This is long, but I wanted to address your points.
I like how you tell these stories that, I assume, you somehow think equate with the one I wrote, yet they have no detail to them. You say a couple from your complex, after checking with everyone else they knew, asked if you?d like their junk so they wouldn?t have to pay to take it to the dump. That is supposed to equate?
This would equate: You were the first ones they came to, even though they didn?t know you and you were in a totally different building three blocks from them and they randomly knocked on your door, and they gave you Lane furniture, and Wolfgang Puck cookware, and a handmade Persian rug that your wife and you had previously sat down and specifically listed as the things you wanted.
I really think that your hatred of God doesn?t allow you to see the difference between these stories.
I mean, a pregnant woman talks to the other pregnant woman she?s sharing a room with and she has an extra car seat. How does that equate?
This would equate: Your sister on the way to the hospital to give birth says, ?Oh my gosh! I need a car seat in order to take the baby home. I?d love to have the new Graco Deluxe model.? She gets to the hospital and a stranger walks up and says, ?I bought this car seat, but my wife bought one, too, here you can have it, no charge. It?s a Graco Deluxe model.?
Can you see the difference here?
We prayed specifically for a Tempur-Pedic mattress vs junk that?s not even worth taking to the dump.
Given by someone we never knew.
The mattress was given by a complete stranger, whom I still have never met vs a couple who lived in your building
How it ended up where it did.
It was given to a church that?s still fairly new to us (which also adds another probability to the original bread story. AND Jason and his wife are new to it as well, another probability). We were at our previous church for 14 years. What if we had stayed just a little longer? Or if we had joined one of the 200 different churches in the area when we moved? There?s one on every corner. Or he had given the mattress to one of those other 200 churches? (Just the last two items alone involve a 200 X 200 probability) Vs your neighbor who had already asked everyone else.
I could go on, but it?s obvious these stories are not equal.
What you described is generosity by those folks, which is great to receive. I had a guy come up to me last Sunday morning and say, ?Your daughter just mentioned that you have a car that?s parked because it needs to go to the shop and it will cost $500 to fix it.? I said, ?Yes, that?s true. The family is using one car right now. I?m unemployed so I?m waiting until I find a job.? He said, ?I?d like to write you a check for $500 so you can get it fixed.? I offered to pay him back, but he indicated that he wasn?t doing it to get paid back. This kind of thing is great to have happen. Just like the envelope that was handed to my wife at church several weeks ago that had $400 in it from an anonymous person/couple. Or when the neighbors across the street walked over and handed my wife a wad of 10 $100 bills. These are all great instances of love and generosity. It goes against a man?s pride to have money given to him, but, fortunately, we have been on the giving side more often than the receiving and because of that I understand it is an act of gratitude to the giver to receive it.
So we?re back to the ?When should God intervene?? question.
First of all - How do you know He?s not intervening? Both the church I attended for 14 years and the one I attend now, support ministries that drill wells for those people you mentioned. How do you know that the villages that the wells are dug in are not the ones praying for them? The ones who believe that He exists and are seeking Him?
See, you want Him to intervene in the issues that you deem the worst, but what if He intervened in your friend?s life and told him that he and his girlfriend couldn?t abort the child she is carrying. You?d be outraged and say He has no right to tell them what they can or cannot do. Before you say that?s not true ? how do you talk about the people who are pro-life because they believe God hates when we kill unborn babies? Is that not one of the ways that God could be trying to intervene without bullying His way into their lives?
I disagree with your last assumption. It is perfectly fine to question God. He?s a big boy, He can take it. And we can know His will in these matters by searching after Him. I know it is His will that no one suffers, but He is also bound by His promise to allow us to make our own decisions, and many times those decisions lead to suffering.
There is nothing special about me. I am no better than anyone else. I do, however, follow His leading and direction and He is the one who is special. I told you at the beginning of this thread about this verse ? Hebrews 11:6 ?And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.? Emphasis mine. So why should He reward someone who doesn?t believe He even exists, or, if unsure if He exists, doesn?t seek Him?
He will always keep His promises. He always has with me. As a matter of fact, I will tell you later of a promise He made to me a long time ago (and there have been times I wanted to give up on it), but I know that He is faithful to His word and will keep it in His timing. Then when it happens I?ll tell you that, too.
