Internet Censorship.

[tinselwolverine]

musta been in one I didn't post, I don't post any and all of them, it was something about also making a W sign with the other hand is required apparently for it to signify a white supremacist sign. :shrug:

Now that you mention it I do kind of recall that from some video-maybe it?s the one you?re talking about.

Nevertheless, I think they should go with the official JDL approved sign that I linked to in post #887.

 

[tigermud]

The social media monopoly has suspended activist and commentator Candace Owens for the crime of claiming that liberal policies incentivize fatherless homes in the black community.


Owens was hit with a 7 day ban for posting, ?Black America must wake up to the great liberal hoax. White supremacy is not a threat. Liberal supremacy is.?


She then included a screenshot of a tweet which pointed out that the poverty rate amongst married blacks is 7 per cent, compared to 22 per cent for blacks generally.
?My @facebook page has been suspended for 7 days for posting that white supremacy is not a threat to black America, as much as father absence and & liberal policies that incentivize it, are,? she tweeted. ?I am censored for posting the poverty rates in fatherless homes.?


?Facebook has allowed every post that has falsely and horribly accused @realDonaldTrump of white supremacy to remain on its platform,? said Owens. ?But when a black woman begins discussing the TRUTH?which is that liberal policies have systematically ruined black homes?they censor.?

 

[Michchamp]

The social media monopoly has suspended activist and commentator Candace Owens for the crime of claiming that liberal policies incentivize fatherless homes in the black community.


Owens was hit with a 7 day ban for posting, ?Black America must wake up to the great liberal hoax. White supremacy is not a threat. Liberal supremacy is.?


She then included a screenshot of a tweet which pointed out that the poverty rate amongst married blacks is 7 per cent, compared to 22 per cent for blacks generally.
?My @facebook page has been suspended for 7 days for posting that white supremacy is not a threat to black America, as much as father absence and & liberal policies that incentivize it, are,? she tweeted. ?I am censored for posting the poverty rates in fatherless homes.?


?Facebook has allowed every post that has falsely and horribly accused @realDonaldTrump of white supremacy to remain on its platform,? said Owens. ?But when a black woman begins discussing the TRUTH?which is that liberal policies have systematically ruined black homes?they censor.?

"liberal supremacy" LOL.

What are they in charge of?

 

[byco42]

Aw come on, when have YOU ever sinned?

Seriously? I can't count that high.

 

[tinselwolverine]

The social media monopoly has suspended activist and commentator Candace Owens for the crime of claiming that liberal policies incentivize fatherless homes in the black community.

If it wasn?t for this post I would have never heard of Candace Owens.

I would have never read anything she had to say although it?s nothing new-Farrakhan and many others have said shit like this for years.

Did she engage in any kind of hateful speech like anti-Semitic speech the way Farrakhan does?

Anyway, this is further evidence that ?De-platforming? actually serves the purpose of free speech and the marketplace of ideas.

Of course it goes without saying that Candace Owens is crazy.

Because she?s a chick.

 

[byco42]

"liberal supremacy" LOL.

What are they in charge of?

Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, apparently. The U.S. House of Representatives, The Public School System, most universities, Google, Planned Parenthood, NPR, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS ? for starters. It's more an "it" than a "they."

 

[tinselwolverine]

Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, apparently. The U.S. House of Representatives, The Public School System, most universities, Google, Planned Parenthood, NPR, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS ? for starters. It's more an "it" than a "they."

Let?s not leave out the Catholic Church-minus abortion the other social issue stuff.

 

[byco42]

Let?s not leave out the Catholic Church-minus abortion the other social issue stuff.

Definitely an internecine battle but not a "supremacy"

 

[Michchamp]

Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, apparently. The U.S. House of Representatives, The Public School System, most universities, Google, Planned Parenthood, NPR, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS ? for starters. It's more an "it" than a "they."

"most universities"... but not obviously the football mills, which is a lot of them. At Penn State, Republicans were able to aid and abet their football buddy raping little boys on university property... possibly for decades.

And even our beloved alma mater takes defense industry money to design weapons, right?

This passed year, there was a bit of scandal in Ann Arbor over this. Hardly the work of a liberal-controlled school right? Unless you're like me, and you understand there's not as much difference between the Hillary Clintons, Nancy Pelosis, and Mitch McConnells of the world as we're lead to believe.

 

[byco42]

"most universities"... but not obviously the football mills, which is a lot of them. At Penn State, Republicans were able to aid and abet their football buddy raping little boys on university property... possibly for decades.

And even our beloved alma mater takes defense industry money to design weapons, right?

