They were very unlucky in 2012 but less talented (even more injuries and one less ofseason to acquire talent). Lions 2012 offseason all the resources was to keep the playoff team together. Mayhew accomplished that.
There is a grantland article on it too on the recovery rates in 2012. Offensively they weren't as good in 2012 becaus the offense wasn't complete without a Best/Bush type and Burleson missed 9 games, Pettigrew missed 4. 2012 DE play was very poor (and was thus reloaded in 2013) and Delmas missed half the season and Bentley got hurt (Houston played well though).
Bears and Packers dealt with injuries and it cost them wins too. Just like injuries cost the Lions wins. Most of the Lions losses,not all, but most the Lions were the more injured team. There are 3 double digit winning capable teams in this division and the Lions are one of them.
Depth is hit or miss each game. Sometimes the Lions had good depth, I gave examples above. Sometimes the depth didn't show (Fox for example, Bentley on the outside CB spot, WR depth of Durham/Ogletree). Green and Greenwood did fine, Bell did well, Waddle was a huge find, Slay did well his last 2 games, Hill was always a good backup. Impossible to have depth at every position. And the turnover problems were talented players that were turnover prone. Injuries in the 1-6 finish and depth needed is bad combo.
There is a grantland article on it too on the recovery rates in 2012. Offensively they weren't as good in 2012 becaus the offense wasn't complete without a Best/Bush type and Burleson missed 9 games, Pettigrew missed 4. 2012 DE play was very poor (and was thus reloaded in 2013) and Delmas missed half the season and Bentley got hurt (Houston played well though).
Bears and Packers dealt with injuries and it cost them wins too. Just like injuries cost the Lions wins. Most of the Lions losses,not all, but most the Lions were the more injured team. There are 3 double digit winning capable teams in this division and the Lions are one of them.
Depth is hit or miss each game. Sometimes the Lions had good depth, I gave examples above. Sometimes the depth didn't show (Fox for example, Bentley on the outside CB spot, WR depth of Durham/Ogletree). Green and Greenwood did fine, Bell did well, Waddle was a huge find, Slay did well his last 2 games, Hill was always a good backup. Impossible to have depth at every position. And the turnover problems were talented players that were turnover prone. Injuries in the 1-6 finish and depth needed is bad combo.