Not making a judgement, it's my opinion. He's a third rotation guy. He's not worth 20 million dollars a year for what he has produced at this point in his career.
He is who he is. Doesn't have dominant stuff, pitches to contact, needs a great defense behind him. I'm not a baseball stat guy, never have pretended to be. People get lost in sabermetrics and go way overboard instead of just watching what is in front of their face.
In the six seasons I saw with him in a Tiger uniform, not once did it cross my mind that this guy is deserving of 20 million a year. It's just how I feel.
We mock what we don't understand.
He doesn't need a great defense. He just cannot have the worst defense. Give him an average defense and we aren't even having this discussion.
Sabermetrics is a study of historical baseball stats and how they can be predictive in nature. It isn't an exact science, but it is more reliable than the "eye test", because it cannot be "fooled". It is objective in nature, not subjective.
You have three sports columns, from three different sources citing how this was a good deal for the Red Sox. Too many people think an effective MLB starter has to have overpowering stuff. That is not the case. In fact, the "over powering" starters tend to be prone to injuries. Give me a pitcher who can pitch, versus one that throws any day of the week.
And for the record....Porcello has had bad luck (more than any other DET Starter) with relievers allowing inherited runners to score.
Case in point. In his 4 starts in BOS, Porcello left the games with 5 runners on base in those 4 games. All 5 runners were allowed to score. A league average bullpen only allows 29%, or 1.45 runs. Big difference in 4 games. Compound that over a career, and that is huge.
Having a league average defense and league average bullpen will be a bonus.