Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Rule changes, work stoppage, Offseason changes, Pitch Clock, New Uniforms

WATERCOOLER WEDNESDAY.
Totally Tigers

On Monday, the Detroit Tigers released their new City Connect uniforms. They will be worn during Friday home games, approximately 12 times this year.
City Connect is a brand name of Nike. It is part of a contract Nike signed with MLB to produce “alternate uniforms.” A veiled attempt to try to attract more fans, especially the younger ones. Oh, and to create another revenue stream. Only the Yankees and Athletics have opted out from having these new uniforms.
It will be the first time the Tigers will not be wearing white at home.

These new togs are meant to be fun. To mix it up a little.
The Tigers’ new uniform is a mix of black and dark blue and showing no logos other than the Nike swoosh. The cap says “Detroit” and the jersey shows “Motor City.” The pattern on the jerseys is meant to imitate tire tracks. (Insert your Saturday morning cartoon memories here.)

What fans will not see is the “tiger eyes” picture under the bill of the cap and the numbers/codes showing the area code, year the team was founded and the years of World Series championships. That is, unless you buy a replica.
For a full viewing the new uniform, check this out:
What do you think of their new City Connect uniform?

What do you think of the Tigers new City Connect uniform?

1. Really like it.

2. Better than I thought it would be.

3. Yawn.

4. It's really horrible.

VOTE
 
SATURDAY SURVEY.
Totally Tigers

The Detroit Tigers debuted their new City Connect uniforms last night.
One of the biggest differences is the hat. While still navy blue with white lettering, the Olde English D is nowhere to be found. Instead, “Detroit” in a more modern font can be seen.
See this tweet to look at it more closely. (Click on the link.)

What are the chances that you would wear this hat?
Is it a nice change from the old traditional hat that you may want to mix it up a bit? Would you keep both hats in your rotation?
Is change a good thing?
Or is it sacrilege to wear the new hat?

Will you be wearing the new Detroit Tigers cap?

1. The new hat will become my go-to cap for this year..

2. I'll wear both the old and new hats.

3. Only the Olde English D will touch my head.

VOTE
 
TUESDAY TIDBITS.
Totally Tigers
 
WATERCOOLER WEDNESDAY.
Totally Tigers

The Detroit Tigers recently received their City Connect uniforms. They are supposed to wear them for each Friday night home game only.
The new togs have created some friction with fans. They are black and blue with a tire mark print all over. The jerseys say “Motor City” while the hats say “Detroit.”

The white home uniform tradition is gone (at least on Friday nights) and the Olde English D is missing.
However, the Tigers have started winning games while wearing the new uniforms. They are (through Sunday’s game) 4-1.
This past weekend, the team voted to wear them again on Saturday – and won again. They did the same for Sunday with another win. And for Tuesday’s game, they will once again don the City Connect uniforms.
Today’s poll is a tough one. It involves a deal with the Devil.

If you were promised that the Tigers would play above .500 for the rest of the season while wearing the City Connect uniforms every day – and forsaking the traditional one – would you agree to the deal?
It would mean that the Olde English D would remain in the clubhouse lockers for the rest of the year.

If promised that the Tigers would play above .500 this year, would you agree to them wearing the City Connect uniforms for every game?

1. Yes, sign me up for the City Connect uniforms!

2. No, there are some things that cannot be bought. Keep the Old English D.

VOTE
 
MONDAY MUSINGS.
Totally Tigers

Today, it’s about quick hits – bits of news that catch my radar during the week as well as connecting the dots re ongoing stories. Even the quirky.
So let’s get to it! Here are the most interesting topics that hit my radar over the past week………..
 
Rob Manfred said it is possible that MLB would test the automated strike zone challenge system in spring training in 2025, which could lead to potential implementation in 2026. But it is not a guarantee they will move on that schedule, and he feels the spring test is important.
 
DEEPER DISCUSSIONS.
Totally Tigers

In an effort to improve the game and attract more fans, MLB is rumored to be discussing making yet another change to the game.
Requiring starting pitchers to pitch a minimum of 6 innings per game.
Of course, there are exceptions – injuries, throwing more than 100 pitches and allowing 4+ earned runs.

The goal is multi-purpose: restore the prestige of the starting pitcher, increase game action (fewer pitching changes) and reduce pitching injuries.
As to the latter, it is believed that by making this requirement, pitchers would place an emphasis on command and pitching to contact over throwing excessive heat which is linked to injuries.

This potential change would take numerous years to implement. It would start with a trial run in the minors before moving to the majors. And, of course, it would require teams to revamp their player development process.

It’s a complicated topic and not a one-size-fits-all.
For example, teams with younger pitchers – rookies and those on inning limits – would be impacted. Is this strategy feasible for a young pitcher who is being forced to throw 6 innings every 5 days? A young pitcher who may end up being shut down before the season is over because of this requirement?

Today’s blog addresses this question and allows readers to share their thoughts in more detail. And hopefully, to actively engage with others by responding to their posts and creating back-and-forth discussion threads. The more the merrier!
For this one blog only, you’ve got 6 sentences max to share your thoughts. Of course, you can also respond to other readers.
TT will supply the ammunition. One thought-provoking question. Several options provided. One hard choice to be selected. One vote.

Ready?
Should MLB adopt a new rule requiring starting pitchers to go 6 innings?

1. Yes.

2. No.

VOTE
 
No way this will pass. How about early in the season when starters generally don't go far into games. Or when they want to limit rookie PC or pitchers coming off injury, BP days & a starter is at 96 pitches after 5, is he suppose to out in the 6th to get 4 pitches to reach a 100? Dumbest potential rule ever.
 
Back
Top