Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Liberal Leftist Moonbats on Display

To be in fair, reports from Berkeley today indicate that very few believe that any of the 150 black clad terrorists were Berkeley students. They seem to be part of an anarchist organization that calls itself a "Anti--Far," or something like that. I'm hearing news that the terrorists were physically assaulting students participating in the peaceful protest.

It does seem unlikely to me that a person would jeopardize the future benefits that a degree from Berkeley can bring by doing something so stupid as to participate in violence at a protest.

Weird thing is that-at least in my opinion-Milo is pretty unimportant. He's basically a political humorist like Ann Coulter or Bill Mahar or Chelsea Handler - he is hardly worth participating even in a peaceful protest against.

I'm hearing that no arrests were made. I'm hearing people saying that the police were actually doing nothing.

Maybe Berkley is so liberal that the police there have actually become lefties themselves, and view criminals as victims.

maybe it was more than just a few students. The Daily Californian (Cal Berkeley's paper) has been publishing oped from students defending the violence...

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13289...m_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=lead
 
maybe it was more than just a few students. The Daily Californian (Cal Berkeley's paper) has been publishing oped from students defending the violence...

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13289...m_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=lead

Well...now that there are identifiable students claiming to possibly have been participants in the terrorism, maybe the Berkeley police can actually do something - question these people and if there's evidence to charge them with crimes, charge them with crimes.
 
Does anyone else get the sense that we're close to a point of no return in this county?

https://youtu.be/OzeTZSEesXY

The divide is just bad really bad



I watched the whole video, where was the part where the thug threatened to murder the other guy?

The only threat that was made, was by the guy who said touch my truck and "see what happens".

FAKE NEWS
 
I watched the whole video, where was the part where the thug threatened to murder the other guy?

The only threat that was made, was by the guy who said touch my truck and "see what happens".

FAKE NEWS

I think that was implied by the reality that he pulled out a gun and said we'll see what happens.
 
I mean I don't know about the rest of you but if someone pulled out a gun and said we'll see what happens after I say something stupid I would take that to be a threat to kill me.
 
That video is a healthy reminder of why I have a CPL.

Also, is it a coincidence that this thread gets bumped every time Trump makes an ass out of himself?
 
That video is a healthy reminder of why I have a CPL.

Also, is it a coincidence that this thread gets bumped every time Trump makes an ass out of himself?


Sorry wasn't trying to distracted from any trump bashing, Carry on I haven't seen the full trump presser yet..
 
I mean I don't know about the rest of you but if someone pulled out a gun and said we'll see what happens after I say something stupid I would take that to be a threat to kill me.



Well some on the right might argue that he was simply carrying a military style assault rifle for self defense purposes as the other guy already made a threat, as would be his 2nd amendment right.

I'm playing devils advocate here, but I can easily counter any argument you can make using the right's own logic.

Also, it's pretty hard to prove whats "implied".
 
Well some on the right might argue that he was simply carrying a military style assault rifle for self defense purposes as the other guy already made a threat, as would be his 2nd amendment right.

I'm playing devils advocate here, but I can easily counter any argument you can make using the right's own logic.

Also, it's pretty hard to prove whats "implied".

Who do you think would win that argument

Guy A says don't touch my shit man or you'll see what happens while walking away into a store without showing any form of weapon, not even a fist raised or

Guy B whom pulls out an assault weapon and says we'll see what happens alright while walking over to guy A's shit to damage it, don't know if he proceeded to damage it or not mind you

In court that is

I'd place that bet on Guy B losing every time in the scenario
 
Last edited:
Sorry wasn't trying to distracted from any trump bashing, Carry on I haven't seen the full trump presser yet..

Let's just put it this way. Here is unaltered footage of the SNL writing team after the presser ended:

hSOUN8G.gif
 
Let's just put it this way. Here is unaltered footage of the SNL writing team after the presser ended:

hSOUN8G.gif


Should be good! they are a lot funnier now with those trump segments and the spicer stuff is hilarious

Hey trump made SNL great again!
 
Should be good! they are a lot funnier now with those trump segments and the spicer stuff is hilarious

Hey trump made SNL great again!

'Spicy' on a Segway/podium had me rolling. I have enjoyed their last few shows. Didn't watch much recently before that, not sure how bad/good it was pre Trump, maybe someone else could speak to that.
 
Last edited:
Who do you think would win that argument

Guy A says don't touch my shit man or you'll see what happens while walking away into a store without showing any form of weapon, not even a fist raised or

Guy B whom pulls out an assault weapon and says we'll see what happens alright while walking over to guy A's shit to damage it, don't know if he proceeded to damage it or not mind you

In court that is

I'd place that bet on Guy B losing every time in the scenario

never mind what would happen in court, Thumb is losing this argument badly right now. He thinks he's "using the right's own logic" to "counter every argument" but he's just digging himself deeper into a hole without realizing how illogical he's being. First, guy A didn't really issue a threat, he was responding to a threat. He warned guy B that he would defend his property against the threat of assault against his property - perfectly within his rights. The idea that guy b thinks he's defending himself from a threat is laughably stupid, one of the dumbest things posted here in a long time. The excuse that he is just using the the rights logic against them is simply moronic.
 
Back
Top