Sbee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2013
- Messages
- 9,259
the policies I advocate are extremely effective at what they are designed for - reducing crime. They are remarkable successes, not failures in any way. Getting rid of them won't do anything to help the addiction epidemic but it will most certainly have a negative impact on crime.
As for your claim about millions of nonviolent offenders caught up in the system, there are a maximum of 550k people incarcerated for drug related crimes - including violent offenders. I have no idea what % of those offenders are nonviolent but it's definitely not all of them. That's also true for people on parole and probation. So to say there are millions of nonviolent victims in the system is probably as incorrect as saying the system is racially biased.
Do you know what's great for reducing crime? reducing the demand for illegal drugs. The policies you advocate are really good at mass incarceration and keeping poor black people in jail for crimes white people commit at the same rate. If we lock people up at exponentially higher rates than other G8 countries, why do we have more crime? How do these countries manage to be safer than us without locking up so many citizens?
http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Total-crimes