Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

The Official MICHIGAN vs ARMY Score Prediction Thread

TheVictors

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Messages
14,206
Well what do you expect in Week 1 ?.? Always going to be some funny bounces and dropped passes and MICHIGAN had its share last Saturday hosting Middle Tennessee State. An entirely new Speed in Space offense was unloaded at Michigan Stadium, showing a mixed bag of results ? some very big results mixed with some sloppiness.

And congratulations to Mitchrapp who was very, very close with his Week 1 score prediction. Well?on to ARMY.

The thing about playing the academies is that you?re facing ?football players? who view the Oklahoma Drill as a relief when compared to some aspects of their basic training and a fight till the death mentality. Having withstood two recent attacks from Air Force, a 6pt Hoke nail biter in 2012 and a more comfortable win under Harbaugh in 2017 and the Wolverines should know what to expect when ARMY rolls in.

Both teams enter the game with (1-0) records following the win in Ann Arbor last Saturday night while ARMY steamed Rice, 14-7. While the new Gattis Offense had its mistakes, it also showed flashes and while Army prides itself on ball control and keeping the ball away from opposing offenses, the Black Knights managed 284 total yards vs the Owls while UM put up 453 total on the Blue Knights. With the new emphasis on ?bigger plays,? MICHIGAN may not to have dominate in time of possession if Shea, Tarik Black, Nico Collins and Zach Charbonnet can make big plays again.

For what it?s worth, Rice is also a C-USA program and not predicted to do nearly as well as MTSU has been and they almost had ARMY, until the end.

Vegas sure likes the Home Wolverines with the Maize and Blue entering the game as 22-23 point FAVORITES and an Over/Under of 47 total points.

Something tells me Vegas thinks Army?s ball control might keep the scoring down and the spread from getting out of hand.

So go ahead and post your predictions with some supportive analysis if you wish, but keep the woofing and barking for other threads.

Toe meets leather this Saturday in Ann Arbor at 12 Noon and ?THAT?S A FACT, JACK!!!

DilemKPWkAAC_jQ
 
Last edited:
I like the Stripes reference.

Michigan... 35
Army.........06
 
I'm going to jump in on this one early ...

I think the Gattis offense was like watching someone chug a case of beer and puke all over the place. So much stuff!!

Army will slow the pace of play when it can but I think the kinks from Week 1 will have been resolved so make mine,

MICHIGAN - 45
ARMY - 10

Mrs Vic says,

MICHIGAN - 28
ARMY - 10

Little Vic says,

MICHIGAN - 31
ARMY - 17
 
Last edited:
It took Army 56 minutes to score 14 points against Rice. I think our defense is capable of at least replicating the efforts of might Rice. Hell, we might even be better than them. I just do not believe a team who doesn't pass will have much success against Brown's defense. Army's secondary can't hold up against our passing attack either. If we can get some stops early, we can get up 21-0 pretty easily and that is game over. Army can't come back from being down 21.

Michigan - 42
Army - 10

GO BLUE!
 
It took Army 56 minutes to score 14 points against Rice. I think our defense is capable of at least replicating the efforts of might Rice. Hell, we might even be better than them. I just do not believe a team who doesn't pass will have much success against Brown's defense. Army's secondary can't hold up against our passing attack either. If we can get some stops early, we can get up 21-0 pretty easily and that is game over. Army can't come back from being down 21.

Michigan - 42
Army - 10

GO BLUE!

You?re probably correct, but until Harbaugh turns a major corner I?m not a believer anymore. Lost faith in him. He looks more dazed and confused than he ever has. His eyes tell the story. He looks clueless.
 
He switched to contacts...

I know, I know, no woofing, sorry
 
It took Army 56 minutes to score 14 points against Rice. I think our defense is capable of at least replicating the efforts of might Rice. Hell, we might even be better than them. I just do not believe a team who doesn't pass will have much success against Brown's defense. Army's secondary can't hold up against our passing attack either. If we can get some stops early, we can get up 21-0 pretty easily and that is game over. Army can't come back from being down 21.

Michigan - 42
Army - 10

GO BLUE!

I read the mogblog analysis of Army-Rice, (I know, I know...) and they noted that most of Army?s running plays only go for a couple yards, and their schtick seems to be slowly moving the ball along, at 3 yards/rush.

so if they are held to no gain, or a loss on any given down, they pretty much have to punt.

they only throw a handful of passes, and their passing game is hilariously bad, relying completely on the element of surprise.

should not be hard to contain them, unless we play really stupid, and do dumb things.

You?re probably correct, but until Harbaugh turns a major corner I?m not a believer anymore. Lost faith in him. He looks more dazed and confused than he ever has. His eyes tell the story. He looks clueless.

I haven?t really listened to him directly myself in a while, and everything I have heard/read is filtered through sports media first, but I never got that impression; I think he?s just quieted down a lot, and turned off the blaring ?Harbaugh hype machine? he came in with.

tough to keep that going when you?re 0-4 against OSU.

he?s always said weird stuff though.
 
You?re probably correct, but until Harbaugh turns a major corner I?m not a believer anymore. Lost faith in him. He looks more dazed and confused than he ever has. His eyes tell the story. He looks clueless.

He doesn't have to turn a major corner for us to beat Army. Teams like Army have never been the issue.
 
31-10 Michigan. If it wasn't for the fact that I fully expect Michigan to be limited on possessions I would go higher. I hate the triple option. Army had an 18 play 96 yard TD drive last week that took over 9 minutes off of the clock. So boring.
 
So this is probably a dumb question...

When did all the service academies decide that they can only run the triple option? Why can't they just do regular, normal stuff? I know most of the guys can't match up to the big boys, but you can still do unique formations without having to go triple option, wishbone. Why not adapt a spread style like a lot of MAC schools do? Teams that are worse than the service academies rarely run the triple option.
 
Last edited:
So this is probably a dumb question...

When did all the service academies decide that they can only run the triple option? Why can't they just do regular, normal stuff? I know most of the guys can't match up to the big boys, but you can still do unique formations without having to go triple option, wishbone. Why not adapt a spread style like a lot of MAC schools do? Teams that are worse than the service academies rarely run the triple option.

It's a good offense to suit the players they can recruit. IMO. The SC's not going to attract pocket passers or 5-star skill guys. So it's a simple offense that is repeatable and read-dependent. And teams don't see it very often.
 
So this is probably a dumb question...

When did all the service academies decide that they can only run the triple option? Why can't they just do regular, normal stuff? I know most of the guys can't match up to the big boys, but you can still do unique formations without having to go triple option, wishbone. Why not adapt a spread style like a lot of MAC schools do? Teams that are worse than the service academies rarely run the triple option.

They cannot recruit/compete with the football factory type schools for NFL prospects. So they're not going to get a lot of the same athletes that can sling the ball all over the field. They also probably have offensive lineman who can actually run and aren't 350 lb masses of human lard. I think the numbers show the offense actually works decently well these days, because other teams aren't used to preparing/defending it. Hence why some Michigan fans are nervous about tomorrow.

Part of it may be tradition/toughness/discipline type reasons as well I'm guessing.
 
It's a good offense to suit the players they can recruit. IMO. The SC's not going to attract pocket passers or 5-star skill guys. So it's a simple offense that is repeatable and read-dependent. And teams don't see it very often.

Beat me to the punch with a lot of that :)
 
Back
Top