Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coronainsanity

I think it's insane and highly disingenuous to claim "the efficacy of masks was questionable at best"

There's no question they reduce the amount of aerosols people exhale, and hence reduce the transmission of viruses. Fuck, remember that clip TomDalton posted of the guy spraying alcohol, and how much masking the spray, even with a flimsy mask, reduced the flammability? That should've ended the debate for even the most brainless, drooling Trumpers here, but it's unbelievable people are now trying to re-write history in real time, after all we fucking went through for the last year.

A paper or cloth mask won't provide much protection for you if you're going to stand in a COVID-19 ward for an hour; you're going to inhale enough of the viral load to make you sick. But that's not the point, and using that sort of standard to disparage mask use is ridiculous.
 
LOL, I thought that too. Alex Jones can and does make up whatever he wants. I mean, he claimed a mass shooting at a school with dozens of little kids slaughtered was a myth, and called greiving parents of dead little kids "crisis actors." there is no depth to which a person like that won't sink to make a buck.


Fuck, I am really starting to hate posting here.
 
The doctor who thanked Dr. Fauci for dismissing the Wuhan lab leak theory is the same guy who gave $600k to the lab, ?investigated? it for the WHO and then acted as a Facebook fact checker censoring info on the Wuhan lab leak theory

You couldn?t make this up.

https://youtu.be/ZFntTtPgpEU

More damning are e-mails - I heard a number of them read on the radio yesterday - by colleagues in Faucci?s inner circle that expressed the same inclinations that the virus had been developed in a lab that they had come to through their own research that Faucci was publicly dismissing as wack job ?conspiracy theories? by those seen as aligned with the former president.

I don?t like to use terms like ?main stream media? or ?narrative? or ?media bias? and so forth, but something is hard to miss - critical thinking seemed to go out the window with much of the fourth estate regarding our last president - some of them are actually acknowledging it now, really without even any kind of mea culpa - that is simply, what? Intolerable? Unforgivable? For the last bastion and final guardian of the truth?
 
I think it's insane and highly disingenuous to claim "the efficacy of masks was questionable at best"

There's no question they reduce the amount of aerosols people exhale, and hence reduce the transmission of viruses. Fuck, remember that clip TomDalton posted of the guy spraying alcohol, and how much masking the spray, even with a flimsy mask, reduced the flammability? That should've ended the debate for even the most brainless, drooling Trumpers here, but it's unbelievable people are now trying to re-write history in real time, after all we fucking went through for the last year.

A paper or cloth mask won't provide much protection for you if you're going to stand in a COVID-19 ward for an hour; you're going to inhale enough of the viral load to make you sick. But that's not the point, and using that sort of standard to disparage mask use is ridiculous.

Tell that to Faucci.

He wrote the e-mail about the general uselessness of masks. That e-mail isn?t a real time re-write; that e-mail was written in the spring of last year.

And tell that to the CDC.

They conducted the study Trump referred to.

I guess you can blame/credit the Freedom of Information Act for the ?real time re-write,? of shit that corroborates things I was saying a year ago.

I don?t think I?ve ever been referred to as a drooling Trumper before.

HA HA...a Tomdalton22 YouTube video posted on the DSF?

Boy...that?s going to be the rage of ALL the Sunday morning talk shows!
 
Last edited:

She is wrong trump cannot be reinstated it?s just string along operation trust 2.0 Q horseshit and Lin Wood is bat shit crazy. He makes Alex Jones look sane.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/infowars-told-you-about-the-wuhan-leak-in-jan-2020/
 
Last edited:
I think it's insane and highly disingenuous to claim "the efficacy of masks was questionable at best"

No insofar as it applies to paper masks.

The CDC recommended as the only viable solution a cloth mask with at least two layers of washable fabric. All of its studies were conducted with cloth masks.
 
More damning are e-mails - I heard a number of them read on the radio yesterday - by colleagues in Faucci?s inner circle that expressed the same inclinations that the virus had been developed in a lab that they had come to through their own research that Faucci was publicly dismissing as wack job ?conspiracy theories? by those seen as aligned with the former president.