This passed year, there was a bit of scandal in Ann Arbor over this. Hardly the work of a liberal-controlled school right? Unless you're like me, and you understand there's not as much difference between the Hillary Clintons, Nancy Pelosis, and Mitch McConnells of the world as we're lead to believe.

I've maintained this for years.

 

[tinselwolverine]

"most universities"... but not obviously the football mills, which is a lot of them. At Penn State, Republicans were able to aid and abet their football buddy raping little boys on university property... possibly for decades.

And even our beloved alma mater takes defense industry money to design weapons, right?

This passed year, there was a bit of scandal in Ann Arbor over this. Hardly the work of a liberal-controlled school right? Unless you're like me, and you understand there's not as much difference between the Hillary Clintons, Nancy Pelosis, and Mitch McConnells of the world as we're lead to believe.

So which is it?

Is the defense industry Republican and it has shut down every time Dems have been in power since Lincoln was president, or has the military industrial complex always been bi-partisan? You kind of just said-or implied both things.

Also I don?t think the Jerry Sandusky thing had anything to do with partisan politics.

 

[Spartanmack]

If it wasn?t for this post I would have never heard of Candace Owens.

I would have never read anything she had to say although it?s nothing new-Farrakhan and many others have said shit like this for years.

Did she engage in any kind of hateful speech like anti-Semitic speech the way Farrakhan does?

Anyway, this is further evidence that ?De-platforming? actually serves the purpose of free speech and the marketplace of ideas.

Of course it goes without saying that Candace Owens is crazy.

Because she?s a chick.

I can't say for sure but I feel like she has come up in another thread sometime in the last couple of years and I seem to recall a discussion about her positions as well as her pleasant appearance. I thought you were involved in that conversation but maybe not.

 

[Spartanmack]

"most universities"... but not obviously the football mills, which is a lot of them. At Penn State, Republicans were able to aid and abet their football buddy raping little boys on university property... possibly for decades.

And even our beloved alma mater takes defense industry money to design weapons, right?

This passed year, there was a bit of scandal in Ann Arbor over this. Hardly the work of a liberal-controlled school right? Unless you're like me, and you understand there's not as much difference between the Hillary Clintons, Nancy Pelosis, and Mitch McConnells of the world as we're lead to believe.

it's amazing that people think uofm is so liberal when it's so clearly in the grasp of the neo-cons.

 

[tinselwolverine]

I can't say for sure but I feel like she has come up in another thread sometime in the last couple of years and I seem to recall a discussion about her positions as well as her pleasant appearance. I thought you were involved in that conversation but maybe not.

I don?t recall it, but far more important than what a woman thinks is how hot she is.

 

[Spartanmack]

I don?t recall it, but far more important than what a woman thinks is how hot she is.

I don't know that it's necessarily more important but according to the hot/crazy matrix, the hotter, the crazier which would imply at some level of hotness that's probably true.

 

[Michchamp]

it's amazing that people think uofm is so liberal when it's so clearly in the grasp of the neo-cons.

I'm not saying that at all. point is, throwing around these labels doesn't describe the reality of the situation at all or who's in charge

 

[tigermud]

If it wasn?t for this post I would have never heard of Candace Owens.

I would have never read anything she had to say although it?s nothing new-Farrakhan and many others have said shit like this for years.

Did she engage in any kind of hateful speech like anti-Semitic speech the way Farrakhan does?

Anyway, this is further evidence that ?De-platforming? actually serves the purpose of free speech and the marketplace of ideas.

Of course it goes without saying that Candace Owens is crazy.

Because she?s a chick.

You don?t pay much attention to politics then I guess she is a rising star conservative whom did a fantastic job testifying in front of congress not that long ago, I?m sure you?ll be hearing a lot more about her in the future

 

[tinselwolverine]

You don?t pay much attention to politics then I guess she is a rising star conservative whom did a fantastic job testifying in front of congress not that long ago, I?m sure you?ll be hearing a lot more about her in the future

Everything is relative.

I would say that a person who knows of every single person that testified in front of Congress within the ?not too long ago? definitely pays a whole lot of attention to politics.

I know I don?t know every single one-but my guess is you don?t either.

EDIT: Apparently-according to her opening in a congressional hearing a whole lot of journalists whose job it is to pay a lot of attention to politics didn?t know who she was either.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RmuFIM4meXg

 

[tigermud]

She?ll run for Congress one day and win

 

[tinselwolverine]

She?ll run for Congress one day and win

We?ll see.

Maybe she?ll run for president one day and win.

She just turned 30-she?s right around the same age as AOC.

EDIT: Damn-she and AOC are less than six months apart in age.

If she gets elected while AOC is still in office that would make a hell of a premise for a porn movie-?Hostile Hotties on the Hill.?