1. There's no evidence that anything improper was done by anyone other than Stallions, yet you state that there is as if it's indisputable fact. That's a lie. As a matter of fact, the only information that has been released is that the NCAA's investigation turned up nothing connecting Jim to what Stallions was doing. The exact opposite of what you're claiming to be the case.
I said no such thing, this is a flat out lie. I said there's plenty of evidence to warrant an investigation and if that investigation turns up violations as head coach Harbaugh bears responsibility for that regardless of whether or not he knew or was involved. The buck stops with him, compliance is on him. If he's going to talk about other programs and be critical of their culture, he better run a really tight ship and he and uofm fans need to be prepared to be criticized when they f up. Good try though.
2. You say "wait for the facts to come out" when it's Mel Tucker jerking off in a hotel room but as soon as the first unsubstantiated report comes out Jim is running a dirty program.
Again, another lie. I said I believe Mel Tucker that it was consensual but even if it is, he should still be fired because carrying on that way to me is a fireable offense. I said this before the investigation was complete but only because Tucker's confession was enough for me. I did say we'd have to wait for the investigation to see who was telling the truth and even then we may never know but that wouldn't change my mind about firing Tucker for cause. As for Harbaugh and this incident, see my response to your first lie above. Again, good try.
3. I never said that it didn't go against "the spirit" of the rule. And even though it does go against the "spirit" it does not violate the actual rules. That's been very well explained multiple times and even though it hurts your feelings that doesn't make it any less true.
Never said you didn't say it violated the spirit of the rule - that's 3 for 3 on lies about what I said. And you couldn't possibly offend me so don't worry, my 'feelings' are just fine. But violating the spirit of the rule is violating the rule as far as I'm concerned. And I think paying nonstaffers is no different than sending a staffer and giving nonstaffers tickets is compensation so I'm not convinced they've only violated the spirit of the rule. That's my opinion - I stand by it and make no apologies for it.
4. You're either too stupid to understand what I was saying or you're not even bothering to try because you're so eager to be an insufferable cunt at every opportunity. When I said you're failing to acknowledge, the point was Michigan releasing the information about other teams was to a) setup the grounds for a lawsuit and b) to counter the claims by morons like you that this somehow provided them a competitive advantage.
Don't flatter yourself, you're not very difficult to figure out - you're almost as obvious and simple as MC. I haven't said any of the things you've accused me of saying - perhaps it's you who is so eager to play the victim and pretend it's uofm against the world. It's why you and the handful of other crybaby hypocrite wolverine fans here are so annoying.
And so what? I don't have to acknowledge every instance of a rule violation to comment on any other. The fact that stuff is coming out about other programs isn't an exoneration of what uofm is accused of doing. And if you think it doesn't give a team a competitive advantage, then you're definitely a moron. Why do you think teams do it?
5. Nobody said it's not a violation of the rules, but it's not creating an unlevel playing field like all the whiney-ass coaches, ADs and fans are claiming that it does. They're not all losing by 30+ because some superfan is good at charades, they're winning by 30+ because they have 35 NFL players on their roster and the rest of the conference, save for OSU, doesn't have 20 combined. You can call it cheating all you want but it's dishonest to imply that it provided any meaningful advantage and utterly ridiculous that coaches from other programs are complaining about it when they're doing it themselves.
You don't know that it's not creating a uneven playing field. Just because most teams do it, doesn't mean some aren't better at it than others particularly if some are going to far greater, potentially illegal lengths to do it. A determination of whether or not a rule was broken doesn't hinge on whether or not it led to your success. To say "they do it too so we're even or innocent" or "we would have beat them by the same score anyway" is just stupid and shows a complete disregard for the rules, not to mention a total lack of class and character - like your football team.
