Shea Patterson is returning for senior season

[hungry]

Open up the starting QB spot for competition again this spring. I'm all for it.

 

[hungry]

Maybe McCaffrey will win the spot. I doubt that McCaffery will, though...I hope McCaffrey stays, but I hope McCaffery transfers...

 

[biggunsbob]

Bob

The guy's name is McCaffrey not McCaffery

Whatever it is the spell check that always changes it. I don’t care he would have won the same amount of games as Patterson this year. I really could care less how his name is spelled as long as he wins some games, and or beats out Patterson for the starting spot.
Heck I bet Milton would have won 8 or 9 games .

Why is it Jim always has to go out and get transfer Qb ? I guess he doesn’t trust his recruiting. Heck develop a kid and let him take over as a sophomore. I watched the highlights of that Clemson freshmen. Why not give the young guys a shot?

 

[josh200612]

No way Shea is the starter next year.

 

[tinselwolverine]

Whatever it is the spell check that always changes it. I don’t care he would have won the same amount of games as Patterson this year. I really could care less how his name is spelled as long as he wins some games, and or beats out Patterson for the starting spot.

If his name were spelled “McCaffery” our guys probably would’ve beaten Notre Dame and Ohio State and made the playoffs.

But it isn’t. It’s spelled “McCaffrey.”

Nothing would have changed, except our guys likely wouldn’t have come back against Northwestern the way they did.

 

[hungry]

McCaffrey would've gotten hurt 4 games into the season and then Shea would've taken over anyway

EVEN IF he stays healthy and Michigan only wins 8 or 9 games instead of 10, Michigan fans would be crying and yelling and screaming all over the place just like they are now.

 

[biggunsbob]

If his name were spelled ?McCaffery? our guys probably would?ve beaten Notre Dame and Ohio State and made the playoffs.

But it isn?t. It?s spelled ?McCaffrey.?

Nothing would have changed, except our guys likely wouldn?t have come back against Northwestern the way they did.

So your saying 9-4 With a young qb playing is the same as 10-3 and finishing like we did losing at the end of the season like we always do. What the heck is the difference? We still lost our last two games again.
How do you know McCaffrey would not have brought the team back ? He is a faster runner then Patterson. You just don?t know. All I am saying is let a kid develop while he is young maybe instead of always trying to get a transfer kid. Patterson was a upgrade over the year before I guess because we did go from 8 to 10 wins. We will never know how the team would have played under Milton or Dylan.

I do agree with you . Open it up Qb competition in spring. Hopefully without Hamilton.

 

[tinselwolverine]

So your saying 9-4 With a young qb playing is the same as 10-3 and finishing like we did losing at the end of the season like we always do. What the heck is the difference? We still lost our last two games again.
How do you know McCaffrey would not have brought the team back ? He is a faster runner then Patterson. You just don?t know. All I am saying is let a kid develop while he is young maybe instead of always trying to get a transfer kid. Patterson was a upgrade over the year before I guess because we did go from 8 to 10 wins. We will never know how the team would have played under Milton or Dylan.

I do agree with you . Open it up Qb competition in spring. Hopefully without Hamilton.

McCaffery would have brought the team back, And also with McCaffery Michigan would have won the national championship.

But we don?t have McCaffery. We have McCaffrey.

Makes all the difference in the world. Close, but no cigar.

 

[Spartanmack]

If his name were spelled ?McCaffery? our guys probably would?ve beaten Notre Dame and Ohio State and made the playoffs.

But it isn?t. It?s spelled ?McCaffrey.?

Nothing would have changed, except our guys likely wouldn?t have come back against Northwestern the way they did.

McCaffery would have brought the team back, And also with McCaffery Michigan would have won the national championship.

But we don?t have McCaffery. We have McCaffrey.

Makes all the difference in the world. Close, but no cigar.

I love reading these posts and picturing a few empty Mickey's grenades and one half empty (or is it half full? I always forget) on the desk or a side table near your computer as you type away. Keep 'em coming.