- Thread Author
- #1
Rebbiv
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Messages
- 6,305
This is a classic debate. We would all like our Tigers to be there. But, we tend to be bias in our evaluation (as do the voters).
So, looking at Baseball References Hall of Fame Monitor (i don't necessarily like it, but it is a way to judge without bias).
Normally, score above 100 is a likely HoFer. I added former and current Tiger players, with a few "control" players added.
T. Cobb 445
C. Ripken 236
I. Rodriguez 226
H. Greenberg 188
J. Morgan 172
A. Kaline 160
R. Sandberg 158
G. Sheffield 156
J. Rice 144
O. Smith 142
H. Newhouser 140
G. Carter 135
R. Yount 132
A. Pettitte 123
J. Morris 122
M. Mussina 121
B. Blyleven 120
C. Fisk 120
B. Larkin 120
O. Vizquel 120
A. Trammell 118
A. Dawson 118
R. Ashburn 113
M. Cabrera 113
M. Ordonez 112
N. Garciaparra 112
R. Schoendienst 110
W. McCovey 110
R. Ferrell 109
R. Campanella 108
J. Kendall 108
L. Parrish 107
W. Stargell 106
P. Reese 100
M. Lolich 98
J. Bunning 98
B. Doerr 96
E. Slaughter 96
D. McLain 92
L. Whitaker 92
B. Sutter 91
G. Kell 90
B. Freehan 84
T. Perez 81
T. Jones 78
L. Doby 76
B. Mazeroski 71
J. Verlander 62
N. Cash 50
W. Horton 30
Again, this is an attempt to be objective and not subjective. Certainly, Morris, Trammell and Parrish belong in the H0F.
The argument would be for Lolich, Whitaker and Freehan. The case would be if Bunning, why not Lolich? With Whitaker, it is Mazeroski.
So, looking at Baseball References Hall of Fame Monitor (i don't necessarily like it, but it is a way to judge without bias).
Normally, score above 100 is a likely HoFer. I added former and current Tiger players, with a few "control" players added.
T. Cobb 445
C. Ripken 236
I. Rodriguez 226
H. Greenberg 188
J. Morgan 172
A. Kaline 160
R. Sandberg 158
G. Sheffield 156
J. Rice 144
O. Smith 142
H. Newhouser 140
G. Carter 135
R. Yount 132
A. Pettitte 123
J. Morris 122
M. Mussina 121
B. Blyleven 120
C. Fisk 120
B. Larkin 120
O. Vizquel 120
A. Trammell 118
A. Dawson 118
R. Ashburn 113
M. Cabrera 113
M. Ordonez 112
N. Garciaparra 112
R. Schoendienst 110
W. McCovey 110
R. Ferrell 109
R. Campanella 108
J. Kendall 108
L. Parrish 107
W. Stargell 106
P. Reese 100
M. Lolich 98
J. Bunning 98
B. Doerr 96
E. Slaughter 96
D. McLain 92
L. Whitaker 92
B. Sutter 91
G. Kell 90
B. Freehan 84
T. Perez 81
T. Jones 78
L. Doby 76
B. Mazeroski 71
J. Verlander 62
N. Cash 50
W. Horton 30
Again, this is an attempt to be objective and not subjective. Certainly, Morris, Trammell and Parrish belong in the H0F.
The argument would be for Lolich, Whitaker and Freehan. The case would be if Bunning, why not Lolich? With Whitaker, it is Mazeroski.