https://totallytigers.wordpress.com/2022/10/21/saturday-survey-50/
SATURDAY SURVEY.
Totally Tigers
In an interview earlier this week, President of Baseball Operations Scott Harris made some revealing comments about the organization?s corporate culture. Since he was hired in September, Harris has been digging into the team?s structure and meeting with as many employees as possible.
He indicated that there has been a pervasive practice of stifling constructive discussion. That employees were dissuaded from offering feedback and that a system of analyzing decisions and their worth was non-existent.
That bad decisions remained because constructive criticism was not allowed.
That this practice was embraced and enforced by multiple employees, presumably those holding positions of power.
That trust was non-existent and that the organization suffered in an attempt to rebuild the team to any significant degree.
Here is Harris? quote:
?I think we need to create a relationship in which we are very comfortable giving each other feedback?. I also think we need to create relationships up and down the organization in which we are receiving a lot of feedback about some of the decisions we?re making and the culture we?re creating. If we can do that, if we can establish that trust up and down our front office, our ideas are going to be a little bit better, our decisions are going to be a little bit better, our in-game strategy is going to be a little bit better.?
Given this statement, to what extent did this type of corporate culture contribute to the Tigers? inability to progress in successfully rebuilding?
How much did the Tigers' suppression of feedback factor into their inability to successfully rebuild?
1. It was a huge factor.
2. It mattered to some extent.
3. It wasn't a factor at all.
VOTE