- Thread Author
- #1
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get Startedcould be a very big IF mitch....as in IF mayhew & schwartz are willing to stake their jobs on him...
could be a very big IF mitch....as in IF mayhew & schwartz are willing to stake their jobs on him...
is putting a retard on IR for 2 games really showing accountability? When you cant cut a retard cause you cant afford to do so cause you have no talent at a position you draft or trade for every single year....welp its simply sad and again speaks to how horrible we are at talent evaluation.
Broyles is a talented WR, but he suffered an injury. Burleson is talented and is a huge leader on this team. Mike Thomas is a talented WR also, but he was thrown into the fire immediately in a complicated system. Even that Durham kid looked ok and he was on the practice squad. Wtf are you talking about?
You'd complain if we cut him because we'd definitely be drafting another WR. You complain because we might keep him because you don't like him and think he's trash. All you do is complain about everything..lol.
Burleson talks about Young in high praise. I'll take his word over anybody on this board that the kid can ball. We seen it his rookie year...
What?? hughes complain?? You must be mistaken Tony. That dude is a regular Tony Robbins!!!!
Hughes is the type of guy that complained that Barry Sanders had too many negative carries!!
yet youre using our WR corps as an excuse for stafford not being up to par in another thread. Id rather be a complainer than a hippocrit
Hypocrite? I just pointed out that Stafford never had a set core of guys to work with all year. It seemed liked a different WR was thrown in the mix every week. Only an idiot would think that we don't have talented wideouts on this team.
Get it right.
So everyone is talented but we only outscore our opponents 4 times out of 16? So its coaching?
Now you`re reaching..lol. All im saying is we have WRs on this team who are talented besides #81. But of course you wont admit that.
how can i possibly admit it? Im a realist and ive always been a realist....i need to see it first! There absolutely no production from ANYONE on our offense not named calvin johnson. Not leshoure, not broyles, not titus, not nate....not anyone. Pettigrew is great for about 80 6 yard curls a year. So far theyre swing n misses. I was actually comming around on broyles this year....then he goes and makes himself a cripple again. I dont even know if titus will be back. And nate is overpaid. If it wasnt for the oline the offense would be in more shambles than the defense that needs 8 new starters. and the oline isnt that good....
Pettigrew is a 700 yard tight end for 2 years in a row (2010/2011). On his way this year to 700 until he got hurt.
Broyles showed he was productive in his limited time. Can't wait until he comes back so you'll shut the hell up about drafting him.
Burleson was having a decent year before his injury. Big TD catch against the Eagles in the come back and big TD catch against the Titans for a lead(that loss was not the offense except for Raoila). He has produced for the Lions and did so in 2010/2011 as well. He's a nice compliment in the slot.
Young had a knee injury and then unfortunately became a headache. 4 Tds were helpful though in what 10 games and a big part in one win. That plus 2011 shows Titus has talent just no brains being a hot head. Notice in the 4 wins(.500 ball) half way thorugh and the 3 other games we had tough teams(Pack, Houston, Indy) on the ropes very late with leads we should have won, Stafford had good WRs and Pettigrew. Detroit was ridiculously close to 7-5 when they had their weapons. Throw in Tennesee/Minnesota special teams fiascos and they are 9-3 through 12 games with weapons.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!