Spartanmack
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 17,532
There has beens some pointed criticism of the 1619 project (and what's her name specifically) from the left. So I actually agree that she should not be receiving tenure here.
the World Socialist Website had a long piece that interviewed actual historians and concluded the idea that the American Revolution was fought to preserve slavery was bullshit.
But if she's a racist bomb thrower, so are the bums that write for the Daily Wire.
What else could this piece be? If the Daily Wire really had a problem with No-show grades and bullshit classes, they should take a shot at every college athletic department in this country, or the way the Federalist Society promotes under-qualified lawyers to clerkships and judgeships based on their ideology alone... but no, they won't piss in the wrong toilets...
It's probably because UNC offered this fraud a tenured professorship and they were caught running a fake school in one of the most high profile cases of academic fraud. Not every school has been caught in one of the biggest academic fraud scandals and also offered a tenured professorship to someone responsible for publishing perhaps the most ahistorical history pieces.
But since you bring it up, when you bitch and moan about a specific case or issue do you hold yourself to the same standard? How about your sources - how come you post articles that don't take on every single institution that also has been affected by that issue? I can't think of a single one of your whiny posts about the child molestation scandal within the Catholic Church that mentions anything about the issue in the public school system or even in any other religious community. Is it because you think that by attacking the source you could summarily dismiss any references from them going forward?