So MLB went up in value because of peds? Or they went up in value despite peds? Not sure I understand your point.
"Because of the alleged conspiracy, the lawsuit contends MLB has suffered "costs of investigation, loss of goodwill, loss of revenue and profits and injury to its reputation, image, strategic advantage and fan relationships," attorneys Allen Weitzman and Matthew Menchel wrote in the complaint."
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_...ll-files-lawsuit-seeking-biogenesis-documents
Since MLB has recorded ~ $$$7.5 B in revenues during '12, prior to when the list of players' names was published earlier this year by the Miami New Times' reporter Tim Elfrink, MLB's alleging that it has suffered great financial harm, as a direct result of the alleged use by active players of banned substances/PEDs will be extremely difficult, if not impossible to prove in court.
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2013-0...-supplies-drugs-to-sports-biggest-names/full/
MLB also has not (as yet) even proven by urine samples/blood tests that all of the players on that list, other than a few, such as the Tigers' minor leaguer, Cesar Carrillo who was suspended for 100 games, Melky Cabrera who last year who served a 50-game suspension for elevated testosterone had taken any PEDs/banned substances. Ryan Braun, of course had been "exonerated" due to a procedural technicality. A half-dozen or so players on that list being named obviously is a very small percentage out of all of the active players in MLB, anyway.
Last edited: