Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Trump's communications director quits

what does that have to do with you completely missing Tinsel's joke?


Originally Posted by tinselwolverine View Post
When all is said and done, where do you think this president and his political party will rank historically?

"great question - can't wait for the answer. Easily post of the week."

Great joke? Can't wait for what then? Punchline? Easily joke of the week? It was two questions, not one.


Read straightforward to me, and it was in reply. It is no secret or joke what you have posted about him previously and personally. We're supposed to know when he is serious or not by text? Most people use an emoticon when online.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by tinselwolverine View Post
When all is said and done, where do you think this president and his political party will rank historically?

"great question - can't wait for the answer. Easily post of the week."

Great joke? Can't wait for what then? Easily joke of the week? It was two questions, not one.


Read straightforward to me, and it was in reply. It is no secret or joke what you have posted about him previously and personally. We're supposed to know when he is serious or not by text? Most people use an emoticon.

Okay...we all now where Bob thinks Trump will rank as a president and where the current GOP will rank as a party.

Trump will go down as the worst president in history, and the GOP will go down as the most corrupt party of all time.

Bob has posted that more than once.

He's actually posted it two posts in a row more than once.

So, yeah, it was a little good natured tongue in cheek humor.
 
Last edited:
the new Forbes list just came out and according to them, Jeff Bezos is the richest person in the world with a net worth of $112B.

According to some here he shouldn't be allowed to be that rich. He should disperse it to the rest of the US population...Each person would get about $350.

Hmm...and who might that some here be?

I don't recall reading a single post from anyone stating that the ultra-wealthy should be forced to give up every dime that they have and give it to the rest of the US population.

Do you believe that everyone who is rich, except for those who are self-made millionaires or billionaires, deserve to be wealthy by birth or by inheritance, while not having earned any of it?
 
Hmm...and who might that some here be?

I don't recall reading a single post from anyone stating that the ultra-wealthy should be forced to give up every dime that they have and give it to the rest of the US population.

Do you believe that everyone who is rich, except for those who are self-made millionaires or billionaires, deserve to be wealthy by birth or by inheritance, while not having earned any of it?

yes....the wealth was already taxed at an extremely high rate. Why should it be taxed again?

Let's say I win the next Powerball. The cash option is $207.4M. I would pay over $86M in taxes. Even though I didn't earn that money it was already heavily taxed. Why should my heirs have to pay taxes on what I have left when I die?
 
yes....the wealth was already taxed at an extremely high rate. Why should it be taxed again?

Let's say I win the next Powerball. The cash option is $207.4M. I would pay over $86M in taxes. Even though I didn't earn that money it was already heavily taxed. Why should my heirs have to pay taxes on what I have left when I die?

How many people win a big lottery hit out of the entire US population?

.0001%?

They didn't earn any of it, and their kids didn't win or earn any of it.

If a much, much higher percentage of the US population is born into poverty or are poor, then why aren't they entitled to any money that they didn't earn or win?
 
yes....the wealth was already taxed at an extremely high rate. Why should it be taxed again?

Let's say I win the next Powerball. The cash option is $207.4M. I would pay over $86M in taxes. Even though I didn't earn that money it was already heavily taxed. Why should my heirs have to pay taxes on what I have left when I die?

you should buy your powerball tickets in NJ where there is no state income tax on lottery winnings. Don't drive here today though, we're getting hammered by a massive snow storm and the roads are very dangerous.
 
Originally Posted by tinselwolverine View Post
When all is said and done, where do you think this president and his political party will rank historically?

"great question - can't wait for the answer. Easily post of the week."

Great joke? Can't wait for what then? Punchline? Easily joke of the week? It was two questions, not one.


Read straightforward to me, and it was in reply. It is no secret or joke what you have posted about him previously and personally. We're supposed to know when he is serious or not by text? Most people use an emoticon.

not "we", you - most people I'm sure got it. yes you should have known. In this instance it was painfully obvious.
 
Last edited:
Okay...we all now where Bob thinks Trump will rank as a president and where the current GOP will rank as a party.

Trump will go down as the worst president in history, and the GOP will go down as the most corrupt party of all time.

Bob has posted that more than once.

He's actually posted it two posts in a row more than once.

So, yeah, it was a little good natured tongue in cheek humor.

you left out "and it's not even close" he usually says something like "Trump will go down as the worst president of all time and the GOP is the most corrupt party we have ever seen and it's not even close and you know it." and if it's addressed to me he usually starts or finishes by identifying me as "Hack"
 
Last edited:
now "we", you - most people I'm sure got it. yes you should have known. In this instance it was painfully obvious.

Yeah, sure it was, it was just another reach by you in an attempt to be "right" about everything. And "most people"? There are not enough people posting on this forum, to even make up one complete bowling team.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, sure it was, it was just another reach by you in an attempt to be "right" about everything. And "most people"? There are not enough people posting on this forum, to even make up one complete bowling team.

I don't know how big a bowling team is but all you need to say "most" is two out of three. I don't need to be right about everything, but I'm definitely right about this. you missed an obvious joke, it's not the end of the world. But rather than admit it, you're digging yourself deeper and deeper to try to make me look like the bad guy, once again. you should quit while you're behind, you're only making yourself look dumber.
 
Last edited:
How many people win a big lottery hit out of the entire US population?

.0001%?

They didn't earn any of it, and their kids didn't win or earn any of it.

