By:
Advanced search…

Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coronainsanity

Even now, if I had some magic perfect ability to know exactly what the probability of transmission in any given situation, I probably wouldn't be able to construct rules that would make everyone happy. This stuff is difficult and people have a remarkable ability to screw things up. If I say 'wear a mask and stay 6 ft apart' and survey people that test positively or negatively for covid, my study wouldn't capture how many people said they followed the rules but didn't wear their mask over their nose or don't count the 6 foot rule when someone else steps into 'their space' or don't know what six feet is or just said they followed the rules because they felt pressure to say they followed the rules, or followed the rules, but spent an hour in a small room with friends.
 
Gulo Blue said:
I can't speak for him, but I assume it's because this stuff is hard to figure out and he had it wrong at first.
Click to expand...

If he was ?wrong? at first, why would I believe he?s right now?

It?s like the Alameda County downward revision of the Covid death count that a link was posted to a report of earlier on this board. They realized they had been over counting deaths as being from Covid that weren?t from Covid.

No shit?! Ya don?t say?! Who would have that they had been over counting? Oh wait a minute - that?s right ? FUCKING I THOUGHT THAT! I?ve only been saying that from the beginning right here on this thread.

The thing is, if it was too high the first report, why would I think it?s still not too high this new report? They already fucked up the once.

EDIT: Here it is again, for anyone who missed it the first time.
 
Last edited:
tinselwolverine said:
If he was ?wrong? at first, why would I believe he?s right now?

It?s like the Alameda County downward revision of the Covid death count that a link was posted to a report of earlier on this board. They realized they had been over counting deaths as being from Covid that weren?t from Covid.

No shit?! Ya don?t say?! Who would have that they had been over counting? Oh wait a minute - that?s right ? FUCKING I THOUGHT THAT! I?ve only been saying that from the beginning right here on this thread.

The thing is, if it was too high the first report, why would I think it?s still not too high this new report? They already fucked up the once.
Click to expand...


Presumably there's more info than just the totals. More information that would be useful in estimating how reliable the new number is. The flip side of your observation, is if they were lying before, why revise it now to another lie? If there's evidence catching you red-handed your new lie will probably get caught too, if there isn't, why revise in the first place?
 
Gulo Blue said:
Presumably there's more info than just the totals. More information that would be useful in estimating how reliable the new number is. The flip side of your observation, is if they were lying before, why revise it now to another lie? If there's evidence catching you red-handed your new lie will probably get caught too, if there isn't, why revise in the first place?
Click to expand...

Maybe they were lying, I wouldn?t say that?s been that?s been demonstrated.

It?s demonstrated they were wrong.

EDIT: @:33 through 1:25, Mahar say some funny shit about lying.

But the whole thing is good.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp3gy_CLXho
 
Last edited:
tinselwolverine said:
Maybe they were lying, I wouldn?t say that?s been that?s been demonstrated.

It?s demonstrated they were wrong.
Click to expand...

Some relative words would be helpful then. If there's no reason to think they aren't still wrong, is there reason to think they are more or less wrong than before? If they are more wrong than before, then you're wrong too!
 
Gulo Blue said:
Some relative words would be helpful then. If there's no reason to think they aren't still wrong, is there reason to think they are more or less wrong than before? If they are more wrong than before, then you're wrong too!
Click to expand...

Father, mother, sister, brother, son, daughter, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, cousin.

In other languages there are different words that designate the gender of a cousin.
 
michchamp said:
site I read has been tracking COVID infection rates, hospitalizations, deaths, and positive tests daily, for a while now.

So this isn't "alarmism"... it's just what is happening...

You can see the slope of the graph is increasing again, toward where it was in the first wave. We're at 26,448 new cases per day, as a 7 day average. Fuck.
Click to expand...


Still think the blue states won't be locking down again by late summer early fall? never happen right? and they'll blame it all on the unvaccinated which is will be complete horseshit nonsense.
 
tinselwolverine said:
?99% of the people becoming seriously ill and needing to be hospitalized are unvaccinated?

?WhiteHouse coming down hard and big tech companies trying to get them to stop the flow of all this vaccine disinformation.?

Those are two audio blurbs I just heard on KTLA5.

Here?s where ya gotta think really critically.

What are the demographics of the people who were hospitalized? Are they people who had reason to believe they were at a fairly low risk because of age and no underlying comorbidities, or were they people who might have known that they were at a higher risk yet chose not to get vaccinated for whatever reason they chose?

I don?t know, and we need to know the answers to that.

Now, the second blurb - I?m with Mud on that one - sounds like de facto censorship to me.

Who is the arbiter of what ?disinformation? is - the White House? Ummm?no. Not according to the Constitution.

Dr. Kelly Victory joined Trump?s lawsuit against Big Tech on the grounds they?ve acting as an extension of the government; we?ll see how it goes.



On Monday I?m going to reach out to my friends in media to see if I can get some answers on the demographics of the unvaccinated people who are being hospitalized regarding specifically their ages and any underlying health conditions. I?ll get back to you guys with what I find out.
Click to expand...


I would still have to call BS on the 99% KTLA5 should be sighting their source on that so it can be reviewed for any BS or political narrative agendas.
 
Last edited:
tigermud said:
I would still have to call BS on the 99% KTLA5 should be sighting their source on that so it can be reviewed for any BS or political narrative agendas.
Click to expand...

I heard a UCLA epidemiologists are saying the same thing.

Their source is probably the county.

Is the county lying?

They could be.

I called Dr. victory and John Phillips asked her if them if they knew anything about the demographics and underlying health conditions of the people in the hospital. The doc said that that would be an important thing to look into. If the county were lying about the data, she would probably know and she probably would?ve said so. She definitely isn?t shy to call Fauci and Biden and Jen sake And the rest of them a bunch of liars.
 
Today Biden suggested that the un-vaccinated are killing people. Nonsense, and I have yet to read of any peer reviewed scientific proof that asymptomatic spread isn't extremely rare. That's all a Fraudchi turd drop.

Just like I said months ago in the future you will be considered a bio hazard if you refuse the vaccine. Some of these democrats are extremely tyrannical. Let us hope it's not all locked down and mail in harvest setup again for the mid terms or else this country is finished IMO. If it isn't already.
 
Last edited:
tinselwolverine said:
I heard a UCLA epidemiologists are saying the same thing.

Their source is probably the county.

Is the county lying?

They could be.

I called Dr. victory and John Phillips asked her if them if they knew anything about the demographics and underlying health conditions of the people in the hospital. The doc said that that would be an important thing to look into. If the county were lying about the data, she would probably know and she probably would?ve said so. She definitely isn?t shy to call Fauci and Biden and Jen sake And the rest of them a bunch of liars.
Click to expand...


And by County that would be LA, so according to Ferrer then? Trust but verify? I don't believe it for a second.
 
tigermud said:
Today Biden suggested that the un-vaccinated are killing people. Nonsense, and I have yet to read of any peer reviewed scientific proof that asymptomatic spread isn't extremely rare. That's all a Fraudchi turd drop.

Just like I said months ago in the future you will be considered a bio hazard if you refuse the vaccine. Some of these democrats are extremely tyrannical. Let us hope it's not all locked down and mail in harvest setup again for the mid terms or else this country is finished IMO. If it isn't already.
Click to expand...

I have yet to read a peer reviewed paper saying ducks exists. Probably because I've never searched for peer reviewed papers on ducks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

About Us

Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!

Stay Connected

Forum statistics

Threads
34,781
Messages
1,129,167
Members
978
Latest member
Kamakzie

Affiliates

    Discussion Hub
Back
Top