- Thread Author
- #1
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedTime to get to work!!!
Great news! We'll definitely need him if we're going to pressure the QB
From what I'm reading in other threads, though, a lot of people think that pressuring the QB means nothing.
It's better than nothing.
But because the QB rating is awful high against us when all you get is a pressure. So it's not as easy as saying 'people say pressures are pointless'
We need sacks, we want sacks..and pressures by themselves would be fine if our secondary knew how to cover and INT a pass.
Now maybe a pressure is more effective with another team, Seattle for example.
We need to cause turnovers and our pressures alone aren't causing enough.
We had 15 picks. And we had plenty of forced fumbles, we were just unlucky to recover onlly 7.
From what I'm reading in other threads, though, a lot of people think that pressuring the QB means nothing.
Take out Levy not so much. He had a good year. But the problem, our secondary..it needs to do better covering during these pressures. That's why for us, we need sacks. Because I don't trust the secondary to be able to cover.
They did cover. But they gave up some big plays when coverage broke down on the rare occasions.
3 80 yards, a 60 yarder and 50 yarder puts you in the top 11 if you avoid those 5 big plays next year. Detroit can easily do that with the changes they have made.
You should take a reading comprehension test then. It was made abundantly clear by people that when the pressure doesn't lead to sacks that it isn't enough. Nobody claimed "pressuring the QB means nothing".
Who?
Look in a mirror.
Unless it's a minute later I don't edit post..and my edited are spelling mistakes. You have no proof because I don't do that..
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!