spockmaster
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 8,691
Don't we still have Hanrahan coming up?
Maybe eventually. He still hasnt faced any live hitting yet.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedDon't we still have Hanrahan coming up?
Don't we still have Hanrahan coming up?
Maybe eventually. He still hasnt faced any live hitting yet.
It is rare that I disagree with everything somebody posts. That's why I enjoy messageboards. We have little chance of agreeing but I'll summarize why I think completely differently than you.
Getting a 60-70 IP guy that you trust in the 7th inning of the ALCS isn't nearly as easy as you are making it sound. I'm guessing you've watched the playoffs the last few years. Every year teams make trades for impact relievers. My anger is that DD hasn't gotten a big enough reliever going in to the playoffs.
I don't understand why you would complicate a trade now trying to get a 200 IP starter. They are easier to get in the offseason (James Shields?). They don't need that guy today so you would be giving up prospects needlessly more than getting a top-end reliever from a team that knows a closer won't get them to the playoffs. Great starters often don't make it out of the seventh in the playoffs. I want four closer caliber guys to take over from there. The games are lost in the 8th just like the 3rd.
It's like not having a good kicker "We can get one anywhere..." until you find out the guys hwho are clutch are rare. You lose games and opportunities while you learn that lesson. Tigers need one more marquee reliever to make me happy for the postseason.
10 man pitching staff.
The 5 starters with Porcello and Smyly likely in the pen.
Al Al
Coke
Joba
Nathan
?????
I'll believe it when I see it. My expectations are as low as than can be with him at the moment.
Imo, RP should be add on players in a trade not the main piece.
Right but that guy is arguing we need to trade for a marquee reliever, which I disagree with (but what else is new) because we supposedly have Hanrahan coming some time in the second half.
Porcello isn't going to the pen.
Don't we still have Hanrahan coming up?
I think most agree.
Not if the RHB taking his place is hitting at .900+ OPS. All I'm saying is I wouldn't say we need a lefty in our rotation. Maybe you don't either but some do..
I think most agree.
The Angels do not agree along with me. "Most" is becoming smaller.
Depends on if you believe they did the right thing..I don't.
So where does this leave us? I actually think it might help that LAA were the first to pull the trigger. Less competition to bid with when we make our move.
What do you guys think it would take to land Benoit/Seth Smith?
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!