If a much, much higher percentage of the US population is born into poverty or are poor, then why aren't they entitled to any money that they didn't earn or win?

I was using the lottery as an example of how much a wealthy person pays in taxes.

Why should a poor person be entitled to anything? There is one thing they can do...get a fucking job and quit having kids.
 
I don't know how big a bowling team is but all you need to say "most" is two out of three. I don't need to be right about everything, but I'm definitely right about this. you missed an obvious joke, it's not the end of the world. But rather than admit it, you're digging yourself deeper and deeper to try to make me look like the bad guy, once again. you should quit while you're behind, you're only making yourself look dumber.

Sorry, but you're one of the last members of this site, who could make me quit by posting that I am looking "dumber". And I won't stoop to your level of being a forum troll, no matter how much you might try. to drag me down to it.
 
I was using the lottery as an example of how much a wealthy person pays in taxes.

Why should a poor person be entitled to anything? There is one thing they can do...get a fucking job and quit having kids.

You are aware that many of those who are on welfare, once had good paying jobs that became eliminated, outsourced or offshored by those same permanent tax-cuts receiving corporations? And who had their kids while still being fully employed? I know several neighboring one or two parent families who live like that, and each one would prefer to earn a living FT wage, rather than 2 PT @ or near minimum wage.

Donald Trump won my county by 50,000 votes, and those who voted for him did so b/c they want their promised good-paying FT jobs to appear. I have a feeling that they are gonna be BIGLY upset and very disappointed.
 
Last edited:
You are aware that many of those who are on welfare, once had good paying jobs that became eliminated, outsourced or offshored by those same permanent tax-cuts receiving corporations? And who had their kids while still being fully employed? I know several neighboring one or two parent families who live like that, and each one would prefer to earn a living FT wage, rather than 2 PT @ or near minimum wage.

sure...there are some that fall into that category. But my guess is the people that are in that group are a very small percentage of poor people.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but you're one of the last members of this site, who could make me quit by posting that I am looking "dumber". And I won't stoop to your level of being a forum troll, no matter how much you might try. to drag me down to it.

you just can't admit that you made a mistake and you have to continue to argue with me about how your mistake is somehow my fault. sad.

here's a clever gif i found that perfectly describes you. you may not have seen it before because only a troll would post something like this and you would never stoop to that level...

WTDnnwE.gif
 
That's just beating a dead horse..like trying to have the last post in is trolling.

That thread died soon afterward, so the .gif was quite accurate.

Out of those who post at least fairly often in this forum, the amounts of whom identify as being left-neutral-right are pretty equally distributed.
 
Last edited:
sure...there are some that fall into that category. But my guess is the people that are in that group are a very small percentage of poor people.

Its more involved and disparate than my one example. I prefer to guess that the amount of people who have or are abusing the welfare system are relatively small in percentile, but it seems that there are many who would deprive all for their laziness and irresponsibility.
 
Its more involved and disparate than my one example. I prefer to guess that the amount of people who have or are abusing the welfare system are relatively small in percentile, but it seems that there are many who would deprive all for their laziness and irresponsibility.

I'm not just talking about people on welfare. I'm talking about poor people in general. There are too many that don't work hard, don't get educated or pursue a marketable skill. Too many that have children when they can't afford to raise them. Too many that don't raise their kids right and make sure they don't fall into the same cycle. I think there are millions of poor people that are poor because they are too lazy to change their situation.
 
Last edited:
I was using the lottery as an example of how much a wealthy person pays in taxes.

Why should a poor person be entitled to anything? There is one thing they can do...get a fucking job and quit having kids.

Or they can just keep playing the lottery until they win.

Odds are if they keep playing they'll eventually win.

It may take 150,000 years, but what is that in a lifetime of being wealthy?
 
I'm not just talking about people on welfare. I'm talking about poor people in general. There are too many that don't work hard, don't get educated or pursue a marketable skill. Too many that have children when they can't afford to raise them. Too many that don't raise their kids right and make sure they don't fall into the same cycle. I think there are millions of poor people that are poor because they are too lazy to change their situation.

Oh come on...there are millions of people whose acquired skilset(s), specialized education, and training were wiped out by outsourcing, offshoring, technological advancements, and automation/robotics. Some were even the result of wage/age discrimination, as well as cheaper H1B labor. I have read accounts of pink-slipped white collar workers whose replacements had to be trained physically/virtually, else were threatened with losing their severance packages.

Many US-based businesses have been the recipients of awards and recognition for their successes in outsourcing or "globalizing" their IT departments by their corporate peers, as well as foreign-based businesses who specialize in assisting with outsourcing/offshoring blue and white collar labor.

Those who have managed to pay off their earlier student loans, and who can afford the increasing costs of retraining or acquiring new skills or "reeducation" tend to be older and less desirable b/c of their increased use of health insurance and shorter paths to retirement bennies.

I chose to delay getting married, and have had no children, b/c I recognized the 80s for what they were....a yearly preview to the Randian 21st century of corporate capitalist greed, Republican arrogance, and Oligarch avarice. You were still in high school for the first half, and eventually joined the USAF, or from what I have gathered from your previous posts.

When I finally did marry @ almost 44, one of the first things that we were told during the obligatory half-day of premaritial prep, was that ~50% of all US marriages end in divorce. No way was I going to risk becoming yet another child-support statistic with those shitty odds, much less be able to afford supporting two separate living arrangements AND the costs of further schooling/retraining...although in our case, we have beaten them for almost 20 years....so far.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top