Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Offseason Arrests Have Begun

LMMFAO

Looks like I got in that tiny little head of yours.

Keep spoutin your stupidity....this is fun!

nope...just following suit....you do it every thread. gotta stoop to your level to get through to you. If you think getting physical with your childs mother right infront of the kid is acceptable....then I don't know what to tell you. The fact youre supporting his decision makes you a fucking idiot. Again...I don't care whos fault it is....you don't get your kid involved and you don't EVER let it get to the point where the kid who shouldn't even fucking be there gets hit. The fact she was taken to prison means nothing considering he was too:

according to police. p> Spievey, a part-time starter in his first three NFL seasons, is accused of putting his hand around the neck of his girlfriend, Lisa Marie Santos, and pushing her while he carried their 2-year-old daughter, according to a police report posted on the Middletown Press website.

Spievey was charged with Class C felony third-degree assault, Class A misdemeanor risk of injury to a child and Class C misdemeanor disorderly conduct

Both were released on a $5,000 bond and appeared in Middletown Superior Court today where judge David P. Gold issued protective orders against Spievey and Santos, according to a court clerk
 
Last edited:
These athletes should really think twice about these chicken-head bitches that they're laying up with. They have enough money to get a vasectomy and then get a reverse vasectomy later on.

I can't lie, that's always been a fear of mine; having a fucking nutcase of a baby momma. Came thiiiiiiiiis close, then the blood test proved otherwise :)
 
If he can't beat the crap out of a woman how do you expect him to do against NFL players?
 
First point I will make is that we have no idea how this all started. It's easy to say "Don't let the kid be there" but he was holding his daughter. Did he pick her up to get her out of the line of fire of a crazy bitch? It seems pretty unlikely to me that he grabbed his daughter to use a two year old as a human shield, so it may be that he was picking his daughter up to take her away from the fight when the punches started flying.

Second Point: While it says he placed his hand on her neck, she also told police the small red mark came as a result of him pushing her away, and that he did not choke her. So the statement that he "put his hand around her neck" is already invalidated by the statement of the angry victim.

Third point: I think it's pretty uncalled for to assume blame towards a man holding his kid, who was being repeatedly punched, and who only pushed the attacker off of him. It sounds very much to me like he did exactly what he should have to protect his kid. He was not the aggressor, he was the victim of an assault.

Reports state that he told his daughter "Don't grow up to be like your momma"... which might be fucked up to say, but we all say stupid stuff when angry.

After he said it, she started punching... with his kid in his arms. Sorry man, she is dead in the wrong, and he was 100% right to respond by pushing her away before his child could be hurt.

When a woman starts throwing punches what are you expected to do... ask for a time out so you can get your kid out of harms way? He pushed her off. Reports say she hit him in the chest repeatedly, he pushed her off, and then she hit him in the back repeatedly. Do the math... she started throwing blows, he pushed her off, and then turned his back so she couldn't hit the kid.

He did right, and I am pretty sure any jury will see it too. The momma should do some time, but Amari did exactly what any father in his shoes should and would do. He didn't lay her out. He didn't kick her. He pushed her off of him.

Not only is that self defense and the defense of his child, but it's not even agressive self defense.
 
First point I will make is that we have no idea how this all started. It's easy to say "Don't let the kid be there" but he was holding his daughter. Did he pick her up to get her out of the line of fire of a crazy bitch? It seems pretty unlikely to me that he grabbed his daughter to use a two year old as a human shield, so it may be that he was picking his daughter up to take her away from the fight when the punches started flying.

Second Point: While it says he placed his hand on her neck, she also told police the small red mark came as a result of him pushing her away, and that he did not choke her. So the statement that he "put his hand around her neck" is already invalidated by the statement of the angry victim.

Third point: I think it's pretty uncalled for to assume blame towards a man holding his kid, who was being repeatedly punched, and who only pushed the attacker off of him. It sounds very much to me like he did exactly what he should have to protect his kid. He was not the aggressor, he was the victim of an assault.

Reports state that he told his daughter "Don't grow up to be like your momma"... which might be fucked up to say, but we all say stupid stuff when angry.

After he said it, she started punching... with his kid in his arms. Sorry man, she is dead in the wrong, and he was 100% right to respond by pushing her away before his child could be hurt.

When a woman starts throwing punches what are you expected to do... ask for a time out so you can get your kid out of harms way? He pushed her off. Reports say she hit him in the chest repeatedly, he pushed her off, and then she hit him in the back repeatedly. Do the math... she started throwing blows, he pushed her off, and then turned his back so she couldn't hit the kid.

He did right, and I am pretty sure any jury will see it too. The momma should do some time, but Amari did exactly what any father in his shoes should and would do. He didn't lay her out. He didn't kick her. He pushed her off of him.

Not only is that self defense and the defense of his child, but it's not even agressive self defense.

i dont try to sort out all the details.....im a realist....and the reality is he was sent to prison on 3 different counts. If he did nothing wrong guess what.....he wouldnt have gone to prison. Now i dont know the laws in connecticut it could very well be that in a domestic dispute both parties get sent to jail....but in the 1 million episodes of cops ive seen......i dont think ive ever seen a man arrested if he didnt do anything and i almost never see both parties get cuffed if the other party didnt do anything. Admitingly, i see the headline of "spievey charged with domestic violence, child endangerment" and i made an off color comment. Its not my job to figure out the facts and diagnose what happened...im looking at the fact him and his baby mamma got in a fight with his daughter right there and the daughter was hit/pushed whatever. The obvious answer to the problem would be get the child to safety then hit the mom with a bat for putting your daughter in danger :D
 
I certainly can't speak to the laws in his state, but in Arizona where I live in a domestic violence case both parties are charged, period.

If a man hits his wife, she is arrested as well. It's up to the DA to decide prosecution but the police are required by law to charge them.

He was taken to jail for processing. He has not been convicted of anything, simply charged.
 
i dont try to sort out all the details.....im a realist....and the reality is he was sent to prison on 3 different counts. If he did nothing wrong guess what.....he wouldnt have gone to prison. Now i dont know the laws in connecticut it could very well be that in a domestic dispute both parties get sent to jail....but in the 1 million episodes of cops ive seen......i dont think ive ever seen a man arrested if he didnt do anything and i almost never see both parties get cuffed if the other party didnt do anything. Admitingly, i see the headline of "spievey charged with domestic violence, child endangerment" and i made an off color comment. Its not my job to figure out the facts and diagnose what happened...im looking at the fact him and his baby mamma got in a fight with his daughter right there and the daughter was hit/pushed whatever. The obvious answer to the problem would be get the child to safety then hit the mom with a bat for putting your daughter in danger :D

But its your job to jump to conclusions? Someone is hitting you, its not always easily to get little girl out of the way. And from the sounds of it the Mom wanted her anyway so putting her down would have been horrible.

As far as being sent to jail on 3 occasions doesn't mean he's guilty for life..
 
But its your job to jump to conclusions? Someone is hitting you, its not always easily to get little girl out of the way. And from the sounds of it the Mom wanted her anyway so putting her down would have been horrible.

As far as being sent to jail on 3 occasions doesn't mean he's guilty for life..

he went to jail for fighting with his baby mamma and endangering his child....i didnt jump to conclusions. Thats what happened.
 
he went to jail for fighting with his baby mamma and endangering his child....i didnt jump to conclusions. Thats what happened.

He was protecting his child, but as been stated several times - both go regardless who's fault it is. That's just the law. You have to look deeper than "Free Press Headline: Spievey/domestic abuse" must be guilty.
 
Back
Top