Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Vs Purdue

You realize that he's marked by several defenders on that play. If he runs right to that spot on the snap so do the defenders marked on him. Once it's clear Chiles has the ball the other defenders push in to the pile and so does Carter. It's just such a weird take
This is a weird take - Carter half-assed it to throw off the defense. OK. He barely touched the pile and fell over. He was completely useless on that play even as a decoy.

Carter is a mediocre TB at best and he made absolutely no difference on getting that first down.
 
This is pointless. I'm not gonna keep arguing with the OG Lewerke stan
 
What's a "stan?"

Yeah, if you can't admit something this obvious, then it's completely pointless. You're even resorting to trying to bring up the Lewerke argument AGAIN as if that's some kind of mic drop point.

But since you bring it up. your CDS is at least as bad as your LDS. The first 11 posts are all yours and 8 of them were complaints about Chiles. It wasn't until you got upset that I said something critical of someone not named Chiles that that ratio changed.
 
Last edited:
What's a "stan?"

Yeah, if you can't admit something this obvious, then it's completely pointless. You're even resorting to trying to bring up the Lewerke argument AGAIN as if that's some kind of mic drop point.

But since you bring it up. your CDS is at least as bad as your LDS. The first 11 posts are all yours and 8 of them were complaints about Chiles. It wasn't until you got upset that I said something critical of someone not named Chiles that that ratio changed.
Stan is a slang term for an extremely devoted fan. Maybe if you didn't spend all day, every day arguing with strangers on message boards it would open up more time to engage with people in real life and you'd be able to catch up on new slang terms.
 
I know you'll never stop this senseless argument so I'll make it easy. I'm out
 
Stan is a slang term for an extremely devoted fan. Maybe if you didn't spend all day, every day arguing with strangers on message boards it would open up more time to engage with people in real life and you'd be able to catch up on new slang terms.
I have three very active kids and am involved in multiple business and social networks and ministries through our church. I get around plenty and am happy to not know modern slang terms. Especially those that don’t apply to me.

Like I said before, probably better for you to just take the L on this Carter thing. Maybe that’s what you’re doing by resorting to personal attacks.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top