Gulo Blue
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Messages
- 13,502
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozlbeXrb_5A
Bill thinks that poorer nations are having too many kids, because they don?t have access to contraception. Or, ultimately, abortion. The ?tools? he alludes to. Bill is concerned that the kids being born are a burden on those older than themselves, and fewer of them is a good thing for everyone involved. The population density in Niger, one of his targeted countries where things could become ?impossible? is 17 people per square kilometer.
Here?s an idea for Bill. Just take care of whoever is born in Niger, rather than preventing the event. Care for the babies that are being born. Recommend other natural methods of ?spacing out? births. They are highly effective.
He thinks the worlds? population is at a ?manageable? size of 2.1 kids, with his tell-tale smirk. @ 1:42.
1:05 ?What we need to do ...? to the end. *chills* and not the good ones.
That's a huge difference. Targeted concern for poor places where there are currently 7 kids per family likely heading for disaster is entirely different from a desire for policy to force global population reduction. And it's definitely not a reason for me to question his work/interest in reducing disease, pushing nuclear power, or worrying about food supplies.