Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Another 0 on the stat sheet for Fuller

If Calvin or Tate go down, you are not going to play the midget Broyles on the outside. Fuller makes perfect sense.
 
But they haven't gone down... They are still playing...

You have your outside receivers. Broyles is a perfect player for the slot. Ross is a KR/PR.
 
But they haven't gone down... They are still playing...

You have your outside receivers. Broyles is a perfect player for the slot. Ross is a KR/PR.

They could. That's the point. Outside depth. We already have slot depth active.
 
There's 0 excuse for Broyles not being on that playing field. He offers something that Fuller doesn't. Fuller has not made a single impact on a game. Broyles has shown that he can be someone who will make the tough catches and get up field. He's about as reliable as the Lions had in the preseason. He's being rewarded with a benching over a rookie who has better measurables (so damn sick of that stuff).
 
Fuller offers more size and speed and special teams. Broyles offers good routes.
 
He did???? Broyles had 50 more yards than Fuller, and was basically the top WR in 3/4 games.
 
You know what else Fuller has offered in two regular seasons of games in the NFL?



(This blank above represents what he's offered)
 
1st stringers? I saw him catch a TD from Kellen Moore late in a preseason game. Starters were still in there? Bullshit
 
1st stringers? I saw him catch a TD from Kellen Moore late in a preseason game. Starters were still in there? Bullshit

LATE 4th quarter in the 1st game.

Yeah, tons of 1st and 2nd stringers in at that time!

He beat TJ Heath......who is not even on a practice squad as of right now.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. Let Fuller sit behind receivers that already know how to play the game, maybe he'll learn a thing on two, or not.
 
Yeah he's reaching. There's 0 reason for Broyles to not be playing.
 
first time im agreeing with LKP in awhile....we completely on the same page...its a personnel move. We have 0 packages where broyles...who sucks....would play in the slot over tate and our match up nightmare Ebron. That's where they line up. Taking snaps away from them being on the field would be dumb.

As far as fuller goes...hes getting like 12 snaps....you guys really thinkg Ryan "immovable chains" Broyles would be productive getting 12 snaps on the outside when he hasn't produced in 3 years?
 
Last edited:
first time im agreeing with LKP in awhile....we completely on the same page...its a personnel move. We have 0 packages where broyles...who sucks....would play in the slot over tate and our match up nightmare Ebron. That's where they line up. Taking snaps away from them being on the field would be dumb.

As far as fuller goes...hes getting like 12 snaps....you guys really thinkg Ryan "immovable chains" Broyles would be productive getting 12 snaps on the outside when he hasn't produced in 3 years?

If Tate and ebron are taking up all the slot snaps then how is fuller only getting 12 snaps a game? Who's playing outside?
 
They move Calvin into the slot sometimes. They move Tate into the slot sometimes. When they do that, they need an outside WR.

Boom Fuller.
 
If Tate and ebron are taking up all the slot snaps then how is fuller only getting 12 snaps a game? Who's playing outside?

Calvin plays outside....and when they go 4 wide....fuller plays outside opposite calvin. They don't go 4 wide much. Hence the 12 snaps. And on a couple occasions they moved tate outside and Ross played slot....and with Ross' limited snaps he caught a couple passes. Again....not enough snaps to be concerned whether or not its Broyles.
 
Last edited:
first time im agreeing with LKP in awhile....we completely on the same page...its a personnel move. We have 0 packages where broyles...who sucks....would play in the slot over tate and our match up nightmare Ebron. That's where they line up. Taking snaps away from them being on the field would be dumb.

As far as fuller goes...hes getting like 12 snaps....you guys really thinkg Ryan "immovable chains" Broyles would be productive getting 12 snaps on the outside when he hasn't produced in 3 years?

Immovable chains...classic
 
Back
Top