maybe I am a sorry person, but she's advocating for a policy that doesn't benefit the wealthy, so pointing out that's she has a $6MM house seems like the actual strawman argument here.
and with your comment that she's "one of the most corrupt members of congress," you're pushing the argument way off topic here, (probably because your argument is shit) but what is your basis for even claiming that?
various sites peg her net worth as between $2-$3MM.
She's not even close to the top 50 wealthiest members of congress
she's been in congress since 1991, and not even cracking the top 50. If she's corrupt, she's not very good at it...