I don?t like to use terms like ?main stream media? or ?narrative? or ?media bias? and so forth, but something is hard to miss - critical thinking seemed to go out the window with much of the fourth estate regarding our last president - some of them are actually acknowledging it now, really without even any kind of mea culpa - that is simply, what? Intolerable? Unforgivable? For the last bastion and final guardian of the truth?

not a single question was posed about the emails during yesterday's White House press corps briefing. Not one. Don't expect a mea culpa any time soon.
 
not a single question was posed about the emails during yesterday's White House press corps briefing. Not one. Don't expect a mea culpa any time soon.

Not much.

I?ve heard a couple of people acknowledge ?just because Trump said it doesn?t necessarily mean it was wrong or not true.?

Ya think, Dinozzo?

It?s called ?critical thinking.?

Objective journalists are supposed to be good at it.
 
The only Objective journalists left in America have all been banned, censored or otherwise cancelled tucker might be the only one left. Most all others have been chicom?d
 
I guess a few days ago FB said they will no longer remove posts claiming the China Virus was man-made - only 206 days after the election...
number-6-Maxwell-Smart.jpg
 
Last edited:
I guess a few days ago FB said they will no longer remove posts claiming the China Virus was man-made - only 206 days after the election. Just missed it.

FB successfully election meddled, zero accountability, still no durham report either. Imagine that, not that it matter anymore. The Q string along still says trump will be returned to office after all the audits nobody is covering. They are full of shit Q was taking over by CIA and became operation trust 2.0
 
Last edited:
What else is unforgivable is the way Fauci basically made it so difficult for doctors to prescribe hydroxychloroquine as a zinc ionophore when he absolutely had to know that many practitioners were using the medication very effectively when used in that context.
 
The only Objective journalists left in America have all been banned, censored or otherwise cancelled tucker might be the only one left. Most all others have been chicom?d

I don?t think Tucker Carlson is an objective reporter nor do I think he claims to be. I think he would define himself as an editorial journalist who has a conservative/libertarian perspective, which is fine, just like it?s fine for a self proclaimed liberal/progressive editorial journalist to be that.

What isn?t fine is for an objective reporter to abandon critical thinking just because the president would say crazy shit sometimes, or even lots of times - everybody knew that about him. It?s not an excuse.
 
I don?t think Tucker Carlson is an objective reporter nor do I think he claims to be. I think he would define himself as an editorial journalist who has a conservative/libertarian perspective, which is fine, just like it?s fine for a self proclaimed liberal/progressive editorial journalist to be that.

What isn?t fine is for an objective reporter to abandon critical thinking just because the president would say crazy shit sometimes, or even lots of times - everybody knew that about him. It?s not an excuse.

or because that guy isn't President anymore. The fact that not a single reporter has asked the White House about Fauci's emails that seem to indicate, at a minimum that he has perjured himself a few times this week, is just as telling as to how they've completely abandoned critical thinking and their responsibility as journalists.
 
Last edited:
or because that guy isn't President anymore. The fact that not a single reporter has asked the White House about Fauci's emails that seem to indicate, at a minimum that he has perjured himself a few times this week, is just as telling as to how they've completely abandoned critical thinking and their responsibility as journalists.

Right. I was going to refer to Trump as the last president but forgot to, and then when I realized it, I decided not to go back and change it, because he had been the president during the time which we are talking about, so either way would be fine.
 
I don?t think Tucker Carlson is an objective reporter nor do I think he claims to be. I think he would define himself as an editorial journalist who has a conservative/libertarian perspective, which is fine, just like it?s fine for a self proclaimed liberal/progressive editorial journalist to be that.

What isn?t fine is for an objective reporter to abandon critical thinking just because the president would say crazy shit sometimes, or even lots of times - everybody knew that about him. It?s not an excuse.

He asks questions still nobody else is willing to ask anymore other than maybe Alex Jones but tucker isn?t a raving lunatic so the presentation is much cleaner

Not sure about Hannity and Ingram I don?t watch them much anymore. Maybe Bongino he?s pretty good also.
 
Back
Top