Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coronainsanity

Giving COVID-19 any attention, or that one (1) story?

No, the corporate-run media machine. It?s simply not credible anymore.


My anecdote is true. Both the guy and his girlfriend are a couple idiots, but at least she got tested. And fortunately called off her visit to her parents' house for Thanksgiving. The boyfriend would've still gone & likely infected her parents.

I?m not doubting this in any way.
 
It would an attack on the entire world, and I think they'd get caught eventually. I wonder how the world would react to something like that.

Here’s an indication of how some of the world might react:

https://youtu.be/JnxjFgJi99g

Maybe not - hopefully the media will be able to tell us whether a President’s crackhead son getting $1.6B from the Chinese government compromises him in any way. I’m guessing not (I mean, not anymore, of course) but I’m eager to be told.
 
Last edited:
a President?s crackhead son getting $1.6B from the Chinese government
Where did you hear that? Do you have a link?


im-just-kidding-but-seriously.jpg
 
Where did you hear that? Do you have a link?

I made it up, except the part about the crackhead son and the $1.6B from the Chinese government. Oh, and the video, where the guy who Obama's Secretary of Defense said has been wrong on every foreign policy issue for the last 40 years is telling us China isn't a threat and the CCP aren't bad folks, that part is real too.
 
I made it up, except the part about the crackhead son and the $1.6B from the Chinese government. Oh, and the video, where the guy who Obama's Secretary of Defense said has been wrong on every foreign policy issue for the last 40 years is telling us China isn't a threat and the CCP aren't bad folks, that part is real too.

Hmmmm...not sure.

I think it might be Jim Carrey.

Or Woody Harrelson

Or maybe Jason Sudeikis.

Or maybe even Kevin Nealon one remembers that far back.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=shkJfRpktGc
 
I made it up, except the part about the crackhead son and the $1.6B from the Chinese government. Oh, and the video, where the guy who Obama's Secretary of Defense said has been wrong on every foreign policy issue for the last 40 years is telling us China isn't a threat and the CCP aren't bad folks, that part is real too.

Well, if that?s really the case, he?s been nothing of not consistent.
 
He?s traveling to Houston to visit his daughter in Mississippi?

That don?t make no sense.

I thought maybe he was flying to Houston and driving to Mississippi because there were no flights but there are non stop flights from Denver to Mississippi according to Google. :shrug:
 
I thought maybe he was flying to Houston and driving to Mississippi because there were no flights but there are non stop flights from Denver to Mississippi according to Google. :shrug:

I?m going to go out on a limb and guess that the daughter is also traveling to Houston, from Mississippi. I?m guessing Edward R. Murrow didn?t think it was relevant to put the two and two together for the reader.
 
Happy Thanksgiving, religious crazies:

As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus.

The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the majority. It was the conservative?s first publicly discernible vote as a justice. The court?s three liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts dissented.

The move was a shift for the court. Earlier this year, when Barrett?s liberal predecessor, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was still on the court, the justices divided 5-4 to leave in place pandemic-related capacity restrictions affecting churches in California and Nevada.​

The notoriously powerful, evil, secular & progressive state will no longer be able to prevent you from practicing your religion...
 
Happy Thanksgiving, religious crazies:

As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus.

The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the majority. It was the conservative?s first publicly discernible vote as a justice. The court?s three liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts dissented.

The move was a shift for the court. Earlier this year, when Barrett?s liberal predecessor, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was still on the court, the justices divided 5-4 to leave in place pandemic-related capacity restrictions affecting churches in California and Nevada.​

The notoriously powerful, evil, secular & progressive state will no longer be able to prevent you from practicing your religion...

In the movie ?The Basics of Sex,? RBG?s big giant tall Jewish husband was played by 6 foot 5 inch Arm and Hanmer, who wore a Yamaha throughout the whole movie.

So who?s to say anything would be different?
 
Happy Thanksgiving, religious crazies:

As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus.

The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the majority. It was the conservative?s first publicly discernible vote as a justice. The court?s three liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts dissented.

The move was a shift for the court. Earlier this year, when Barrett?s liberal predecessor, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was still on the court, the justices divided 5-4 to leave in place pandemic-related capacity restrictions affecting churches in California and Nevada.​

The notoriously powerful, evil, secular & progressive state will no longer be able to prevent you from practicing your religion...

