t fuck with us if I was them.

 

[Spartanmack]

Well, we're already falsifying evidence to justify it, we've threatened them, pulled out of the nuclear deal, embargoed them, have military forces *literally surrounding them in neighboring nations*, have pressured and threatened other countries to stop trading with them, sent MORE warships to their shores with explicit threats from our political leadership...

...Now as long as THEY don't do something outrageous, we won't go to war.

Wonder what percentage of Registered Republitards will enlist to fight this one?

0.01%? 0.0002%

this is what jwlcousa just doesn't get - the world's leading sponsor of terror is just trying to get along peacefully in the world, like an innocent baby (once they wipe Israel off the map and kill all the Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Atheists and Sunni Muslims) but the evil USA just won't stop provoking it so our billionaires can get even more money. Maybe someday he'll understand we're the great Satan if not, mere puppets doing Israel's bidding.

 

[Spartanmack]

When you put it that way?I wouldn?t fuck with us if I was them.

I totally would.

 

[Michchamp]

this is what jwlcousa just doesn't get - the world's leading sponsor of terror is just trying to get along peacefully in the world, like an innocent baby (once they wipe Israel off the map and kill all the Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Atheists and Sunni Muslims) but the evil USA just won't stop provoking it so our billionaires can get even more money. Maybe someday he'll understand we're the great Satan if not, mere puppets doing Israel's bidding.

Here's an example of the thinking of a gullible dupe with a mind made of mush, who on one hand will tell you government is bad, untrustworthy, incompetent, etc., but as soon as that same government presents "evidence" of another's hostility, tells him to hate that country, and support bombing them, he snaps into line... no matter how many times this same government proves to be full of shit when it comes to foreign policy.

 

[Spartanmack]

Here's an example of the thinking of a gullible dupe with a mind made of mush, who on one hand will tell you government is bad, untrustworthy, incompetent, etc., but as soon as that same government presents "evidence" of another's hostility, tells him to hate that country, and support bombing them, he snaps into line... no matter how many times this same government proves to be full of shit when it comes to foreign policy.

Actually, this thread and the person who started it is a much better example of the inability of a moron to think for himself, who on one hand will tell you (because he heard it somewhere else because again, he can't think for himself) the US government is an evil, untrustworthy, incompetent, wasteful, imperialistic war mongering tool of billionaires, etc but as soon as that same government presents ideas not only without evidence but in the face of more than half a century's worth of evidence of the abject failure of those ideas and tells them they're going to get it right, he snaps in line... no matter how many countries were bankrupted and left in ruins or how many tens of millions of people were murdered in the pursuit of those ideas.

And by the way, I'm not in favor of going to war with any of those countries - I know you have trouble with sarcasm so I thought I should point that out before you say more stupid shit about something I'm not saying.

 

[byco42]

Here's an example of the thinking of a gullible dupe with a mind made of mush, who on one hand will tell you government is bad, untrustworthy, incompetent, etc., but as soon as that same government presents "evidence" of another's hostility, tells him to hate that country, and support bombing them, he snaps into line... no matter how many times this same government proves to be full of shit when it comes to foreign policy.

Sic (sic) of your comminist (sic) propagander (sic)

 

[Polish-Hammer]

Don?t worry fellas. Unless Iran does something utterly outrageous, there?s not going to be a war. But this thread does give a few of you the opportunity to continue to appear stupid.

But the Persians did something outrageous.



They removed the Dictator the US/UK placed in power.



They than resisted the Iraqi invasion backed by the US/UK.


Than they had their passenger airliner crash into a friendly US anti-air missile, while the US naval vessel was 100% not within Persian territorial waters.


All 3 are major transgressions the United States cannot forgive.