Michchamp
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 34,212
that's nonsense. Innocent people pay settlements all the time. Or their insurers do on their behalf. Watson paid his accusers peanuts to go away.well, there wasn't enough evidence to charge Bauer either. Watson paid off all of his victims...an innocent man doesn't do that.
totally understandable here, given the media attention their attorney was courting, and the press' willingness to oblige him with headlines (at least here in Houston). It was ridiculous.
From what I read, the opinion underlining this suspension found no evidence he sexually assaulted any masseuses, BTW. At worst, he "should have known" his advances might be unwanted, or something like that (the judge had to bend over backwards to get to that). If "unwanted sexual advances" are a crime, every single man on this planet - married or unmarried - is a criminal...lol
And Albert Breer commented that the initially NFL wanted the suspension to include the Browns-Texans game (the Browns' 12th of the season), and had been pushing for that. so that indicates this had more to do with punishing Watson at the behest of their scumbag owners, than anything he did.
I hope the Browns win the Super Bowl with him this year. Fuck the NFL & their owners... and normally the Browns' sleazy owners too, although, I'll make an exception for them in this case. :cheers: