Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Are you excited about the Royal Wedding?

Are you excited for the Royal Wedding?

  • Oh yes! with the costumes and dresses... it's so... magical!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fuck no. Like... FUCK NO. FUCK YOU.

    Votes: 7 100.0%
  • As a Conservative Republican I'm torn between my love of aristocracy and my fake love for equality.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .
I just saw Serena next to Abigail Spencer. Abigail is certainly a Timeless beauty.
 
Last edited:
none of the Conservatives had the sack to step up and vote for choice #3...
 
none of the Conservatives had the sack to step up and vote for choice #3...

Dude, my friend, if I may tell you in all due respect-your options were dumb.

The best choice-it could have been the fourth choice-"my wife is going to watch it and I'll decide if I'm going to watch it with my wife or not at the time."

Loving the Royals isn't a partisan thing-it's a gender thing. Chicks love the Royals, guys don't really give much of a shit.

Meghan is from Los Angeles as my wife is (which you know). We both know people pretty well who know Meghan pretty well.

Anyway, God willing, the Queen will live long enough to see little black great grand children.

I don't see how there is anything bad about that.

Unless, of course, some racist Bobby shoots them while they are unarmed.
 
Last edited:
I don't think my poll choices were dumb.

They were not.

Your choice not to include "I'll watch it with my wife/girlfriend/same sex lover/orgy participants I might happen to be involved with at the time of they want to" was an oversight exclusion though.

Almost all of us would have selected that. I would have.

It was like posting on a lesbian chat board "who is looking forward to the Super Bowl?"

What lipstick lesbian is going to answer "I hate the Super Bowl, but I watch it with my butch diesel Dyke wife because afterwords it's the best sex of the year?"
 
Last edited:
Seeing people on facebook, one of the options should have been "This is an excuse to wear fancy hats and dresses and drink mimosas in the morning, which is my version of tailgating, so I'm going all in just like I do for the Kentucky Derby (though I couldn't tell you anything about any of the horses either.)"
 
Seeing people on facebook, one of the options should have been "This is an excuse to wear fancy hats and dresses and drink mimosas in the morning, which is my version of tailgating, so I'm going all in just like I do for the Kentucky Derby (though I couldn't tell you anything about any of the horses either.)"

Justified won the Kentucky Derby. Running in the Preakness today.

Justified won the Santa Anita Stakes in early April, out here 25 miles from me, just east of the Rose Bowl.

I think we'll just start going to the Santa Anita race every year.

My wife can wear the fascinator hat that she bought for the royal wedding yesterday.
 
Did you know that there's like a whole loosely organized community of techno-geeks that views democracy as a failure and longs for a day when there's a new aristocracy of like tech-bros that preside over everyone else as nobility?

I read about them last year. they're like a combination of reactionary right-wing-libertarian tech-geek losers who don't get laid, and non-techno-geek but equally awful Breitbart readers (who obviously also can't get laid).

I assume those guys are all tuning in. Royal weddings push all their buttons.
 
I'm not knocking the people that don't know the horses. I don't even mind people that go nuts over Michigan football tailgating, but don't know anything about it. that used to be me, at least at first. We all got to start somewhere. You get excited first and become informed later.
 
Last edited:
Did you know that there's like a whole loosely organized community of techno-geeks that views democracy as a failure and longs for a day when there's a new aristocracy of like tech-bros that preside over everyone else as nobility?

I read about them last year. they're like a combination of reactionary right-wing-libertarian tech-geek losers who don't get laid, and non-techno-geek but equally awful Breitbart readers (who obviously also can't get laid).

I assume those guys are all tuning in. Royal weddings push all their buttons.


I've read some about their take on dating and sex.
 
Did you know that there's like a whole loosely organized community of techno-geeks that views democracy as a failure and longs for a day when there's a new aristocracy of like tech-bros that preside over everyone else as nobility?

I read about them last year. they're like a combination of reactionary right-wing-libertarian tech-geek losers who don't get laid, and non-techno-geek but equally awful Breitbart readers (who obviously also can't get laid).

I assume those guys are all tuning in. Royal weddings push all their buttons.

The world should never be run by guys who can't get laid.

And it never will be.
 
none of the Conservatives had the sack to step up and vote for choice #3...

like me, most probably thought it was a really stupid poll and again like me, conservatives don't believe what you think they believe. Why would take "sack" to step up and vote for something that grossly misrepresents what they stand for in a poll about something that for the most part, only women (and soft pudgy sissies, like you) care about?
 
Last edited:
Did you know that there's like a whole loosely organized community of techno-geeks that views democracy as a failure and longs for a day when there's a new aristocracy of like tech-bros that preside over everyone else as nobility?

I read about them last year. they're like a combination of reactionary right-wing-libertarian tech-geek losers who don't get laid, and non-techno-geek but equally awful Breitbart readers (who obviously also can't get laid).

I assume those guys are all tuning in. Royal weddings push all their buttons.


This is not what I read about before. Also, 180? from GW Bush/Natan Sharansky.


Sort of makes sense for programmers to think like this though.
 
Last edited:
I know some guys that would be pissed to know there are Americans watching a Royal wedding...

[During the Revolutionary War, American] prisoners of war were harassed and abused by guards who, with little success, offered release to those who agreed to serve in the British Navy. Over 10,000 American prisoners of war died from neglect. Their corpses were often tossed overboard, though sometimes they were buried in shallow graves along the eroding shoreline.​
 
I know some guys that would be pissed to know there are Americans watching a Royal wedding...

[During the Revolutionary War, American] prisoners of war were harassed and abused by guards who, with little success, offered release to those who agreed to serve in the British Navy. Over 10,000 American prisoners of war died from neglect. Their corpses were often tossed overboard, though sometimes they were buried in shallow graves along the eroding shoreline.​

Yeah, I'm over it.

God save my former neighbor, the Duchess of Sussex, I says.
 
Saw some of the Cord and Tish coverage. Not bad. I'd probably watch more of the Winter Olympics if they did the commentary. If you can do 6 simulcasts of big NCAA football games, I don't see why NBC couldn't have Cord and Tish on another channel.
 
Last edited:
Saw some of the Cord and Tish coverage. Not bad. I'd probably watch more of the Winter Olympics if they did the commentary. If you can do 6 simulcasts of big NCAA football games, I don't see why NBC couldn't have Cord and Tish on another channel.


So they're not porn stars? A little disappointing I have to say..
 
Back
Top