- Thread Author
- #1
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedI'm not the biggest Stafford fan, but what's the point of this thread? Big Ben just set a record for most TDs in consecutive games. That's wonderful, but despite all his TDs the Steelers are 6-3 while the Lions are 6-2. One of the knocks against Stafford has always been that he puts up great numbers, but doesn't get wins when it counts. Now that he's getting wins this year, we're going to knock him for not having numbers? Doesn't make much sense to me. I've always just asked for consistency in his decisions and accuracy above all else, and that's what's more concerning than a lack of TDs.
You don't need to throw 6 touchdown passes in a game to be successful. It's just stat inflating.
Where are these great numbers Stafford has put up?
He has routinely been ranked middle of the pack, except one year.
It's what they do. They'll bitch about the wins if he puts up numbers.....they'll bitch about the numbers if he puts up wins. It's old....but they continue to do it.
Russell Wilson didn't complete 50% of his passes yesterday and BARELY beat the fuckin 0-7 Raiders. I wonder what the "fans" on this board would say if Stafford did that?
I'll take W's!
Russell Wilson didn't complete 50% of his passes yesterday and BARELY beat the fuckin 0-7 Raiders. I wonder what the "fans" on this board would say if Stafford did that?
I'll take W's!
I'm not the biggest Stafford fan, but what's the point of this thread? Big Ben just set a record for most TDs in consecutive games. That's wonderful, but despite all his TDs the Steelers are 6-3 while the Lions are 6-2. One of the knocks against Stafford has always been that he puts up great numbers, but doesn't get wins when it counts. Now that he's getting wins this year, we're going to knock him for not having numbers? Doesn't make much sense to me. I've always just asked for consistency in his decisions and accuracy above all else, and that's what's more concerning than a lack of TDs.
You don't need to throw 6 touchdown passes in a game to be successful. It's just stat inflating.
Because Matt is still below average. The 6-2 is mostly defense and that's great but honestly Matt hasn't done jack shit. And the consistency you ask for above all else is the reason he's below average. He's consistent.
Has nothing to do about TD's. His overall game has been lacking badly.
I'll take 25 TD's in a season..if it comes with 6 INT and a good completion % and a good YPA or thereabouts. And consistency in hitting the open guys, and not making bad reads. I think we all would..
But outside Tate the offense has been lackluster. Not just Matt but he's part of it and because he's the QB gets a lot of the blame. Just the way it is ..
I don't disagree with any of that. Stafford deserves to be have his game critiqued, and I myself am not a huge supporter of his. I guess all I was trying to say is that it doesn't take 12 TDs in two games to be a good QB and it's not something we should be expecting or looking for out of Stafford. I didn't understand the point of the thread in general. You said yourself it has nothing to do about TD's...but that's what the original post was all about.
The point of the thread was all the Stafford slappys always have an excuse as to why Stafford is average. No one is saying he needs to throw 6 td's a game, but people on this board like to call him elite. Elite is not throwing just over 1 td a game.
I don't think there is only one person on this board that thinks he is elite. I think 90% of the posters feel that Stafford is an above average QB which means in that 12-15 range.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!