Election

[tigermud]

A grifter to the end.

Donations under $8K to Trump ?election defense? instead go to president, RNC

And a crapton of BLM contributions when to the DNC. I seldom give to any of these things just don?t trust where it all goes. Can?t trust anything really

 

[tigermud]

I can clearly see some of you are suffering from a lack of real substance during my time away..he’s still surviving. His understudy is leading a caravan to DC right now for a huge Saturday show of support for trump

https://banned.video/watch?id=5fac767eb0ba022e63f6a2a0

 

[Spartanmack]

Some of these challenges have been dismissed on procedural grounds, so courts aren't hearing and ruling on the merits of the claim. But I would wager the chances are pretty good that if the only lawyers Trump can find willing to take the case are bottom-feeder ones, like his Cooley Law school guy, who can't even draft a complaint correctly, and it gets dismissed for that reason, the case probably doesn't have much merit, and you can consider it debunked.

In other cases, yes, dismissing it is debunking it.

a lot of smoke, no fire so far.

This article, which has screenshots of Trump's
fundraising emails, implies these challenges are just another grift move to allow Trump to pay his campaign debt, and let the RNC wet its beak a little more:

After Election Day, the Trump campaign sent more than 130 emails soliciting campaign contributions, according to a tally maintained by the Twitter account @TrumpEmail. Most of those emails appear to be soliciting funds to support the legal effort that Trump claims will reverse the results of the election.
...
But if you read the fine print, money sent to the Election Defense Task Force will not necessarily be used to finance the Trump campaign's lawsuits. Donors are actually contributing to the Trump Make America Great Again Committee (TMAGAC), a joint fundraising committee of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and the Republican National Committee. 60% of the money donated to TMAGAC will go to pay the Trump campaign's debt and 40% will go to the general operating account of the Republican National Committee.

Money is only designated for recounts or other legal efforts if an individual donor reaches their legal limit or Trump retires his debt.
...
If Trump concedes, that money would come to a halt. You can't pretend to raise money for a legal challenge once you admit you've lost.
​

How much did you and tigermud pony up?

no, dismissing is not debunking. And I don't make political donations because I'm not sucker or a hypocrite unlike you (just to be clear, you're both and don't deny it because you've bragged on here several times about how you just lit another $100 on fire trying to get the loonbag moron Bernie Sanders elected).

 

[Spartanmack]

So you did understand after all. You just can never admit when you are wrong. Which is just about all the time. Next time I will use the quote button troll.


Seriously wtf is wrong with you ?

Bob, no one understands anything you post - and you only have 3 or 4 posts that you just keep repeating (the GOP is the most corrupt party in history and it's not even close, Harbaugh needs to recruit better linebackers (and whatever position the guy you just saw get burned plays), Don Brown doesn't know when to blitz or not blitz and anyone who asks you to make sense of your incoherent rants is a troll). Even if you used the quote button, what you posted had nothing to do with what I said, at all.

 

[Spartanmack]

Wall Street got their candidate(s) in office.

you would have posted this no matter who won.

 

[biggunsbob]

Bob, no one understands anything you post - and you only have 3 or 4 posts that you just keep repeating (the GOP is the most corrupt party in history and it's not even close, Harbaugh needs to recruit better linebackers (and whatever position the guy you just saw get burned plays), Don Brown doesn't know when to blitz or not blitz and anyone who asks you to make sense of your incoherent rants is a troll). Even if you used the quote button, what you posted had nothing to do with what I said, at all.

It?s funny how you remember what I had written on my page which I took off 1 or 2 years ago.
Maybe longer. Damn you are obsessed with me. Holy shit that is scary. Once a troll always a troll that is what you are.

 

[tinselwolverine]

It’s not the most likely time line now thank god but it does still lurk, she’s been rather quiet lately, wonder why

Facebook depresses me half my friends and family are all fighting with each other and it’s all going to get much worse yet before it gets better. I keep telling the half I agree with to go join Parler but they just won’t listen to me, stubborn jackasses

I’m not sure how long I’ll be back here for but happy to hear you are glad I’m positing here again. I hope someday I’ll be able to enjoy tigers and lions again.

Facebook is the place where attention starved people who haven’t had anything to do with each other in years go to blow sunshine up each other’s skirts.

The day will come when you’ll be able to enjoy Lions and Tigers again...the day when a motherfuckin’ cyclone blows your motherfuckin’ house to motherfuckin’ Oz and it lands on and kills a motherfuckin’ wicked witch.

 

[Michchamp]

no, dismissing is not debunking. And I don't make political donations because I'm not sucker or a hypocrite unlike you (just to be clear, you're both and don't deny it because you've bragged on here several times about how you just lit another $100 on fire trying to get the loonbag moron Bernie Sanders elected).

I just told you why dismissing is debunking, and your response is "Nuh uh." Nice. That's Real mature of you.

And you take politics seriously enough to come on here, get angry, call people names, obsessively insist on getting the last word in every single argument, you believe there's evidence the Democrats stole the presidential election from the rightful candidate, and Biden is corrupt enough to be a threat to the nation, yet you won't donate money to fight these credible election fraud allegations in court, and this makes you NOT hypocritical?

