- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 35,800
what picture of Tom Selleck?
It was an ad in the window above the image. Now it?s a different ad.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get Startedwhat picture of Tom Selleck?
What I think is it might be an overreaction - I think pretty much everyone is clueless about how dangerous it might be and about how to best address it. We know it was very dangerous in China in Italy and not as dangerous in other places.
I heard about public health officials say that if as many as 10 to 15% of Californians don’t comply, half the California population could become infected; and then I heard simply parroting that back as if it was etched in stone fact, and I was thinking...”so... how did they come up with that calculation?” It wasn’t explained how that projection was reached. Maybe it’s going to turn out to be a pretty accurate projection...or maybe it’s just a number somebody pulled out of their ass.
Anyway, my wife telecommutes and she just had surgery to fix a surgery that was screwed up a few years ago, so we were pretty much going to behave as if we were sheltering in place anyway. My sister-in-law has come in to help in my wife’s recuperation, and while she’s been here I’ve been continuing my business which is also viewed as essential.
My gym is closed, but it’s a small boutique boxing gym and the owner is generation + friend, so I’ve been going in while it’s closed to help maintain the equipment, primarily by using it to make sure it’s working properly so it’s ready for when the shutdown ends so the re-open will be a smooth transition.
So my life hasn’t changed a whole lot. I guess the biggest change is I take food out to go instead of eating in - that’s no biggie.
yeah, I've heard some NJ official repeat some other official saying everyone is going to get infected and I was thinking, if everyone is going to get infected, why are all on lock down? I don't believe everyone is going to be infected or that no one is immune to this thing and I get that we can't all be infected at once because it will overwhelm our healthcare system (probably because it's not state run), but still I think we can slow the spread without going on lockdown. Better safe than sorry, but I think we're going to find out that we were overly cautious about this thing.
A week ago, closing gyms and bars and movie theaters was what it would take, we were told.
Anyway, again, my regular life has for a long time has been pretty much no different than being on lockdown is. I never go to the movies or a bar or public places and my business is essential - so nothing really has to change for me.
They are looking at a $2 trillion "stimulus package"
That's about $6,000 for every person in the USA
I think it's amusing how some people still keep clinging to the "meh... I still think this is no big deal!" ...while the deaths start to pile up, more and more restrictions start to get put in place, as the authorities get more and more desperate to stop the spread (probably a little TOO LATE for that!), and we run out of hospital beds and respirators.
I don?t know how big of a deal the pandemic is going to become or not. Nobody?s going to run out of respirators or hospital bags because I failed to shelter in space, because again shelter in space has barely changed my life.
I don?t go to bars or movie theaters or public places and when I?m not on my job - again, which is classified as essential-I?m at home. But that?s normal life for me; it just happens to be pretty much the same as sheltering in space coincidentally.
Are you serious?
By public places I meant like museums and parks and such. I guess restaurants could be viewed as public places and yeah I like to go out to dinner every now and then and if I grab lunch while I?m out doing business I prefer to dine in rather than take it to go.
But giving that up for a while is not going to be a big deal.
Trump and the people humping this idea we need to rollback the responses we've started are fucking nuts. Unfuckingbelievable.
In NYC they're close to being overwhelmed already, and that's going to be the same story everywhere else in the country shortly. The death rates will be a lot higher than 3.4% (which already comes out to 11 Million Americans) if no one can get ventilators because we let this spread out of control. Fuck me.
hmmm, I wonder why if NY is close to being overwhelmed, Gov. Cuomo basically said the same thing as Trump about rolling back some of the restrictions. I also wonder why the popular press reaction to Cuomo saying basically the same thing Trump said was so different from when Trump said it. It's so strange, inexplicable even.
I can’t find a reference to Cuomo saying anything about rolling back the restrictions; but I’m not there so I don’t hear everything someone who’s there would.
LA Mayor Garcetti introduced “Safer at Home” on March 19, scheduled to run through April 19. Within an hour Governor Newsom imposed the same restrictions statewide. I can’t find anything reporting when the statewide restrictions end, if there’s a scheduled end.
These lockdowns are all ordered at the state and local level; I’m hearing some on the news saying Trump doesn’t have the authority to make those kinds of impositions.
Trump wants the “lockdowns” to end Easter; that’s a week before the LA restrictions are currently scheduled to expire.
So we’ll see what happens.
“What I’m saying, basically, is that we can do two things simultaneously,” Trump said, noting “we’ve had this incredible learning period” about the virus that might allow the federal government to review the requirements for social distancing.
Cuomo made the same argument at a press conference on Tuesday.
“Don’t make us choose between the two,” Cuomo said. “We can do both and we must do both.”
Cuomo argued lower-risk and younger people could return to work, as soon they would not need to be quarantined with the elderly.Cuomo parroting @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/3REJPJp41q“You can have an economic start-up strategy that is consistent with a public health strategy,” Cuomo said.
— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) March 24, 2020
He said testing recovering individuals from the coronavirus and sending them back to work was essential, noting many Americans likely had the virus and recovered.
“I believe once we get that test, you’re going to find hundreds of thousands of people who have had the coronavirus and resolved,” Cuomo said.
Cuomo looked forward to younger people returning to work.
“Let the younger people go back to work, let the recovered people go back to work,” he said. “Ramp up the economy with those individuals.”
Cuomo said that although the initial public health strategy was strict, it was possible to refine recommendations based on what officials had learned about the virus.
“So you’re refining your public health strategy and at the same time you’re restarting your economy,” Cuomo said. “Those two can be consistent if done intelligently.”
Trump and the people humping this idea we need to rollback the responses we've started are fucking nuts. Unfuckingbelievable.
here's an excerpt from an article about his comments today:
Thanks.
Sounds pretty similar to me.
I remember seeing a clip of this conference now, with Governor Andrew in his cool “action governor“ garb.
I think I told you my ex-wife has a cousin who was his several years girlfriend in college right?
Seems to me Cuomo would have been a better candidate than any of the other ones the Dems paraded - except for Tulsi, of course.
it is very similar in content...Of course, Cuomo did say it a day or two later, after we finally knew everything there is to know about the virus so the different reaction is probably a function of that.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!