Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

The Unofficial Official Purdue vs Michigan thread

Denard needs to be open minded. He seems to decided who is getting the ball before the snap. Poor choices are killing him. If that is true he throws a pick every 14 passes, that is a shitty stat
 
Dropped 8 back and made him throw. Hindsight wishes we would ran it.
 
Before this game every 11.6 attempts Denard averages a pick!

Not a D 1 stat you want to see
 
sggatecl said:
Dropped 8 back and made him throw. Hindsight wishes we would ran it.

Devils advocate. Therein lies the problem with his increased passing confidence. Less likely to tuck it and run.
 
jesndave said:
[color=#551A8B said:
Danny Diggler[/color]]

I like you're spirit so I'll give you a break.
tongue.png

Yeah yeah, I can't spell
tongue.png
Thanks for the break. Haha

I'm no grammar nazi. The gimmick offense doesn't do it for me. A waste of a dive or an off tackle run for at least 3 positive yards. I suppose the pay off is greater with a package like it, so I should probably bite my tongue..
 
doinwork83 said:
sggatecl said:
Dropped 8 back and made him throw. Hindsight wishes we would ran it.

Devils advocate. Therein lies the problem with his increased passing confidence. Less likely to tuck it and run.

He had Hemmingway wide open on the out side, just has to see the field and not telegraph his passes
 
[color=#551A8B said:
Danny Diggler[/color]]Note to Borges.. RUN THE BALL!!!!!!!!!!! NOTHING TOO FANCY!

The pass that was an INT wasn't fancy. about as simple as you can get.
 
[color=#551A8B said:
Danny Diggler[/color]]
jesndave said:
Yeah yeah, I can't spell
tongue.png
Thanks for the break. Haha

I'm no grammar nazi. The gimmick offense doesn't do it for me. A waste of a dive or an off tackle run for at least 3 positive yards. I suppose the pay off is greater with a package like it, so I should probably bite my tongue..

Yeah, I wasn't so sure of it at first but it's growing on me.
 
[color=#FF6103 said:
Monster [/color]]
[quote="Danny Diggler":7xu8vsqp]Note to Borges.. RUN THE BALL!!!!!!!!!!! NOTHING TOO FANCY!

The pass that was an INT wasn't fancy. about as simple as you can get. [/quote:7xu8vsqp]


What i was getting at was running the ball is a gain of at least 3-4. Passing this much when you could run all over this team is getting fancy. Shit..... I'm stuck in Carr days..
 
Back
Top