Anyone think Administration will lose votes

[Michchamp]

I need to make the Politics board part of my rotation again. I stopped checking it when tsmith7559 was making every other post.

So did I.

I kinda did too.

I wonder what happened to that moron?

 

[KAWDUP]

. . . same thing goes for post #80, actually .

So I guess that ends it for you because you no longer understand anything anymore. Typical.

 

[deathroh]

So did I.

I kinda did too.

I wonder what happened to that moron?

I checked his profile after posting that, his last post was on 1/2, last log in was a couple weeks ago.

I'm guessing tsmith was kawdup all along..

 

[Michchamp]

I could see that.

he logs in as tsmith when he wants to REALLY let loose with the Glenn Beck / Rush Limbaugh stuff.

on most days though, he's just good old KAWDUP, the "right-wing uncle" who starts political arguments with "crazy-cat-lady aunt" at the Thanksgiving dinner table.

Then, later on when everyone is trying to watch the Lions' game, he insists they turn to Fox News to learn "what's going on in the world" instead of watching "the distractions," and when your cousin gets pissed, he calls him a "liberal sheep."

 

[TheVictors]

"small business owner" from Clarkston, MI ....?

 

[byco42]

When arguing the collective rights of a government elected by the people vs the collective rights of a religion on matters of health care, national security, etc. I'll take the side of elected government and an appointed judiciary.

There is no such thing as collective rights.

 

[Michchamp]

"small business owner" from Clarkston, MI ....?

I think he said he was a road paver. when someone criticised his anti-tax stance by pointing out that taxes paid for roads, and he also used roads, he went on some long rant about how he built the roads himself.

 

[TheVictors]

maybe he was the owner of a small paving company in Clarkston.

 

[TheVictors]

http://detroitsports.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=gotopost&board=talkpolitics&thread=3927&post=96199

 

[johnny2x2x]

hmmm... nothing to refute in post #97, just an incoherent, angry-sounding rant.

anyways, looks like obama agreed to some sort of "compromise" which shifts some or all of the costs for actual birth control from the church-employers to the insurance companies.

I guess it makes everyone happy, except the insurance companies, for whom this will cut into their profit margins.

SO... the republicans boot the political football at Obama, and he boots it right back.

Actually, the insurance companies are fine with this as they will be pushing birth control hard, it saves them money to prevent pregnancies.

 

[KAWDUP]

I could see that.

he logs in as tsmith when he wants to REALLY let loose with the Glenn Beck / Rush Limbaugh stuff.

on most days though, he's just good old KAWDUP, the "right-wing uncle" who starts political arguments with "crazy-cat-lady aunt" at the Thanksgiving dinner table.

Then, later on when everyone is trying to watch the Lions' game, he insists they turn to Fox News to learn "what's going on in the world" instead of watching "the distractions," and when your cousin gets pissed, he calls him a "liberal sheep."

Huh?

Is the sky blue in your world?

BTW I haven't ever used any other name. I don't have to - I have nothing to hide. Had it since ESPN in 2000. How long you had yours - what . . . a week?

. . . but you go ahead and keep up with your moronic comments. It is what you do.

 

[redandguilty]

When arguing the collective rights of a government elected by the people vs the collective rights of a religion on matters of health care, national security, etc. I'll take the side of elected government and an appointed judiciary.

There is no such thing as collective rights.

That's not what my HOA thinks.

 

[Michchamp]

There is no such thing as collective rights.

That's not what my HOA thinks.

No. There is no such thing as collective rights. Byco says so. no further proof needed, and no examples to the contrary may be posted.

 

[TheVictors]

I think it is more of an opinion than a factual statement.

 

[redandguilty]

I think Spock would disagree too.

 

[KAWDUP]

So, it looks like the Catholic Bishops reject the compromise. Probably saw through it right away. Guess it isn't just the right who is thinking the compromise was just a bunch of hogwash.

Also I read where this was a very calculated move by the administration because they thought this would galvanize young woman to vote for Obama and scare them away from voting Republican because, of course, those dastardly Republicans don't want them to be healthy and this will stop them from intruding on their rights to use contraception.

May have backfired. "May" . . . I say again, because it isn't over just yet.

 

[Michchamp]

oh darn. those child molester-enablers rejected the deal.

 

[KAWDUP]

That's like saying you are fucking idiot because .1% of the people that post on this board are fucking idiots.

Good for you. Got any more stupid comments to add?

I bet you don't even get the correlation.

 

[Thumb]

That's like saying you are fucking idiot because .1% of the people that post on this board are fucking idiots.

Good for you. Got any more stupid comments to add?

I bet you don't even get the correlation.

That analogy only applies if you mean that the other 99% of the board tried to cover for the 1% that are idiots.

 

[KAWDUP]

Ha! Ha! LOL

Your reply - case in point?