Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Election

I just want to see this 'kraken' period. So much hot air coming from the 'good guys' lately. Very little substance.

I fully expect nothing to come of it and they will blame 'dark forces', 'deep state', and other boogiemen that will please you, byco, and many many others. "The script is written, the plan is in motion...blah blah blah."

I hear ya, and I can?t rule that out either. If that happens it won?t please me at all though. I can?t speak for byco.
 
I know what the mythical sea monster ?Kraken? is, but who originally dubbed the overwhelming evidence that will overturn the election results the ?Kraken?? I?m hearing it referred to as such in various places.

EDIT: Found it.

Why would Zeus have dominion over the Kraken? It seems to me that would be Poseidon?s realm.

Powell started it, it was something she first said week or so back
 
JFK, Woodrow Wilson, David Rockefeller, GHWB, Kissinger ... just a small sample of a long list of people who have acknowledged the existence of secret societies that influence geo-political events.

57 years anniversary tomorrow
 
giphy.gif
 
Can't use the CIA. They're a tangible, real organization. You need something spooky and mysterious. That way you can't really prove it wrong, even if they can't prove it right.



Jesus?
 
Last edited:
Powell started it, it was something she first said week or so back

Yes, but not completely.

She was quoting a line spoken by Laurence Olivier playing Zeus in ?Clash of the Titans,? a movie from 1981.

When I posted ?I found it,? did you think that could have possibly meant I didn?t find out everything important about it?
 
https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-g...ote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html

In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth.

In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below):
https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds

A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week.

Original data sets:
https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6

"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election)."
 
https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-g...ote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html

In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth.

In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below):
https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds

A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week.

Original data sets:
https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6

"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election).

They didn?t vote for her, because she?s a chick.
 
"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election)."

So the claim is that Dominion software is not just vulnerable to mass hacking but designed to engineer it?

Why have 20+ states, many of them controlled by Republicans, turned their elections over to a communist-controlled software program designed to manufacture Democratic votes? And one that, according to Giuliani, has been engaged in a systematic international vote fraud scheme for the better part of two decades?

For that matter, if the China-Soros conspiracy is able to manipulate voting totals through its Dominion software, why didn?t they produce the handful of votes they needed to stop Donald Trump in 2016? Or, for that matter, to throw a few more Senate races the Democrats way?
 
So the claim is that Dominion software is not just vulnerable to mass hacking but designed to engineer it?

Why have 20+ states, many of them controlled by Republicans, turned their elections over to a communist-controlled software program designed to manufacture Democratic votes? And one that, according to Giuliani, has been engaged in a systematic international vote fraud scheme for the better part of two decades?

For that matter, if the China-Soros conspiracy is able to manipulate voting totals through its Dominion software, why didn?t they produce the handful of votes they needed to stop Donald Trump in 2016? Or, for that matter, to throw a few more Senate races the Democrats way?

Because it only performs it?s chicanery in states that are controlled by Democrats, duh...

People are such sheep...
 
The Georgia recount was not an audit, it was just a recount. At best a recount will find human and other errors, of which they caught several. They’re not looking for fraud, they didn’t do signature verification or look for other ballot irregularities. They weren’t looking for fraud so the fact that didn’t find it isn’t proof that it didn’t happen. Fraud is extremely difficult to detect even when you’re looking for it, especially when you have people trying to undermine and defy the efforts to investigate it. I find it especially funny that the one guy who is constantly railing against voting machines, electronic tabulation, etc is now defending the process and legitimacy of the election, particularly in a year of unprecedented levels of mail in voting that 46 states weren’t prepared for.
 
Last edited:
The Georgia recount was not an audit, it was just a recount. At best a recount will find human and other errors, of which they caught several. They?re not looking for fraud, they didn?t do signature verification or look for other ballot irregularities. They weren?t looking for fraud so the fact that didn?t find it isn?t proof that it didn?t happen. Fraud is extremely difficult to detect even when you?re looking for it, especially when you have people trying to undermine and defy the efforts to investigate it. I find it especially funny that the one guy who is constantly railing against voting machines, electronic tabulation, etc is now defending the process and legitimacy of the election, particularly in a year of unprecedented levels of mail in voting that 46 states weren?t prepared for.


Sounds like Trump should hire you to go to Georgia and root out voter fraud!
 
The Georgia recount was not an audit, it was just a recount. At best a recount will find human and other errors, of which they caught several. They?re not looking for fraud, they didn?t do signature verification or look for other ballot irregularities. They weren?t looking for fraud so the fact that didn?t find it isn?t proof that it didn?t happen. Fraud is extremely difficult to detect even when you?re looking for it, especially when you have people trying to undermine and defy the efforts to investigate it. I find it especially funny that the one guy who is constantly railing against voting machines, electronic tabulation, etc is now defending the process and legitimacy of the election, particularly in a year of unprecedented levels of mail in voting that 46 states weren?t prepared for.

It's amazing the Republicans have ever won a single election when you put it like that.
 
Back
Top