Ziggy's off PUP

[Mitchrapp]

I just proved the Lions did well in pass coverage when they pressure the QB.

46% 5 TDs and 7 ints. You lose Mitch. Your assumption was dumb.

What's the high low and average. 46% doesn't seem good when you said most QB are under 50%.

 

[Mitchrapp]

SO you didn't write Detroit pressures don't mean shit?

Did I edit..no. So what's your point..yeah that's what I thought.

 

[detrisin]

Did I edit..no. So what's your point..yeah that's what I thought.

You're not following the logic train and I don't want to take the time to spell it out for you.

 

[LKP]

What's the high low and average. 46% doesn't seem good when you said most QB are under 50%.

There were 15 of 27 QBs last year that qualified (50% of dropbacks) above 47.7% against pressure.

46% is good by Detroit's defense. It's a huge reason they were best on 3rd down and 12th in completion % against.

Detroit gave up 24 passing TDs (13th in league). 19 were with no pressure, 5 were with pressure.

And then you throw in the 34 turnovers by the offense which screws the D.

Detroit's secondary and entire defense is very underrated.

 

[Mitchrapp]

You're not following the logic train and I don't want to take the time to spell it out for you.

You have no logic. You said I edit a post and were wrong. Posting one thing in one place and in another thread clarifying is different. I once said I didn't like Bell, a year later I said I did like Bell. Opinions change, or need to be resaid.

But your accusation had no logic and you were wrong.

 

[detrisin]

You have no logic. You said I edit a post and were wrong. Posting one thing in one place and in another thread clarifying is different. I once said I didn't like Bell, a year later I said I did like Bell. Opinions change, or need to be resaid.

But your accusation had no logic and you were wrong.

In a nutshell, I said that for sgg's post to be accurate, others would have to edit their posts. I did not say others already had edited their posts. You failed to comprehend. You are wrong, and by your posts, you proved my case.

 

[Mitchrapp]

In a nutshell, I said that for sgg's post to be accurate, others would have to edit their posts. I did not say others already had edited their posts. You failed to comprehend. You are wrong, and by your posts, you proved my case.

Edit for what, a post based on opinion? Because you disagree or miss-comprehend, it's hard to tell.