Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coronainsanity

Social credits, carbon tax, rationing, 24/7 surveillance...and the ubiquitous INFORMATION that replaces knowledge.
Carbon tax paired with an equal subsidy of efficient technologies to make it revenue neutral is a great idea that we should be doing.
 
Carbon tax paired with an equal subsidy of efficient technologies to make it revenue neutral is a great idea that we should be doing.

I'm talking about Personal Carbon Trading. It's just semantics: it's a tax for living.
 
Things will only go back to normal if enough morons start standing up and resisting the tyranny. As such, things will never go back to normal as there isn?t a sufficient enough retarded mass that understands it?s all an agenda2030 program.

No chip no service, comply for short term comfort, or peacefully resist for eternal salvation the free will choice is yours.


ftfy
 
Back when I went in stores, I wore 2 masks. A surgical mask, because it's a better barrier material and a homemade mask, which probably didn't filter anything, but it fit really well and held the edges of the surgical mask snug.


I believe this arrangement actually did provide some protection to me.

yeah, beliefs.
 
yeah, beliefs.
Yeah. I'm using this word to convey that I don't think it's scientifically proven. To my knowledge, it hasn't been tested. It's the right word.



When I commented on your feelings about covid data being faked, I was implying that I think you are wrong.
 
I now know a guy who is sick with several of the symptoms of COVID-19, who's girlfriend just tested positive (!), and who refuses to go get tested himself because he thinks COVID-19 is "fake."
 
I now know a guy who is sick with several of the symptoms of COVID-19, who's girlfriend just tested positive (!), and who refuses to go get tested himself because he thinks COVID-19 is "fake."
I read about a nurse saying people are dying, still claiming it's a hoax.


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/s...-real-even-as-theyre-dying-from-it-2020-11-16
Jodi Doering, an emergency-room registered nurse, described the phenomenon in an interview on CNN on Monday, after her Twitter posts attracted wide attention: “It’s not one particular patient; it’s just a culmination of so many people and their last dying words are, ‘This can’t be happening, it’s not real.’
 
Last edited:
I read about a nurse saying people are dying, still claiming it's a hoax.

That nurse mentioned ?so many? people died claiming CV19 is a hoax ... and.the MSM ran with it and did not bother to verify the claim for themselves. It just took the nurse?s word at face value. Link
 
Apparently you took her account at face value, too, because it supports you view of the circumstances?
I realized it's just an anecdote. If I made big claims extrapolating from this anecdote, it would be fair to call me out on it. But I'm not.


I think I'm pretty good about adding qualifiers like "I think" or "I suspect" when it's appropriate. I didn't portray this as anything bigger than what it is.
 
the MSM ran with it and did not bother to verify the claim for themselves. It just took the nurse?s word at face value. Link


This is a good critique though. Anecdotes are just anecdotes and even a small survey is generally better.
 
I realized it's just an anecdote. If I made big claims extrapolating from this anecdote, it would be fair to call me out on it. But I'm not.


I think I'm pretty good about adding qualifiers like "I think" or "I suspect" when it's appropriate. I didn't portray this as anything bigger than what it is.

I’m not calling you on it. I’m calling out MSM, journalists, and politicians for swallowing this storytelling whole and making it “bigger than it is.”

Originally Posted by byco42 View Post
Apparently you took her account at face value, too, because it supports you view of the circumstances?

This was not meant for you, and I deleted it for that reason.
 
Last edited:
I’m not calling you on it. I’m calling out MSM, journalists, and politicians for swallowing this storytelling whole and making it “bigger than it is.”



This was not meant for you, and I deleted it for that reason.


That's fair. Wish we knew how to fix the death spiral of MSM and social media. I don't think it's all a coordinated plot. I think it's a need to make money, well understood principles of advertising and people's irrational instincts, ...and coordinated plotters taking advantage where they can.
 
Last edited:
That's fair. Wish we knew how to fix the death spiral of MSM and social media. I don't think it's all a coordinated plot. I think it's a need to make money, well understood principles of advertising and people's irrational instincts, ...and coordinated plotters taking advantage where they can.

I think it is a completely co-ordinated plot. A handful of corporations own the media, which hammers us with its messaging 24/7. So we can buy crap and keep them in business so it can repeat the process. Social media is equally selective about what it filters and lets pass, too.

How to fix? It?s the wrong question. The right question is: why are we giving it any attention?
 
I think it is a completely co-ordinated plot. A handful of corporations own the media, which hammers us with its messaging 24/7. So we can buy crap and keep them in business so it can repeat the process. Social media is equally selective about what it filters and lets pass, too.

How to fix? It?s the wrong question. The right question is: why are we giving it any attention?


Giving COVID-19 any attention, or that one (1) story?



My anecdote is true. Both the guy and his girlfriend are a couple idiots, but at least she got tested. And fortunately called off her visit to her parents' house for Thanksgiving. The boyfriend would've still gone & likely infected her parents.
 
I wonder if China created COVID to create a pandemic here in the USA. It appears that they have gotten rid of it there. Maybe they had a vaccine the entire time, sacrificed some people there in order to spread it here, trying to ruin our economy.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if China created COVID to create a pandemic here in the USA. It appears that they have gotten rid of it there. Maybe they had a vaccine the entire time, sacrificed some people there in order to spread it here, trying to ruin our economy.
that wouldn't be a very nice thing to do.
 
Yeah. I'm using this word to convey that I don't think it's scientifically proven. To my knowledge, it hasn't been tested. It's the right word.



When I commented on your feelings about covid data being faked, I was implying that I think you are wrong.

it's a good try, but no.

also, the right word is wrong, not faked. To be clear, I'm not implying that I think you're wrong, I'm saying I think the data is wrong.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if China created COVID to create a pandemic here in the USA. It appears that they have gotten rid of it there. Maybe they had a vaccine the entire time, sacrificed some people there in order to spread it here, trying to ruin our economy.
It would an attack on the entire world, and I think they'd get caught eventually. I wonder how the world would react to something like that.
 
Back
Top