Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coronainsanity

Right.

And that?s not what I was meaning to say.

I was confused too because he often writes very poorly, like he's on something or drunk. he refers to "libdem chicoms" and doesn't use punctuation or a conjunction to indicate they're separate groups, e.g. "libdems, chicoms, and..." or "libdems and chicoms"

It's important to have the nomenclature straight if we're to discuss this critical issue intelligently.
 
I was confused too because he often writes very poorly, like he's on something or drunk. he refers to "libdem chicoms" and doesn't use punctuation or a conjunction to indicate they're separate groups, e.g. "libdems, chicoms, and..." or "libdems and chicoms"

It's important to have the nomenclature straight if we're to discuss this critical issue intelligently.


Sometimes they?re the same, sometimes they?re different.

It?s intelligible in context.

Yet sometimes it?s intuitive.
 
I was confused too because he often writes very poorly, like he's on something or drunk. he refers to "libdem chicoms" and doesn't use punctuation or a conjunction to indicate they're separate groups, e.g. "libdems, chicoms, and..." or "libdems and chicoms"

It's important to have the nomenclature straight if we're to discuss this critical issue intelligently.

iPad thumb typing 99% of the time and like who gives a shit anyway how poorly I write not on my list of top priorities
 
Last edited:
We're finally getting a real uptick in proof of vaccination requirements with the FDA approval. Will there be an real increase in people protesting it, or has everybody that would object already been pegged to 100%?
 
We're finally getting a real uptick in proof of vaccination requirements with the FDA approval. Will there be an real increase in people protesting it, or has everybody that would object already been pegged to 100%?

Hard to say for sure, America is still lagging behind other countries in the degree of protest. I?m disappointed with that..hope to see it massively increase.
 

?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and become sterile.

Okay.

They?re not the type of things that people tend to associate with each other but OK.

What about playing the piano?

?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and not be able to play the piano.?

What about juggling?

?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and not be able to juggle.?

What about remembering how to ride a bike?

?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and not remember how to ride a bike.?

OK, that?s bullshit.

That?s where I draw the line.

Everybody who has ever learned to ride a bike will always remember how to ride a bike.

Everybody.
 
Last edited:
?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and become sterile.

Okay.

They?re not the type of things that people tend to associate with each other but OK.

What about playing the piano?

?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and not be able to play the piano.?

What about juggling?

?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and not be able to juggle.?

What about remembering how to ride a bike?

?He warned parents and board members that those who received the vaccine would die and not remember how to ride a bike.?

OK, that?s bullshit.

That?s where I draw the line.

Everybody who has ever learned to ride a bike will always remember how to ride a bike.

Everybody.

The closest event to posthumous fertility ever recorded:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hRoE2HRnpkk

This is close but it?s not conclusive that Ben, while virile, was fertile.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9mkk2KeRWM0
 
I wonder if anyone has done the math on how much of a clusterfuck it would be i- including but not limited to the number of dead - if we did nothing whatsoever, including taking common sense health precautions, to get to the "natural immunity" stage of covid-19 (if it's even biologically possible)

I wonder if anyone has done the math on how much of a clsterfuck the country wouldn't be if we had followed the science and protected the vulnerable and let everyone else get on with their lives - you know, since all the stupid crap we did, either didn't do anything to stem the spread, or it literally put a lot of vulnerable people at risk or killed them.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if anyone has done the math on how much of a clsterfuck the country wouldn't be if we had followed the science and protected the vulnerable and let everyone else get on with their lives - you know, since all the stupid crap we did, either didn't do anything to stem the spread, or it literally put a lot of vulnerable people at risk or killed them.

How do you "protect the vulnerable" while letting "everyone else get on with their lives"?

Remember, sound bites by themselves don't do anything. You have to actually have a policy to implement it in real life.
 
How do you "protect the vulnerable" while letting "everyone else get on with their lives"?

Remember, sound bites by themselves don't do anything. You have to actually have a policy to implement it in real life.

a couple ideas off the top of my head...you start by not forcing the vulnerable to live among infected people in nursing homes. Then you educate the public on the who is at risk and you isolate those people rather than trying to lock down an entire country. You make common sense recommendations that people can live with that will protect those people while not harming the rest of the population who is not at risk from this virus. It's really not that difficult.
 