And why would you claim donating to Trump's legal fund would make you a sucker? You agree he's using these charges to defraud and bilk his base out of their hard-earned dollars here? Why care that the election was "stolen" from him then?

 

[byco42]

And Nancy could choose Hillary, don't tell sgg that he still thinks I'm crazy.
Nightmare scenarios still in play. my prediction Pence and Harris when the dust settles. late Jan. And the country is going to go through a tremendous amount of pain between now and then. Mainly from the BLM and Antifa bastards but law and order will prevail in the end.


oh and side note: the Durham report still isn't out yet, all that's coming down in the middle of all this yet also. buckle up

The acting President will not be able to choose a veep. The Senate does. The acting president is only in place until the election is completed.

 

[Spartanmack]

It?s funny how you remember what I had written on my page which I took off 1 or 2 years ago.
Maybe longer. Damn you are obsessed with me. Holy shit that is scary. Once a troll always a troll that is what you are.

you have a page? all those themes were taken directly from posts you've made repeatedly for years.

 

[tigermud]

Facebook is the place where attention starved people who haven?t had anything to do with each other in years go to blow sunshine up each other?s skirts.

The day will come when you?ll be able to enjoy Lions and Tigers again...the day when a motherfuckin? cyclone blows your motherfuckin? house to motherfuckin? Oz and it lands on and kills a motherfuckin? wicked witch.

Side note, I'm disappointed with Rogan, he seems to have already forgotten why he left CA

 

[byco42]

Side note, I'm disappointed with Rogan, he seems to have already forgotten why he left CA

The more money "alternative news" sources make, the more suspicious I am of their authenticity. It's like Edward the Longshanks buying off Scottish nobles with lands and titles.

 

[Spartanmack]

I just told you why dismissing is debunking, and your response is "Nuh uh." Nice. That's Real mature of you.

And you take politics seriously enough to come on here, get angry, call people names, obsessively insist on getting the last word in every single argument, you believe there's evidence the Democrats stole the presidential election from the rightful candidate, and Biden is corrupt enough to be a threat to the nation, yet you won't donate money to fight these credible election fraud allegations in court, and this makes you NOT hypocritical?

And why would you claim donating to Trump's legal fund would make you a sucker? You agree he's using these charges to defraud and bilk his base out of their hard-earned dollars here? Why care that the election was "stolen" from him then?

My response was not "Nuh uh". I just told you, you're wrong - again. Dismissing a case is not debunking. it's an interesting response from the guy who was resoundingly proven wrong about the ACA and just walked away, then when you were called out for it, with more evidence, just did some hand waiving and puking out a word salad in an attempt to reframe the argument. Again, it is amazing that you expect yourself to be taken seriously - it's amazing that you take yourself seriously.

I never get angry or call people names, unless they call me names first, then I do sometimes, but it's not out of anger. Yes, you finally got something kind of right - I'm opposed to money in politics so I don't donate money to politicians.

Choosing to spend my money more productively and in ways that benefit my family, causes I feel worthy of financial support and myself as well as in ways where I have greater control over how it is spent rather than sending it off to a politician, party or PAC doesn't make me a hypocrite. On the other hand, bitching about money in politics then turning around and writing checks to politicians is by definition, hypocritical - you do both, therefore you are a hypocrite.

I think everyone who donates to politicians, including Trump is a sucker - perhaps there are no bigger suckers than the idiots who donated to Bernie Sanders, but on some level, they're all suckers. Just because my political ideology aligns more with Republicans and Trump than Democrats and other morons, doesn't obligate me to give them any of my money. If at some point, I find a politician who I feel represents all or at least most that I stand for and that my money won't go to feed a corrupt system, I may reconsider my position, but right now, I think most of the money is spent against the people donating it to make the ruling class more powerful. I'm not so keen on paying people to take more and more control over my life. The idea that somehow makes me a hypocrite is monumentally stupid - it's a lot like the time you tried to say I was a hypocrite for supporting the 2nd Amendment even though I have never owned a gun or given a dime to the NRA. It's just moronic.

 

[tigermud]

I wouldn’t bet against her

https://youtu.be/Bi6U07gOHW4

 

[Gulo Blue]

not sure about that. doesn't the new congress start Jan 3rd been some talk about her not being renewed for speaker will she still be the speaker by Jan 20th? perhaps..idk..I can't stand the thought of your scenario that's just a horrible thought.

Trump should tweet that the dems are talking about making AOC speaker so that she can become president instead of him or Biden. And then ask for more money.

 

[byco42]

Trump should tweet that the dems are talking about making AOC speaker so that she can become president instead of him or Biden. And then ask for more money.

AOC is too young by four years. #civics

 

[Thumb]

AOC is too young by four years. #civics

Yeah, but if it's a Trump tweet, what difference does it make if the details are correct or not?

 

[Gulo Blue]

AOC is too young by four years. #civics

I'm not saying there could be any truth to it, I'm just saying Trump should tweet it to rile up his base. They'll believe anything.

 

[byco42]

I'm not saying there could be any truth to it, I'm just saying Trump should tweet it to rile up his base. They'll believe anything.

Everyone believes anything these days. Just different things.

 

[tinselwolverine]

AOC is too young by four years. #civics

When then did the whole line of succession thing, did they make age qualifications for Speaker and president Pro Tempore?