Oh, and as the notoriously non-religious defender of the 1st Amendment that I am, I would just like ad ?Halle-god damn fuckin-luya!?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BG-_ZDrypec
 
Happy Thanksgiving, religious crazies:

As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus.

The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the majority. It was the conservative?s first publicly discernible vote as a justice. The court?s three liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts dissented.

The move was a shift for the court. Earlier this year, when Barrett?s liberal predecessor, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was still on the court, the justices divided 5-4 to leave in place pandemic-related capacity restrictions affecting churches in California and Nevada.​

The notoriously powerful, evil, secular & progressive state will no longer be able to prevent you from practicing your religion...

well, at least they can go to church...so when they die from COVID they will go to heaven:tup:
 
Happy Thanksgiving, religious crazies:

As coronavirus cases surge again nationwide the Supreme Court late Wednesday barred New York from enforcing certain limits on attendance at churches and synagogues in areas designated as hard hit by the virus.

The justices split 5-4 with new Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the majority. It was the conservative’s first publicly discernible vote as a justice. The court’s three liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts dissented.

The move was a shift for the court. Earlier this year, when Barrett’s liberal predecessor, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was still on the court, the justices divided 5-4 to leave in place pandemic-related capacity restrictions affecting churches in California and Nevada.​

The notoriously powerful, evil, secular & progressive state will no longer be able to prevent you from practicing your religion...

This would seem a bit odd if you were at all consistent in your positions. If you were consistent in anything besides your hatred of religious people you would be more upset that all these other entities weren't restricted to a maximum of 10 and 25 people in their place of business like houses of worship in red and orange zones, respectively. I would think you would find that to be the imprudent regulation.

On top of not being protected by the 1st amendment unless you think shopping falls under the right to assembly, these "essential" businesses are, presumably physically much smaller than churches and therefore pose a much larger risk of spreading infection. You're only consistent in your hatred for religious people, blaming them for defending their constitutional rights and challenging arbitrary rules applied only to them and a few other "non-essential" rather than applying the same standard to everyone for this virus you're so afraid of.
 
Last edited:
This would seem a bit odd if you were at all consistent in your positions. If you were consistent in anything besides your hatred of religious people you would be more upset that all these other entities weren't restricted to a maximum of 10 and 25 people in their place of business like houses of worship in red and orange zones, respectively. I would think you would find that to be the imprudent regulation.

On top of not being protected by the 1st amendment unless you think shopping falls under the right to assembly, these "essential" businesses are, presumably physically much smaller than churches and therefore pose a much larger risk of spreading infection. You're only consistent in your hatred for religious people, blaming them for defending their constitutional rights and challenging arbitrary rules applied only to them and a few other "non-essential" rather than applying the same standard to everyone for this virus you're so afraid of.

:hmm:

I read through this twice, and I still have no idea what you're arguing or trying to say here.
 
as long as they don't spread it to any of us heathen sinners, I'd say that's a win/win scenario.

This is the sentiment on Twitter. Let'm kill each other off. Oh, and deny them healthcare.

People in NY have already been attending Mass and other church services at limited capacity for some time. (25% to 50%) Nothing will change for the short term. Except that the limits of 10 and 25 people at Mass was overruled and cannot be reinforced, as other "essential" business have more relaxed restrictions, or none at all, at the same time.

Then, there's Roberts and his fence-sitting:

"None of the houses of worship identified in the applications is now subject to any fixed numerical restrictions,? he said, adding that New York?s 10 and 25 person caps ?do seem unduly restrictive.?

I suppose he can't project that Cuomo would not reinstitute these restrictions? And the hue and cry of "social Darwin-ism" in effect is several days late and dollars short.

I attend Mass five days a week and have been since April or so. We have numbers restrictions and people are very observant of distancing protocol and the like. No one has contracted COVID in our parish from attending Mass. Comparing the behavior of the parishioners at the three churches I attend, they are far more reserved in their caution than people out there in the general public. And it's not even close.

We are all still here, much to the chagrin of people who object.
 
Back
Top