sggatecl
Senior Member
Packers got lucky it was the easiest part of their schedule. They went 3-5 without Rodgers. Lions had worse injuries and harder games so far. If Rodgers hurt the first 6-7 games, they don't win a game.
Packers schedule with Hundley:
Vikings L (Lions split, Packers still play them at home)
Saints L (Lions lost)
Lions L (Will play 2nd game w/Rodgers)
Bears W (Lions won)
Ravens L (Lions lost)
Steelers L (Lions lost)
Buccaneers W (Lions won)
Browns W (Lions won)
Records are extremely similiar against the same competition. So if it was the 'easier' part of the schedule, why didn't the Lions have a much better record? Your 'Lions have worse injuries' is bullshit. If the Lions lose Stafford they go 0-8..possibly 1-7 because the Browns are the Browns.
It's unacceptable that Detroit came out of that stretch only one game better. Even if you buy into the narrative that Rodgers going down doesn't gift them the division, you can't keep a straight face and say that only being up one game after that stretch is acceptable.
If Rodgers hurt the first 6-7 games, they don't win a game.
Exactly, you're making my argument for me. That's how much that injury matters.
Last edited: