redandguilty
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,227
MichChamp02 said:see, maybe I'm just too logically consistent, but you can't have moral failings, and then insist I have to follow you because all your moral teachings are flawless. it's an all or nothing proposition. they insist they represent a higher moral standard than any other authority, yet they ask us to willingly ignore all the criminally abhorrent things they do.
to put it another way: if the catholic church could get pregnant, you can sure as shit bet THEY would be taking birth control, while insisting anyone else who did was violating the word of god, sinning, whatever.
they can go fuck themselves. if this sparks a further backlash against the church and everyone stops going and they have to close up shop and head back to Rome, I would be happy, clap my hands and cheer. it would be a good thing.
the law here is clear to begin with... and shouldn't have been a problem. Yet they choose to pick a fight over this issue, since it affects their "sincerely held beliefs." Ha. okay, well fine, even though they were in the wrong from the get go, obama offers them a face-saving way to back down. They feel empowered enough here (who knows exactly what their strategy is, and who is involved in it) to ignore it and throw down the gauntlet. Let's see what happens. Hopefully it blows up in their face.
I hope you hold yourself to that standard, seeing how you like to throw the word hypocrite at groups of people.
Is there a point to starting a phrase with "you can't have moral failings and..."? Who on earth is the rest of that supposed to apply to? Who is left to teach morality, or is it a subject that should never be taught by anyone?