Last edited:
a couple ideas off the top of my head...you start by not forcing the vulnerable to live among infected people in nursing homes. Then you educate the public on the who is at risk and you isolate those people rather than trying to lock down an entire country. You make common sense recommendations that people can live with that will protect those people while not harming the rest of the population who is not at risk from this virus. It's really not that difficult.

okay, so we find (build?) alternative housing for infected people. And of course their nurses and staffers would need to be isolated as well.

sounds a little more invasive and complicated than expected. but what do I know?

"educate the public on who is at risk"... well... a lot of people from all age groups, healthy, unhealthy, and many without "pre-existing conditions" all died. Also, as gulo helpfully pointed out once, like 2/3 of American adults (or so) are obese or overweight. so... we just needed to find a way to "isolate" about 200 Million people, so the rest of us could "get on with our lives."

Simple! Fuck, you should have been in charge all this time. How would we pay for that all? Maybe the "free market" would take care of it?

"common sense recommendations"... like wearing masks? Oh wait, no that violates our fundamental constitutional freedoms and is tyranny.
 
okay, so we find (build?) alternative housing for infected people. And of course their nurses and staffers would need to be isolated as well.

sounds a little more invasive and complicated than expected. but what do I know?

"educate the public on who is at risk"... well... a lot of people from all age groups, healthy, unhealthy, and many without "pre-existing conditions" all died. Also, as gulo helpfully pointed out once, like 2/3 of American adults (or so) are obese or overweight. so... we just needed to find a way to "isolate" about 200 Million people, so the rest of us could "get on with our lives."

Simple! Fuck, you should have been in charge all this time. How would we pay for that all? Maybe the "free market" would take care of it?

"common sense recommendations"... like wearing masks? Oh wait, no that violates our fundamental constitutional freedoms and is tyranny.

Yeah, not to get between the two of you?they don?t work.

Study after study is coming in and the more the virus mutates, as worthless as the masks have always been, they get even more worthless, as mind numbing as the concept of more worthless is.

It?s 0% to with science and 100% to do with politics and the TDS. One day, Trump cited a CDC study that correctly questioned the efficacy of the worthless mask - wait, what? Trump questioned the effectiveness of the masks? Well, that settles it - these masks must be saving lives every day!

And the barn door was open and the horses were off to the races.
 
Last edited:
okay, so we find (build?) alternative housing for infected people. And of course their nurses and staffers would need to be isolated as well.

sounds a little more invasive and complicated than expected. but what do I know?

"educate the public on who is at risk"... well... a lot of people from all age groups, healthy, unhealthy, and many without "pre-existing conditions" all died. Also, as gulo helpfully pointed out once, like 2/3 of American adults (or so) are obese or overweight. so... we just needed to find a way to "isolate" about 200 Million people, so the rest of us could "get on with our lives."

Simple! Fuck, you should have been in charge all this time. How would we pay for that all? Maybe the "free market" would take care of it?

"common sense recommendations"... like wearing masks? Oh wait, no that violates our fundamental constitutional freedoms and is tyranny.

you isolate infected people and limit their exposure. you realize doctors and nurses worked with infected people the whole time right? they wore PPE and took other measures to protect themselves and it worked - they didn't all get sick and die. Obviously, there are ways to prevent the spread without locking everyone down and using scare tactics to control behavior like telling everyone to wear masks that don't work.

What you refuse to see is that not only did all the lock downs, mask mandates and other measures not work (as evidenced by the fact that states with the strictist policies has some of the worst outcomes), but people know they didn't work and now they don't trust these public health experts you worship - and rightfully so. If they had taken a different, more sensical approach to this, outcomes would have been better, the economy wouldn't have been ruined, big tech billionaires wouldn't have seen the large and fast growth in their wealth, and people would have more faith in the experts you worship.

Edit: since it's not obvious to you, recommending people wear masks isn't a violation of their freedoms. Mandates on the other hand, are a different story. Are you sure you went to law school?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top