mhughes0021
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 28,775
It just seems everything your talking about is short sighted. Yes we aren't gonna be able to build a very good defense this year, but regardless if we didn't have Goff on the books that defense would still have sucked, just maybe a little bit less. Worst case on Goff is he completely blows this year and we draft a QB next year. We either trade him (if possible would be 0 cap hit), or cut him and take on 15mil in dead money (save 10mil). Best case is he gets back to the level of play from 2-3 years ago and we have a top 10 QB on a very reasonable contract for three more years. There is not a huge downside here.
I've detailed plenty of times on here, but it is not out of the realm of possibility to enter 2022 with 70mil+ cap space (with Goff) and a bunch of draft picks.
1st (top 3)
1st (Rams)
1st (Washington)
2nd (top 3)
2nd (giants)
3rd (top 3)
3rd (Comp
4th (top 3)
4th (comp)
5th (top 3)
6th (top 3)
6th (comp)
7th (top 3)
7th (comp).
Even if you remove the theoretical picks from a Golladay trade (still get a comp 3rd) and trade down in draft you still have a bunch of picks
1st (top 3)
1st (Rams)
2nd (top 3)
3rd (top 3)
3rd (Comp)
3rd (Comp)
4th (top 3)
4th (comp)
5th (top 3)
6th (top 3)
6th (comp)
7th (top 3)
Now say Goff plays reasonable well this year (above average), would you not be excited about next year with all that cap space available and draft capital? We could choose to draft Goff's replacement then or wait it out another year and still have flexibility to get a QB with two firsts in 2023.
As far as Hand, that guy was a good player as a rookie. Injuries and horrendous coaching have probably stunted his growth. I have no problem seeing what this coaching staff can do for him this year and counting on him as a starter. If he sucks then let him go as a FA next year, no harm no foul. That is the beauty of this year, we know we aren't going to win a lot of games so who the hell cares, lets find out what we already have on this roster.
you seem to be contradicting yourself.
Youre saying im shortsighted because i would prefer a rookie qb thats under contract for 4 years with a 5th year option.
Yet youre not short sighted by not minding a QB under contract for only 2 years whos been underperforming his current deal, recently demoted/forced out of his job, and carries a cap hit that negatively impacts our team. And if he fails you need out figure something out again in 2 years and do yet another rebuild at the most important position in the game.
Its confusing how im the short sighted one in this situation.