I appreciate you reading all of this. I appreciate your willingness to discuss these issues.
I'm really trying to figure out how you think your stories are completely impossible and there is absolutely no chance it happened at random and must have been worked by God. Even the situation you said would equate to your story is possible without God. That is what you're not understanding. There are millions of people in this world that have no God whatsoever and have really strange coincidences occur. It doesn't mean that a deity had to intervene.
It's not about me hating God. I don't hate God. I hate the bible. I hate the message that it sends if read properly. Sure, there's some warm and fuzzy stuff, but there's also a ton of stuff that you won't even admit is in it. And for the record, I would love for there to be a God. I just refuse to follow a book (and it's god) that has so many detestable things inside of it.
Again, I don't hate God and my nonbelief in Him is not clouding my vision here. You had something good happen for you, but it's nothing that couldn't actually happen. Here's what would qualify as something I would say would back you up. Your back hurts, you pray for a new mattress, a man comes up to you and hands it to you right then and there. Besides, it didn't even fix your back. You're still having problems. Maybe God could have sent a doctor to your house that has found a miracle surgery to make sure your pain goes away forever? That would be another good example of something I couldn't explain.
People pray for specific things all the time and don't get them, no matter how dire the situation. Is that proof that God doesn't exist since you say that getting what you asked for was proof? It works both ways. And yes, I know that you have a witty church inspired come back for it. Have you noticed how anything that could ever make a christian doubt the existence of God, there's either a punishment or a really really bad excuse?
Okay, on the subject of the when to intervene...First of all, I'm sorry, but why should kids have to pray to a God in order to eat? Why should a woman/girl have to pray to a God in order to not get raped by her uncle/father/brother/neighbor? Why should a man have to pray to a God in order to keep his home?
I don't know if you've noticed, but despite all of the churches all over the world doing their occasional fundraisers and well digging, there are still millions of kids that are dying because of malnutrition and poison water. All God would have to do is give more occasional rain and help things grow at the same time as giving fresh drinking water.
Yes, I know, I know. The famous "When should God step in" question. I get this all the time and I think it's the most ridiculous question you could ever ask. When should he step in? Well, since he's God, if he doesn't like abortion, stop it. It's simple as that. If he doesn't like a man raping a woman, stop it. Sure, it might piss some people off, but who cares? He's God!!!
Believe it or not, I hate abortion, too. I don't want any unborn babies to be aborted! I don't think any pro-choice people think that way. The difference between us is I do not believe in God and His laws don't bind me to some foolish thinking that a woman has to go through a pregnancy and give birth to a baby that she either can't support, has been raped and impregnated, or she could die if she goes full term.
God craves love and respect from us all. I'm sure you wouldn't deny that. Why not give some kind of proof other than some book that has multiple authors, has been revised hundreds of times, and has very few historical facts that can actually be proven? The answer I always get to this question is that God wants us to follow Him with faith and that it's different to KNOW he exists, rather than having faith in Him existing.
That never made much sense to me. I get the concept, but why not just show yourself, lay out your rules, and if we disobey Him, then we can go to Hell. Why let so many religions exist? Show yourself in some way and let people love you or defy you with an actual reason. How can someone be expected to find God when there are so many other religions and no proof that any of the are legit?
God never had a problem talking to His people in the past. You say that he speaks to you, so let me ask you a question. If God told you to kill your neighbor because he is a pedophile, would you do it? And I'm not asking if God would command that of you. Just simply, would you? How would you feel if someone else said they heard God tell them to do such a thing? It happens all the time, yet those people are considered crazy. Why?
Is it such a stretch for a god that commanded childrens' heads to be dashed against the walls, pregnant women cut open, animals to be slaughtered, and women to be taken as slaves, to order one of His children to kill? If you can't accept that God might ask someone to do that, why should anyone accept that God talks to you? Would that not be just as crazy? I mean, I guess this is going back to your OP, but I'd really like your answer on this.
I just feel that you people cover your eyes with a blindfold, stick your fingers in your ears and yell NAH NAH NAH NAH NAH whenever you get to the bad parts of the bible. Or, worse yet, you try to justify them.